The High Court · 2026

Peti;:ion under Section 151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of thepetition, tn"" High'court may be preased to :ytp9!.d the judgment and decree in ds.ruo. 6gt or i6,it a.tua 22t11t2019 on the file of the ll Additionar.District Judge, R.anga n"oov oiririct at LB Nagar, pending disposal of the AS, in the interest oi justice. IA NO:1 OF Between: [fl;3fr ;h,"1:d.El3i%!*?,[xi:i1utftts.$,".y,,i{&il!fitiff ffrif, ; A Prasii : il iiii, i,fiI8 "t{l;sa#3.aLs?"., " R eo o v b i ;di6i, n !t [i] 6" 6ij! H o l o;i ... petitioner/Appellant AND fiLtJa?ilyJnnE2p?: gJl":?:?KapaJanardhan Reddv, Agpd 99 years, R/o kJri'"irjnli's",oo,,n"sar Manda',.'H3l.fiIR'3Jff83?J,'"?.r'"Hainin'apurzm petiti.n under order XXrlr Rure 1 T/*.section ;":::::"rffi;]."l,. the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in rrpport of the petition, the High court may br: pleased to record the compromise between the parties and allow the appeal in terms of the Memorandum gf compromir" ov setting the aside the judgment and decree in o.s.No.g31 of 2017 dated 22t11t201g passed by the ll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District "i L.a.N"gar in the interest of justice. I Counselfor rthe Appellant :SRl p NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent : SRI C HARI PREETH The Court made the fottowing: COMIttrON ORDER a THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SIIAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISIINA REDDY I.A.No.1 of 2O25 in/and A.S.No.12 of 2O2O COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon'bb SriJustie Abhinand Kumar Shauili) When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent have informed the Court that the matter has been settled between the parties out of the \ Court.

2. To demonstrate that the case has been settled between the parties, the parties have filed Memorandum of Compromise, dated LO.O3.2O25 and accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2025 has been filed to record the compromise between them and contended that by allowing I.A.No.1 of 2025, the present Appeal may be t disposed of.

3. This Court, having considered the submissions made by the parties, is of the view that I.A.No.1 of 2025 and the present Appeal can be disposed of in I I I ( 2 terms of Memorandum of Compromise, dated 1O.O3.2O25 filed by the parties.

4. With the above observations, I.A.No. 1 of 2O25 is alloued and accordingly, the Appeal is disposed of by recording the terms of the Memorandum of Compromise. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if anr,, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- P. GOWRI SHANKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The ll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy Dishict at LB Naga(With records, if any)

