✦ High Court of India · 08 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Oct 2025
Length
1,194 words

...REVN. PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN IA/PLAINTIFF AND

1. The Station House Officer, Town Police Statron, Kothagudem 2. Superindent of Police, Khammam. Khammam District. 3. Thasildar, Kothagudem Khammam D T. 4. District Collector, Khammam. 5. Qeputy Executive Engineer, lrrigation Sub Division Kothagudem 6 Superindent of Engineer, lrrigation Khammam. 7. Executive Engineer, Kothagudem. 8. Assistant Engineer, lrrigation Kothagudem. 9. Joint Collector, Khammam. 10 R.D.O , Kothagudem. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN IA/DEFENDANTS lA NO: I OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in O.S. No. 128 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem pending disposal of the above revision petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order granted by order dated 08-04-2019 in CRP No. 4578 of 20'18 until further orders pending disposal of the above revision petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRL T S ANAND Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. HERUR RAJESH KUMT,R FOR GP FOR ARBITRATION CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 7409 OF 2018 Petition under Arlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia : qgrieved by the Order dated 13 11 2018 passed in l.A No 362 of 2018 in O.S N c 128 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Junror Civil Court, Kothagudem. Between: Chirunomula Narasrmha Rao, S/o.late Satyanarayanir ,Aged about 85 years R/o Sulatha nagar Kothagudem Mandal Khammam Dis I ict ...REVN. PETITIONER/PETITIo {ER IN IA/PLAINTIFF AND

1. The Station House Officer, I-Town Police Station, Koth;l rudem 2. Superindent of Police Khammam,, Khammam District 3. Thasrldar Kothagudem. Khammam D.T. 4. District Collector Khammam., District Collector Khamm: r. 5. Deputy Executrve Engrneer,, lrrigation Sub Division Koll lgudem. 6 Superindent of Engineer,, lrrigation Khammam. 7. Executrve Engineer, Kothagudem. B. Assistant Engineer,, lrrigation Kothagudem. 9. Joint Collector Khammam., Jornt Collector Khammam 10 R D O Kothagudem , R.D.O. Kothagudem. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDEN t ; IN IA/DEFENDANT lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petrtion under Sectron 1 5't CPC praying that in the cir umstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ni y be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS NO.128/2015 on the file of the ;ourt of the Principal Junior Crvil Judge, Kothagudem pending disposal of the abor r CRP Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. T S ANAND Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. HERUR RAJESH KUMII il FOR GP FOR ARBITRATION CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 689 OF 2019 Petition under Arlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia a( :lrieved by the Order dated 23 01 .2019 passed in Tr.O.P. No. 895 of 2018, on th, file of the Court of the Principal District Judges Court, Khammam. Between: Chirunomula Narasimha Rao, S/o late Satyanarayana Aged about 85 years R/o Sujatha nagar Kothagudem Mandal Khammam District ...REVN. PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN TR.CP AND

1. The Station House Officer, l-Town Police Station, Kothagudem 2 Superrndent of Police Khammam, Khammam District. 3. Thasildar, Kothagudem, Khammam Drstrict 4. District Collector, Khammam. 5. Deputy Executive Engineer,, lrrigation Sub Division Kothagudem. Khammam District

6. Superindent of Engineer,, lrrigation Khammam. 7. Executive Engineer, Kothagudem, Khammam District 8 Assistant Engineer,, lrrigation Kothagudem, Khammam District 9. Joint Collector, Khammam. 10 R.D.O., Kothagudem. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONSWNRA IN TR.OP lA NO: 1 OF 20'19 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that tn the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.NO.128/2015 on the file of the court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem pending disposal of the above CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. T S ANAND Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. HERUR RAJESH KUMAR FOR GP FOR ARBITRATION The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO I ANDIKONDA C.R.P.Nos.4578 and 7409 of 2O18 and 6ll ) of 2O19 COMMON ORDER: C.R.P.No.4578 ol 2018 is filed agg.ielcd x'the docket order, dated 05.07.2018 passed in I.A.No.25> > of 2017 rn O.S.No. 128 of 20 15 on the file of the Principz I Junior Civil Judge, Kotl-rasudem, tr herein the petition filed ,- '-rder Orcler XI Rule 14 ol C.P.C. by the revision petiti(, rer to direct respondent No.B to produce official list of tan I. bed/bund of Sujatha Nagar Mandal along \\'ith attested copr including the village of Slrjatha Nagar was dismissed

2. C.R.P.No.7409 ol 2O7B is filed aggrievec by the order, dated 13.11.2018 passed in I.A.No.362 of 2r) 8 ir-r O.S.No 128 of 20 15 on the file of the Principal Juni: Civil Judge, Kothagudem, rvherein the petition filed under )rder VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. by the rev ion petitioner to amend the pleadings in the plaint was dismir; ;ed.

3. C.R.P.No.689 of 2079 is hled aggrieved ry the order, \ dated 23.0i.2019 passed in T.O.P.No.895 of 2( 18 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Khammam, wherein the I a) a petition filed under Section 24 of C.p.C. lrv the revision petitioner to transfer O.S.No.l28 of 2015 from the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem to any other Court in KothaguCern was dismissed

4. Today 'when the matters have come up before this Court for hearing, Sri Herur Rajesh Kumar, lehrned Government Pleader for Arbitration, appearing for the respondents submits that during pendency of the instant Civil Revision Petitions, the trial Court has disposed of the main suit i.e., O.S.No.l28 of 20 15 on 27.07.2022 itself and therefore, the cause in the Civii Revision Petitions does not survive and have become infructuous. i-Ie also placed the copy of the judgment in the suit.

5. Recording the said submission, all the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Miscelianeous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand dismissed. SD/-A.V.S.PRASAD DEPUW REGIST //TRUE COPYII ECTION OFFICER 1 The Principal Junior Civil Judges Court, Kothagudam. 2. The Principal District Judges Court, Khammam. 3. One CC to Sri. T S Anand Advocate tOpUCl 4. Two CCs to GP for Arbitration, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies. \ .]# \ To %, HIGH COURT DATED:0811012025 COMMON ORDER CRP.Nos.4578 and 7409 of 201d And 689 of 2019 ) -t- 'a;z' 2 t io.' ,/-\ E S '1 I, E I u25 c Ta r-Q * DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETI"IONS AS INFRUCTUOUS 0tu11 lo"L

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments