The High Court · 2025

Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

2. Kethavath Amarsingh, S/o. Dhargya Age 31 years, Occ Auto Driver, Present Rl/o H. No. 5T/68, Khajabagh Colony, Vtc Saidabad. Sub district Saidabad, District Hyderabad, Permanent R/o. Dharmarekya Thanda village of neredugommu Mandal, Nalgonda District, TG. TfFIrcfIfirIIlllNnNfS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC No. 129612021 on the file of the Prl. Judicial First Class Magistrate at Devarakonda filed U/Sec. 420 IPC 3 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in CC No.'1296/2021 on the file of the Principal Judicial First Class Magistrate at Devarakonda pending disposal of quash petition in the interest of Justice. 2 Kethavath Amarsingh, R/o H. No. 5T/68, Khaj District Hyderrabad, Permanent R/o. neredugommu Mandal, Nalgonda District, TG. S/o. D A.uto Driver, Present b district Saidabad, rmarekya Thanda village of ...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant AND '1. The State of Telangana, Through, P. S. Neredugommu, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, lligh Court, Hyderabad.

2. Depavath Ravi, S/o. Shankar Aged about 32 years, Occ Business, R/o. Plot No. 9, Road No. 1, Agriculture Colony, Hasthinapuram, Kharmangahat. Rangareddy district T. G.

3. Katravath Lakpathi, S/o. Julya Aged Katravath Thanda(Jwala) 11- 112, Merrpet, KV Rangareddy district T. G. about 44 years, Occ Business, R/o. Lenin Nagar, Chinthakunta colony, Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to the compromise and quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused in CC No. 129612021 on the file of Principal Judicial First Class Magistrate at Devarakonda. l.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memr:randum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/Defacto complainant to record the compromise the case in C.C No.'l29612021 on the file of the Principal Judicial First Class Magistrate at Devarakonda against the accused. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminirl Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri PRAVEEN BONKURI, Advocate for the Petitioner Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3&4OF 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.12024 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of BNSS, is filed by the petitioners-accused seeking to quash the proceedings against them in CC No.1296 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Devarakonda, registered for the offence under Section 420 l.P.C.

2. Heard Sri Praveen Bonkuri, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State and Ms. Thakur Manaswini Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

3. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners-accused as well as respondent No.2-de facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, de facto complainant filed l.A.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 seeking permission to compromise the matter and to record the compromise in terms of the Joint Memo and to quash the proceedings in the subject case against the petitioners.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petition. ,] t a 2 ETD,J Crl.P.No.12024 of 2025

5. Perused the affidavit filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.No.4 of 202t.5, which discloses that he has willingly consented for compromise. Siince the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respectiv,= counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, vide order, dated 16 09.2025, passed by this Court.

6. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Leg;al Services Committee for the State of T,elangana and the Secretary of the above said Committee has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 19.09.2025, stating that the parties were identified and they have wilfully and without any coercion entered into compromrse

7. ln vievu of the above, l.A.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, tlris Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in CC No.1296 of ',>-O21 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Devarakonda, against the petitioners-accused are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners-accused paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Telangana state Legal services Authority, High r3ourt Buildings, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees -, 3 ETD,J Crl.P.No.12024 of 2025 Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Courl Advocates' Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/ To, SD/. B REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Prl. Judicial First Class Magistrate at Devarakonda, Nalgonda District 2. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Neredugommu, Nalgonda Dist 3. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad. (OUT) 4. One CC to SRI PRAVEEN BONKURI Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two CD Copies Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise %'*ABK Note: TotalAmount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri B.Praveen, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 16.09.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Telangana State Legal Services Authority, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates' Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 125404 of 2025 and Receipt No. 1709 dated 07-11-2025. HIGH COURT DATED i2911012025 3 sTL \ I rh{ ORDER l.A.Nos.3&4of2025 ln/And CRLP.No.12A24 of 2025 GRIMINAL PETITION IS ALLOWED \q 11 "( ., ,,2t MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION _ (Filed Under Sec.320 of Cr.P.C. ) IN THE I-{IGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA l.A..No. of 2022 Crl.P.No of 2A22' Between 1 2 1 2 Depavath Ravi S/o. Shankar Aged about 32 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Plot I',1o.9, Road No.1, Agriculture Colony, Hasthinapuram, Kharmangahat, Rangared,ly d istrict T.G. K#vath t-akpathi S/o. Julya Aged about 44 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Katravath Thanda(Jwala) 1 1-1 12, Lenin Nagar, Chinthakunta colony, Merrpet, KV Rangareddy district T.G. ..Petitioner's/Accuseds AND The State of Telangana through, P.S. Nereclugommu, Rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. .Respondent Kethavath Amarsingh S/o.Dhargya Age 31 yei:lrs, Occ: Auto Driver Present R/o H.No.ST/68, Khajabagh Colony, Vtc Saidabad, Sub districl: Saidabad, District Hyderabad, Permanent R/o. Dharmarekya Thanda village of neredugommu [Vlandal, Nalgonda District, TG. ..Defacto complainant l l, L l: I ! t: I I t: I I I: I r t I i j : j :] 5i i I -- ,:.\ MO U AND JOINT MEMO.FILE D;:BY,THE PETI ERS AND RE ND ENT..NO.2

1. lt is submitted that the petitioners herein filed the above quash petition seeking to quash the Crime No.66/2021 U/Sec.42O lpC of p.S. Neredugommu. The Respondent No.2 has lodged the above case against the petitioner under UtSec.420 lPC, whetein the petitioner was figured as Accused.

2. We humbly submit that at the instance of the elders and welt- wishers, we have settled the disputes amicably and the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2 have agreed to settle the present dispute in &fr No.66/2021 UlSec.420 IPC of P.S. Neredugommu, before this Hon'ble Court. As such we have filed a petition seeking this Hon'ble Court to record the compromise. The contents mentioned in the said compromise petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. The said compromise is entered with free will and consent and without any coercion. Hence, we are filing the present joint Memo. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioners herein to compound the offences with the Respondent No.2 herein by recording compromise and by allowing the Criminal petition filed by the petitioner against Gffi No.66/2021 U/Sec.420 IPC of P.S. Neredugommu, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. q "lz--,:ls,^-/Z-= COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.2 1 PETITIONER K:-la{ gC..;

2. PETITIONER t,-s,s.Es RESPONDENT NO.2 .f