The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Rep- by its P.P, High Court of Telangana through P. S. Bommalaramaram Rachakonda Commissionerate.

2. N. Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy Aged about 53 years. Occ.Lorry Driver R/o. Peddaparvathapuram (Village), Bommalaramaram (lVandal) Yadadri-Bhongir District. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the lt/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in SC No. 416 oI 2022 on the file of lAdditional District and Sessions Judge, Yadadri-Bhongir District at Bhongir. ...Respondent LA. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased grant interim stay of all further proceedings in S.C.No.46'l of 2022 on the file of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Yadadri Bhongir District at Bhongir, pending disposal of main criminal petition. E-EE kt-:r .- - r'' i l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: N. Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy Aged abou. :)3 years. Driver R/o. PeCdaparvathapuram (Village), Bommitli;ramaram Yadadri-Bhongir District. Occ. Lorry (lt/la nd ai) ..Petitioner/Respondent in l.ilr.l'los.2 and 3 of 2025 AND 1 . tvlarri Shyam Kumar Reddy, S/o. Ivlohan Reddy, ageo i;bout 38 years, Occ .Agriculture.

2. Marri Rajamani, t/y'/o. Mohan Reddy Aged about 60 yea-s Occ.Agriculture- All are R/ o. Rangapuram (Village), Bommalaramar;; nr (fiilandal), Yadadri- Bhongir District .RespondenUPetitioners in l.,lt.',los.2 and 3 of 2025

3. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its P.P, High Court of P.S. Bommalaramaram Rachakonda Commissionerate. '-t langana through ...Respondents/Respondents in l.,lr.l'los.2 and 3 of 2025 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying tha.. irr the circumstances stated in the tlrlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitior. l.he High Court may be pleased to grant permission to file the present Crimin rl Petition seeking to quash the proceedings in SC No.461 of 2022 on the file of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Yadadri-Bhongir District at Bho-rg r, in view of the compromise and to accord permission between Petiti lrrers/A1 & A3 and Respondent No.2, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying tha1. itt the circumstances stated in the [Vtemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitior the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise between Petiti,:rnr:rs/ Al & 43 and Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant herein to quash S;C No.461 of 2022 on the file of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Yada it Bhongir District at Bhongir, on such terrns and conditions as this Hon'ble Cou't rieem fit. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing; t re Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argurrernts of Sri L.Harish, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao \,'er)ramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 , r: nrj of Sri A.Govinda Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER 3t*P,, ' lrrlFF:rlEF a,r ! ; i - l THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.1 1813 of 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 3 under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS'), seeking to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.461 of 2022 on the file of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Yadadri-Bhongir District at Bhongir

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 3 as well as respondent No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal ,Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that he has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter -'-.FF.*F' \. .'-l'3"a-.'; 2 into compronrisc, they were grven a chance to sel r(r the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel befor : the High Court Legal Servicers Committee for the State of Telan<:;t'ra vlde orders dated 12.09.2025 passed by this Court. The Secri,ti'iry, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the partit. r,; and submit a report to that effc:ct

5. Pursuarrt to the above said direction issued [;',' this Court, the parties along with their respectrve counsel have app -'::red before the High Court Legal Servrces Committee for the State c:f -elangana and the Secretary o{ the above said Authority identifiecr t re parties and submitted a rep,rrt dated 17.09.2025 stating that ll), ) parties were identified and they have willfully and without any r.r>.:rcion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2(t',]-t; ate allowed Consequently the Crrminal Petition is allowed and h'-' proceedings in S.C.No.4tl1 of 2022 on the file of I Additiontrl District and Sessions Judge, Yadadri-Bhongir District at Bhon, 1ir, registered against the petitroners/accused Nos.1 and 3, are 're reby quashed subject to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 3 payir g an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the ,iccretary, High ,. 3 Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5'000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:SBlN002OO7O, IVICR No 500004057), within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the RegistrY.

7. tViscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed' SD/- B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 4L 'L The IAddiditional District and Sessions Judge,Yadadri-Bhongir at Bhongir 2. The Additional Judicial First Calss Magistrate at Bhongir. 3. The Station House Officer, Bommalaramaram Police Station, Yadadri Bhongtr District.

4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. One CC to Sri L.Harish, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri A.Govinda Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies (Along with copy of joint memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs.10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri L.Harish. Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 06.10.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only )to the Telangana Hrgh Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 112293 of 2025. -- i1 " ,, \/ " j1{Eh1"; .,.$ffi,# HIGH COURT DATED:0611012025 .._)' '. 'rli liji ?ilffi COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 o12025 ln/And CRLP.No.11813 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION ,\trlD l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 ( @, \(, - t IN THtr HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA -AI HYDERABAD CRLP No. of 2025 Against SC No. 461 of 2022 On the file of Hon'blc I Adcll- District and Scssions Judge, yadadri-Bhongir District, at Bhongir ) Between:

1. Marri Shyarn I{umar Reddy S/o. Mohan Reddy, aged about'3S years, Occ :Agricultut-e

2. Marri Rajamani !V/o. Moh:rn Reddy Aged about 60 ycars, Occ: Agriculture, Both are R/o. Rangapuram (V), Bommalaramaram (M), Yadadri-Bhorrgir Dislrict. .. . Perit ioners/A I & 43 A i\ID

1. The State of Telangana Rep. by its P.P,High Court of Telangana ThroughP.S. Bommalaramaram Rachakonda Commissionerate.

2. N. Narsimha Reddy S/O Krishna Reddy Agcd about 53 Yrs. Occ: Lorry Driver R/O Peddaparvathapuram (V), Bommalaramaram (M) Yadadri-Bhongir District. ... Respondent/Defacto-Complainant. ... Respondent/Compiainant JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AND RESPONDENT NO. 2 It is submitted that Petitioners/Accused No. 1 & 3 and Respondent No.1/Defacto-Complainant trerein compromised the matter out of court, at the intervcntion of elders and well-wishers and in view of said compromise, : they do not warrt to further proceed rvith SC No. 461 of 2022, on the fi1e of Hon'b1e I Aclditio4al District and Sessions Judge, yadadri-Bhongir Dibtrict b1 9'-/^ O'w{f,",4. r-ely ,'("^ p at Bhongir , as such this Hor-r'ble Court may be : lcased to record the compromise bctrveen petitioners /A 1&A3 ald Res,r,;1dgn1 No.2/Defacto_ complainant herein and qr-rash the proceeclings agair- s t tl.r c,r in SC No. 461 ol 2022, on rl,rc file of Hon,blc i Aclditional Distri, I ancl Sessions Judge, Y:rdadri Bhongir. Dlstrjct i1t ljhonsir. Hcncc this N,lcmo *a1/' '. RESIr( )l,IDEN'l' No.2 (>- n lh)'-{)-!9 PETITIONER No. 1 f4. oa,H 1>o 9r PETITIONBR No. 2 COU EL FOIi THE PETITIONERS. COUNSI'L FOR REIiI,ONDENT No.2 : I l I I l I : ! ; I