DR.M.JAYAPRAKASH v. THE COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
petition are dismissed as such
Judgment
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.762 OF 2010 & W.P.No.25740 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) In view of the intemperate language used against the learned single Judge in some of the paras of the appeal, the learned counsel for the appellant tendered an apology on affidavit, which is accepted. The said grounds shall be deemed to be nonest. No further proceedings on that count. After having heard learned counsel for the appellant at some length, he sought withdrawal of the appeal as also the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. Appeal as also the writ petition are dismissed as such. (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 7th February, 2011. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.762 OF 2010 & W.P.No.25740 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 7th February, 2011.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.