B.L. Narsing Rao v. 1. Union of lndia

Petition Unde:r Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances statr:d in the affidavit filed therewith, th€, High Court may be pleased to issue arr appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of Respondents 7 to 10 in not registering the FIR despite Respondent no.1 and also the reference made by the Hon'ble Judicial I Class Magistrate Malkajgiri in dirr;cting the Respondent no.10 to register ther FIR against Respondents 11 to 16 under section 302, 498A and 120(B) IPC and other sections of Law and consequently direct the Respondents 7 to 1C to register the FIR against the Respondents 11 to 16 in the lnterest of Justice. |.A.NO:1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 7 to 10 to register the FIR forthwith as ordered by the Judicial Magistrate of I Class Malkajgiri in the lnterest of Justice. I.A.NO:2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent no. 1 to 3 and 7 to 10 to handover lnvestigation to respondent no.4 after registration of FIR by the respondent no.10 in the lnterest of Justice. |.A.NO:1 OF 2024 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No 1 to 6 to expedite the steps to file the appropriate application before the Criminal Court for extraditing the respondents No's 11 & 12 (Accused No. 1 & 2) under crime No. 87912023 dated. 3'1-10-2023 U/s 302' 120(B), 34, 149,498A IPC & 3 & 4 DP Act expeditiously in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.K.SRIDHAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR (DEPUTY soLlclToR GENERAL OF INDIA) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3, 5 to 10 : G.P FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.4 : SRI T.SRUJAN KUMAR REDDY The Court made the following ORDER 'r To SA LS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.3O187 of 2023 ORDER: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of the Court to rvithclraw this Writ Petition. To the above affect, a letter addressed to the RegistrariJudicial), High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderrrbad, has been liled bv the learned counsel lor the petitioner rnto the Registry on 13.03.2025

2. Granting permission as sought for, this Writ Petition is dismiss,:d as rrvithd rawn. No order as to costs.

3. Cons;equentlv. miscellaneous petitions pending, if rrn1 . shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SDIV.KAVITHA DEPUW REGISTRAR \ I ! ,,,- SECTION OFFICER 'J I Hyderabad. (OUT)

1. Two CC's to Ci.P FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at 2. One CC to SRIT.K.SRIDHAR, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI cADl PRAVEEN KUMAR (DEPUTY SOLIC|TOR GENERAL OF INDIA) Ad'yocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to SRI T.SRUJAN KUMAR REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CD Copies la-I lr I a (, ,,( t 'fi{E SI{7.' 17 APR ?U5 C t,Esontertt-O I HIGH COURT DATED:1810312025 ORDER WP.No.3O187 ot 2023 DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. I (u r( L)