✦ High Court of India · 15 Sep 2025

SRI v. vs S. HARI NARAYANA

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,221 words

lVglfare, Department of Agricutture & Farmer3 Welfire, Xrisfri Bfrawin, ruew Delhi - '1 1000'1 . 2 The State of Telangana, Rep By its principal Secretary. Department of _ Agricutture. Secretariat Buildings, Hydera[iad, Telangaiia _ iOOOZZ. 3. The Commissioner/ Director of Agriiulture, Telangan"a, OppositelS. Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderab5d, Telangana - 5OOOOl. ' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declarrng the action of the Respondent authorities in interfering with manufacture, import, sare, stocking, display of biostimulant products TRUSoIL, TRUBASE-G, NEIVARID, N/-POWER, MANASOIL, EXOIVE SUPERSOIL, TRUBASE, TERRASTAR, NEIMANIL, MAXGAIN, EXOIVE, GAINUP, EXOIUE SECURE, EXOIME HARVESTER, TETRAPOWER, K.BIO, CALRATNA, TELS.BV, MINBOOST, KORIDA, SPROPO, RAPICAL, SUPER-K, LYSOVIR, KALIBER, SMAX, XTENSE, PHYTECT) pending finat adjudication of submitted A2 applications in Telangana and/or until a reasoned order and consequently direct --- the respondent authorities not to interfere with the p: itioners business of manufacture sale and nrarketing of its bio products in the St r e of Telangana. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc prayrng that in the cir rumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court m: / be pleased to direct the Respondents authorities not to interfere with the p: itioners business of manufacture sale and marketing of its bio products in lhr; State of Telangana, pending disposal of the Writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section '1 51 CpC praying that in the c r )umstances stated tn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court n i y be pleased to stay on any enforcement or regulatory measure by state ac t ncies in Telangana relating to the sale, stocking, or display of petitioner's bio; imulant product and lnterim injunction against any coercive steps pending 'i ral disposal of the application and/or till issuance of a reasoned order, pendin; disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. V. S. HARI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SC FOR CENTRAL GO\/ :RNMENT Counsel for the Respondent No 2 & 3: Gp FOR AGRICULTU tE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.27723 0F 2025 ORDER: This Wnt Petition is filed for the following relief:- ".... .. to 6sue a wit or dlrection parTicularlg one in the nature of Wrtt of Mandamus declafury the action of the Respondent quthoities in interfennq uttll manufacture, import, sale, stocking, disptag of biostintulani prodrtcts TRLISOIL, TRIJBASE-G, NEMARID, M ?OWE\ MA NASOIL, EXOM E SUPERSOII,. TRU BASE, TERRASTAR, NEMANIL, MAXGAIN, EXOME, AAINUP, EXOME SECIJRE, EXOME T]ARVESTER, TETRAPOWER, K.BIO, CALRATNA, TELS BV, MINBOOST, KORIDA, SPROPO, RAPICAL, SUPER K, LYSOVIR, KALIBER, SMAX, XI'ENSE, PIIYTECT) pertdirtg J rct adjltdlcation of submitted A2 applicotions in Telangana atld/or until a reasoned order qnd consequentlg direct the respondert oLtLhoities tlot to iierkre with the petittoners business qf manufacture sc.le anul merketing of its bio products in the State of Telangarta pass such... "

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for Central Government appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned Government pleacler for Agriculture appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. Perused the material available on record.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order of this Court dated 10.07.2015 in 2 TMDJ wp_27723 2A25 W.P.No.25293 of 2014 and batch, as modified bl, the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.ll22 and 1136 of 2016, dated

03.11.2016. Further, this Court, rn,hile clisposing , ,f W.p.No.48 of 2O2l and batch uide colr.mon order clated 07.0 ) 202 1. held as under: " 1 1. In uieu thereof, the Writ petitions are clisposed :.4 Libertg to the petitlotlers to make opplicatnns in compltan,t requirement of Clause 5 of the orcler of tlle Gouentfttcr:t beaing No.S.O.8B2 (E), dated 23.03.2021, ulthtl tLUo (O2) u) the date of recelpt of coplJ of this order. If such opplicatton:; within the time stiputated aboue, the conpetent euthoitll sl c the sqme and if satisfied. to Ls-sue prousrcnol Ce)l Registrotiotl in f'orm C-3, utithm fortr (4) weeks thertaJlet qraniing tDitlL the of htdia, 'eks from te ntade I process ticate- of o2.2021 ers to l)e titled to eftirtcak