2. One 3C to SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One'3C to SRI C HARI PREETH, Advocate.[OPUC] 4. Two C:D Copies ADK hy I titi,ri ; .r1' a\ -drqBrF { .1 ,"'', n l: a rl t $ I. . ..;a .:..r I a r'1t .E*-,,,,. r' ...iilI? .' .7' HIGH C;OURT DATEDT:2010812025 COMMON ORDER l.A.No.1 of 2025 ln/and AS.No.1l2 of 2020 1XP.l S l \ () 2 t tNl ?[16 * * DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT IN TERMS OF MEMORANDUM OF COII,IPROMISE AND ALLOWING THE l.A.No.1 of 2025 WITHOUT COSTS / / t l \ 6 [ 34e0 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY l.A.No.l of 2025 ln/and APPEAL SUIT NO: 12 OF 2020 Between: KaoaRaieshReddv,s/oLateKapaJanardhanRed.dy,age.4S..years,Ri/o.F.l'No' - Hastiha.puram .Ngrth' b-7-6dd['dls"ittl-etrcaieo rriod,l Employees gglo-!y, karmlnsh"t, Sirooinigar Mandal, Rania Reddy Distri6t, Rep by its GPa Holder A Prashanthi, W/o KaPa Rajesh ReddY ...AppellanUDefendant AND Smt Kapa Vijayamma, Wo Late. H.No. 8-7-93/NE/55/1, Educated Mandal, Ranga ReddY District. Kapa Janardhan Reddy, Aged 69 years, Rl/o Tribal Employees Karriranghat, Saroornagar ..RespondenUPlai ntiff Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated '. 2}t11l2}1g made in O.S.No.831 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar.- i lA NO: 1 ()F 2025 Petition under order XX, Rure 3 R/w section 151 nt^D^ - the circumstances stated in n. ,o,^;.; ;_: courr may be, ":::::iJ:":1^T:avit appeal in i:erms , ;- ;r":'" the Memo'rnor, judsment o"l' "no uection 1il of cpc praying that in rired in support or the petition, the Hish the parties and allow the tIIe.compromisebetwee "r;;;;:"Jr:n i:,:",:,,;;;:#:,",".;::l[iti."j,,31J,ff ffi ffi1i],:"ffi lA NO: 1 OF 2O2S petition or cPc pravins that the The aplleat and miscellant under Order XXlll Rule 3 R/w Section 15 'u., Hish court nrav be preased to pass ;;::::": :il::ffi "J[:.":: *:i: : i;, i "1;H'', j:- :;t ]: [#ffi;, : J t.No.1 of 2O2S on the file of the High Court. "; ;l;'JXlLi:Hs this dav ror orders as to settrement in the presence *='o, Advocate for the appellant and of sRt c HAR! PREETH, Advocate for ,l ;:T:i"j:JTf i j[:.,,:,.ffi:,.::.:^""T;#fi ,:TTiTll;i,T,ff :: of compromiru ,,nt"..];':'_:'u into between;;"; Jn"J;;"r1* judsment o",ntured in terms the memorandum court to pass a decre "no il;",|'", ;;;,""::i,T ffi#"f#,"J ffi H f:fl{tj m f "ll,tr compromise that the parties herein ;J"""_:::'. :t:' the said memorandum of matter out or courr in terms ,urornffi:1r#"T[: ,lu,"o ,n" This court Dorh Record the ,"r, ;;;*-Ftomis" il:::,i:":nojJ:.0"d n the .,., o i"]; ffiI tr::i,l;:,ffiH: ::_ compromis" o".r",.,..dcil;:: ##:H= ::,H: ;, ;r;:: #,il.",_um ffi;. "no I I i i I I I t- i : t , I I I t I --.-- ,| L-

1. That the Appeal Suit be and hereby is disposed of;

2. rhat the Respondent has no objection to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment and decree in o.s.No.831 of 201T dated 22-11-zo1g passed by the ll Additional Distret Judge. Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar;

3. That the Respondent is inclined to continue the Gift Deed in fhvour of the Appellant by dectaring that the Appellant is the absolute owner of the Suit Schedule Property;

4. That the Respondent also relinquished her rights over the suit schedule proPertY. s. That the brother of the Appellant named Kapa Venkateswara Reddy is residing in two rooms of the part of the schedule property. He did not perform marriage. He is entitled to live in the two rooms during his life time. But the property tax should be paid by Appellant.

6. That the After life time of the brother of the Appefiant named Kapa Venkateswara Reddy, Appellant will occupy the said two rooms. T. 'lhat in case the schedule property is developed, 30% space should be allotted to the brother of the Appellant Kapa venkateswara Reddy and he is entitled [o enjoy the possession of the same during his life time without having alienation powers. t a.

8. That the in case the Appellant sells the schedule property, 30o/o share of the sale consideration should be given to K.Venkateswara Reddy.

9. That the Appellant shall execute necessary register document to the eJfect that he has given possession of 3oo/o share of the schedule property I :I 7 w'ithout having alienation powers enabling to enjoy the possession during his life time. 1O.Tlrat the Respondent gifted one plot No.2s0, extent 244.44 sq.yards, situated at Vishnu Priya Nagar colony, Kallur village and Mandal, Kurnool District vide Gift Deed dated 17-08-2019 in favour of sister of Appellant named K. Rajeswari and the Appellant should not question the same in future.. 1 1. That as per the unddrstandings between the parties, the Appellant along wilh his brother Kapa Venkateswara Reddy sold the plot No.41g admeasuring 277 sq.yards, situated at Nadergul village, Balapur Mandal, Rernga Reddy District on nominal piice.

12.That the Both this parties voluntarily signed Memorandum of compromise without any coercion and undue influence by any one.

13. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal *SD/. P. GOWRT SHANKAR DEPUW REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The tt t\dditional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar 2. Two CD Copies ^DK ry t l HIGH I}OURT DATED:20/08/2 25 DECREE l.A.No.l ot 2025 In/and AS.No.12 of 202 0 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT !N TERMS OF MEMORANDUM OF COMPROMISE AND ALLOWING THE !.A.No.1 ot 2025 WITHOUT COSTS II \