G.V.L.N. Charyulu v. '1 . The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedtoissueaWrit'orderorDirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureof writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent police particularly Sth respondentinnotregisteringtheFlRbasingonthecomplaintofthepetitioner dated 26.03.2025, even the 5th respondent in receipt of the same is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of apex court rulings held in LalithaKumari Vs. Govt of UP and ors and as well as BNS andconsequentlydirecttherespondentspolicetoentertainthecomplaintand register the FlR. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents porice to register the FrR basing on the complaint of the petitioner dated 26 03.2025, to take appropriate action, pending disposar of the main writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner : SRI D.A.PREM CHAND Counsel for the Respondents : SRI M.SRINIVAS, AGp FOR HOME The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER rcw.: THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRITPETITIoN No.275rl4 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:_ "to declare the actio.rt. of the respondent police particularly 5*, respondent in not regs^tering the Flk basing on the comptaint "of petitioner dated 26.03.2025, eoen .the S,rt, reipondent in ocript iy ilr" same, is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles uy ,rtuA flrtir" and also ttiolation of apex couit rulings held in Lahtha Kumari Vs Goat. of l_lp andors attd as well as ntis ona ,onrrquently direct the respondents police to entertain the complaint antl register the FlR.-

3. Brief facts stated in this writ petition are that petitioner claims to be master in Astrology and he is engage in performing pooja as remedies to the clients who approached him. The petitioner is permanent resident of Hyderabad, staying at Jillelaguda, Meerpet. It is further submitted that the Petitioner is staying in Hyderabad for 15 days and another 15 days he is staying in vijayawada. The case of the petitioner rs that on 2s.o3.2025, between 3 PM to 4 pM, some persons entered into his chambers and detained him for extracting money by using physical assault and threatened him with dire consequences and demanded an amount of Rs.10,00,000/_ andforcibly taken tfuee (03) cheques of Federal bank, Athmakuri tsrancfu Guntur District. The said incident was recorded in CCTV footage. Thereafter, the petitioner on 26.03.2025 made complaint and requested respondent No.5 to take action 2 against the said persons. However, till date no action is initiated' Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 placed on record instructions issued by Sub-Inspector of Police, Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, \Alherein it is stated that petitioner's complaint dated. 26.03.2025 was registered on 05'05 2025 and GD entry ztide petition No.FIYD/BH_HyD / 050525 / 00928 dated 05.05.2025 was made and during the course of the enquiry, the respondent No'5 sent his staff to the petitioner's residence and even tried to contact hirn over pl1one. It is further submitted that petitioner neither responded to the phone calls nor had produced arry relevant evidence before the enquiry officer' Hence, on 7L.09.2025, the petitioner's complaint dated 26.03.2025 n'as closed as 'Lack of evidence' and the same was comrnunicated to the petltioner through SMS'

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleadcr for Home further submits that instead of appearing before the respondent No 5 and submitting relevant evidence, petitioner had filed the writ petition with false allegations'

6. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner subrnits that the petitioner is very much diligent in pursuing his case ancl pray this Court to direct the respondent No.5 to re-examine the petitioner's complaint dated

26.03.2025 and register FlR.

7. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and since the petitioner is ready to co-operate and submit relevant evidence, this Court 3 deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition granting Iiberty to petitioner to approach the respondent No.5 0n 19.09.2025 at 11.00 AM and submit relevant evidence and thereafter, the respondent authorities are directed to re-examine petitioner's complaint dated 26.03.2025 a.d after examining the evidence, respondent authorities are directed to follow due procedure as contemplated under law.

8. With the above directions, this writ petition 1S disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed No order as to //TRUE COPY// SD/. P.PON NA KRISHNA s TANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To , State of Telangana at HyoeraDa0. 1 The Principal Secretary, Home Department Sec 2. The Director General of police, D9p Office, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3' The commissioner of porice, ilvaerauai cb-lni".idneritel iva"*o'"u. 4. fhe Assistant Commissionei of eof ice, einjai"t iff" Oiriiion 5 Hyderabad. T_he Station House Officer, Banjarahills police Station, Banjarahills, Hyderabad. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI D.A.PREM CHAND, Advocate IOPUC] Two CD Copies 6 7 I SA PSK ,{ i L i -a, , C.C. TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:1610912025 I ) .) '/ !-' .\ j.- :', - -:\. 'i.: \ =& l*15- t\ .-1 l,: ' .,.... P -'.; .: ORDER WP.No.27644 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. la'