12. It is ilade clear that the competent outhoitg is . collect sampLes in compliance of part C of the order dated _. and test the compatibility of the pro(jucts neeting the paronLe marketed 2 as bio nutrients, before granting tlte prouisiortul ( of Registratiott. lt is itt the public itter"st to ensurc tltQt o ] r I produced and markeled as a bio tlutrient Lutth the obJect ol.ttl farmer to de.uelop high celLulose, and resistance pou)er it t, meets the parameters to quolifg as q bio_nutient. The petitir r co-operate in dratuing the samples. Ultil the e_,rercise o; aboue, is comJ:leted, subject of course to petitloners ;1 bmitting applications within the time stipulated eboue a d tn contu iance of requirements of Clause 5 of the order date.l 23.O2.2A.1 oJ Lhe, Gouenlment of Indta, petitioners ore entitled to monlrl o )1 re and distibute as contetnplated bg Clause 4 of the or(ler dated 2-. 2. 2A 2 L Howeuer, it is aluags open to the competent authoitq ) uenfg whether the products manufactured anrl distibute,cl bg the lt( ,itioners uct to be t.ping the e plenLs zrs shall directed I \ 3 TMO,J wp-27123 2075 are in compliance u,ith the stotutory rcquirements and take action os wqrranted bA law'.

4. In terms of the aforestated orders alrd for the reasons mentioned therein, this Writ Petition is also disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, il aly, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/.S. MALLI ASSISTA KARJUNA RAO NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers.Welfare' Department of ' Affi.i"lt;;ei;;";='w;ft;'ljlxil'n enu*'n' Union or lndia' New Delhi - ,. 1130311".'ral Secretary. Department of Agriculture' Secretariat Buildings' Hvderabad, State ot r"r"ngbnu' Telangana - 500022' a Tia cnmmissioner/ oirei,iSlt'ingnc'if i"' Telang-ana'.opposite L B' ' slSoi#,'aJ.#"iurgh' Hvotobid' relansana - 50000'1' --" "u d"tigY :Jlmtr8oGli, #{T}?t,::,i31q',pr 4 6. Two CCs to GP ron ndHrEiLlirnE' nigL Court for the Siate of Telangana 7. Two CD CoPies MMT BS HIGH COURT DATED:1510912025 ORDER WP.No.27723 of 2025 ':\\\ f I '10 Lit ffi DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITON WITHOUT COSTS { b\\r

lVglfare, Department of Agricutture & Farmer3 Welfire, Xrisfri Bfrawin, ruew Delhi - '1 1000'1 . 2 The State of Telangana, Rep By its principal Secretary. Department of _ Agricutture. Secretariat Buildings, Hydera[iad, Telangaiia _ iOOOZZ. 3. The Commissioner/ Director of Agriiulture, Telangan"a, OppositelS. Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderab5d, Telangana - 5OOOOl. ' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declarrng the action of the Respondent authorities in interfering with manufacture, import, sare, stocking, display of biostimulant products TRUSoIL, TRUBASE-G, NEIVARID, N/-POWER, MANASOIL, EXOIVE SUPERSOIL, TRUBASE, TERRASTAR, NEIMANIL, MAXGAIN, EXOIVE, GAINUP, EXOIUE SECURE, EXOIME HARVESTER, TETRAPOWER, K.BIO, CALRATNA, TELS.BV, MINBOOST, KORIDA, SPROPO, RAPICAL, SUPER-K, LYSOVIR, KALIBER, SMAX, XTENSE, PHYTECT) pending finat adjudication of submitted A2 applications in Telangana and/or until a reasoned order and consequently direct --- the respondent authorities not to interfere with the p: itioners business of manufacture sale and nrarketing of its bio products in the St r e of Telangana. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc prayrng that in the cir rumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court m: / be pleased to direct the Respondents authorities not to interfere with the p: itioners business of manufacture sale and marketing of its bio products in lhr; State of Telangana, pending disposal of the Writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section '1 51 CpC praying that in the c r )umstances stated tn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court n i y be pleased to stay on any enforcement or regulatory measure by state ac t ncies in Telangana relating to the sale, stocking, or display of petitioner's bio; imulant product and lnterim injunction against any coercive steps pending 'i ral disposal of the application and/or till issuance of a reasoned order, pendin; disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. V. S. HARI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SC FOR CENTRAL GO\/ :RNMENT Counsel for the Respondent No 2 & 3: Gp FOR AGRICULTU tE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.27723 0F 2025 ORDER: This Wnt Petition is filed for the following relief:- ".... .. to 6sue a wit or dlrection parTicularlg one in the nature of Wrtt of Mandamus declafury the action of the Respondent quthoities in interfennq uttll manufacture, import, sale, stocking, disptag of biostintulani prodrtcts TRLISOIL, TRIJBASE-G, NEMARID, M ?OWE\ MA NASOIL, EXOM E SUPERSOII,. TRU BASE, TERRASTAR, NEMANIL, MAXGAIN, EXOME, AAINUP, EXOME SECIJRE, EXOME T]ARVESTER, TETRAPOWER, K.BIO, CALRATNA, TELS BV, MINBOOST, KORIDA, SPROPO, RAPICAL, SUPER K, LYSOVIR, KALIBER, SMAX, XI'ENSE, PIIYTECT) pertdirtg J rct adjltdlcation of submitted A2 applicotions in Telangana atld/or until a reasoned order qnd consequentlg direct the respondert oLtLhoities tlot to iierkre with the petittoners business qf manufacture sc.le anul merketing of its bio products in the State of Telangarta pass such... "

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for Central Government appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned Government pleacler for Agriculture appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. Perused the material available on record.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order of this Court dated 10.07.2015 in 2 TMDJ wp_27723 2A25 W.P.No.25293 of 2014 and batch, as modified bl, the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.ll22 and 1136 of 2016, dated

03.11.2016. Further, this Court, rn,hile clisposing , ,f W.p.No.48 of 2O2l and batch uide colr.mon order clated 07.0 ) 202 1. held as under: " 1 1. In uieu thereof, the Writ petitions are clisposed :.4 Libertg to the petitlotlers to make opplicatnns in compltan,t requirement of Clause 5 of the orcler of tlle Gouentfttcr:t beaing No.S.O.8B2 (E), dated 23.03.2021, ulthtl tLUo (O2) u) the date of recelpt of coplJ of this order. If such opplicatton:; within the time stiputated aboue, the conpetent euthoitll sl c the sqme and if satisfied. to Ls-sue prousrcnol Ce)l Registrotiotl in f'orm C-3, utithm fortr (4) weeks thertaJlet qraniing tDitlL the of htdia, 'eks from te ntade I process ticate- of o2.2021 ers to l)e titled to eftirtcak

12. It is ilade clear that the competent outhoitg is . collect sampLes in compliance of part C of the order dated _. and test the compatibility of the pro(jucts neeting the paronLe marketed 2 as bio nutrients, before granting tlte prouisiortul ( of Registratiott. lt is itt the public itter"st to ensurc tltQt o ] r I produced and markeled as a bio tlutrient Lutth the obJect ol.ttl farmer to de.uelop high celLulose, and resistance pou)er it t, meets the parameters to quolifg as q bio_nutient. The petitir r co-operate in dratuing the samples. Ultil the e_,rercise o; aboue, is comJ:leted, subject of course to petitloners ;1 bmitting applications within the time stipulated eboue a d tn contu iance of requirements of Clause 5 of the order date.l 23.O2.2A.1 oJ Lhe, Gouenlment of Indta, petitioners ore entitled to monlrl o )1 re and distibute as contetnplated bg Clause 4 of the or(ler dated 2-. 2. 2A 2 L Howeuer, it is aluags open to the competent authoitq ) uenfg whether the products manufactured anrl distibute,cl bg the lt( ,itioners uct to be t.ping the e plenLs zrs shall directed I \ 3 TMO,J wp-27123 2075 are in compliance u,ith the stotutory rcquirements and take action os wqrranted bA law'.

4. In terms of the aforestated orders alrd for the reasons mentioned therein, this Writ Petition is also disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, il aly, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/.S. MALLI ASSISTA KARJUNA RAO NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers.Welfare' Department of ' Affi.i"lt;;ei;;";='w;ft;'ljlxil'n enu*'n' Union or lndia' New Delhi - ,. 1130311".'ral Secretary. Department of Agriculture' Secretariat Buildings' Hvderabad, State ot r"r"ngbnu' Telangana - 500022' a Tia cnmmissioner/ oirei,iSlt'ingnc'if i"' Telang-ana'.opposite L B' ' slSoi#,'aJ.#"iurgh' Hvotobid' relansana - 50000'1' --" "u d"tigY :Jlmtr8oGli, #{T}?t,::,i31q',pr 4 6. Two CCs to GP ron ndHrEiLlirnE' nigL Court for the Siate of Telangana 7. Two CD CoPies MMT BS HIGH COURT DATED:1510912025 ORDER WP.No.27723 of 2025 ':\\\ f I '10 Lit ffi DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITON WITHOUT COSTS { b\\r

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments