Judgment of the Hon,ble Supreme Court in K. Gopi vs The Sub-Registrarr and requested to pass simiiar order

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate wrrt, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lr,4andamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.6 in refusing the regrstration and documentation and passed the refusal order through vide No. 2 of 2025, daled 1010712025 on the purchased plot of the Petitioner to an extent of 1'1 1 Sq. Yards in Plot No.76lA, in Survey Nos.29' 35 and 36, which is situated at Ranjit Paradise, Koheda Village, Abduallapurmet l\,4andal, Ranga Reddy District on the ground that the Petitioner is not having the Link Deed Document is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Prirciples of Natural Justice and set aside the refusal order through vide No. r)2 of 2025 dated 1010712025 and consecluently direct the Respondent No.6 to r-. ease the regular Sale Deed on the purchased plot of the Petitioner to an exten of 111 Sq. Yards in Plot No.76/A, in Srrvey Nos.29, 35 and 36, which is s tuated at Ranjit Paradise, Koheda Villagre, Abduallapurmet lMandal, Ranga RelCy Dlstrict. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Sc,ction 151 CPC praying that in the circ umstances stated in the affidavit filed in s'upport of the petition, the High Court rray be pleased to direct the Respondent \o.6 to release the regular Sale Deec on the purchased plot of the Petitioner tc an extent of 111 Sq. Yards in Plot Nc.76/A, in Survey Nos 29, 35 and 36, rvhich is situated at Ranlit Paradise Koheda Village. Abduallapurmet It4andal, Ranga Reddy District pending dit;lrosal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.UDIT NARAYAN, REP. FOR SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: SMT S.SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR STAMPS & REGISTF ATION The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITI ON No. 27+30 of 2O2S ORDER: Heard Sri D.Udit Narayan, jearned Counsel representing learned Counsel for the petitioner on record and Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Rcgrstration appearing for the respondents and pcru secl the entire material on recorcl. \\,'ith their conse,t. thrs u.r.it petition is disposed of at the sl ergc of admission

2. Learned Counsel lor the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.p.No. 163 10 of 2019 and batch dated 11.O1.2023 and also the recen t Judgment of the Hon,ble Supreme Court in K. Gopi Vs. The Sub-Registrarr and requested to pass simiiar order in this writ petition ' 2O2S SCC Online SC 74O 2 SI(,J -- W.P .'1o.2743O of 2O25 3 Learned Assistant Government ple ader for Stamps and Registration has not rlisprrted the submission made by the learned Colr:rsel lor the petitioner He submits thzrt tl-re petitio ter has not submitted the document belore the respor.rcl rr-rts and i[ he submits the document. thev have to const:ler the SAINC subject to complialce of the provisions of ttr : Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 4 Thr: relevant portion of the order in W.P.No.16310 of 2Ol9 and batch dated . 1.01.2023 is as under:

13. Thr: pou'er of the registering authorirr. lo refrrsc regis.r-ation rs onh, if anr oI rhe grounds ol objectjons tha] ar( :itumcrated under the provisions of the ReeisrlaLion Act, 190U. ilI1 thc IlLrles marie tl.rcreLrndcr in partt(.Lllar Scctiirrs 19. 20. 21, 22 .\ .l-1, l5 rtncl rulc 5[3 ol thc'lclangana liules rutrlcr tht' Ilt:gisllalroD /.( t. lg0g, are existinq in tcsltcctt oI ln-r sLrr.lr alocLu]tcnt pr.r,scr ' ,1 lirr thc rcgisllillir)n. !-xc('p1. tllc 9rr-rtrntls ot {)l)jc(.li()t)s that ;r:-, ,trLllt(,tatc(l uD(lcr th, pt'()\lslolts ol tllc [?e!]LsltiLtiolr /\(.r . l()()J. 1l ( ( LLsL(,nltg ilLl:hr)Trti(s hrlc no aLLtlrot it\ to r.( llst icglstrlllioll i)l lt i)(.Liilt(.itt on itrt'. otltt't gr,rLtrtrL As rLlrcitch rtolr.ti i1l)o\(. llt(.groLtLt(i () .,rltLr ir the irtltttgttct rt lusal orclers in all tltL,sc bal(.lt o1 \\'r Ll ) r tL,rrrs .irL- llasseri rs that tltc link tior Ltrrenl sltrttn in Iit( tesl)((.ti\ , ,)(.u:lte.lLS is a raliclateci :rncl an rrrtregistcrrrrl clo<:urrtcrl. lir loo.ite l-lr.) a ralrrlirr ol thu link docul'ncnt. thc regist('ring aruth,trirr . rn(lrecth reril-rir-rg ,r'ht,ther the executants ol Lhe rcspectlve cloc inenis trre hartng valrd litle or not to execute rlte documents in I leslioo. As 3 w.p.No.2z4so "r i{;1, helcl irr thc abovc refer.recl .iudgment ir.r thc case of Dr. yadla Ratnesi.l Naidu (1 supral, tho registcrrng.rrrLhorit-\ is not entirled to go into the lille ol the parties to the tJocume,t. IL is a scttled lau, tha[ the'endee under a documcnt \.ill not gct a l)clter titlc than his vendor and in casc if vendor is not havin .re subject marrer or,,i,:..,;l':J.j.il: ff :.":::TJ:i;. ' said documenl does not get anl, title over such property and mere registration oI such document wi]l not have an effect on the property which is the subject matter o, the sard document.

14. As righth, concecjed by the learned Government pleader for stamps and Registration, the registering authorities are not entitied to refuse registration of a document on mere ground that the title of the executants of the respectjve document is based upon the validated document, though the same is compulsorily registerable document cannot be accepted and such a ground is not avairabre to the registering authorjries ro rcfuse registration oI a dor:ument on tirat grou rrd. lo hold rclusc

19. In thc light ol.thc irbovc. tlris Court is unhesitant lhal lile rcsi)olt(lenl reqistet-l]-rg ar]tho_jttes arc not cntltle(l Lo rcglstra(ron of it (locttnlenl oD tltc gr.ound that thc link documc,.l rt--lerrr:d to in thc rcspe,clivc (locurI1.nl is a validateri document or to |clLrsc rcgislration oI sur enrrorsement, .ror",r 02 oi ;:r;':::::;'.:t,.:':i::,":l';: i: Inspector General of Stamps anrJ Registration. Accorclingly, the impugned orclers in the respective Writ petitions are set aside and Writ PetiLions are allou,ed u.ith a further directjon to the respondent registering authorities to receive rhe returned clocuments and to process the satne subject to the condtrion of lhe said documents complf ing with the provisions of the Registration Act, lgog and the Indian Stamp Act, 1g99 ,. : i.-i,:.r,::::i-.. . ,-. . - rr- \ 4 SI(,J w.P.N t.2743O of 2O25 5 in K. Gopi's case (supra i), the Hor:'ble Supreme Court held as under "The registering oflicer is not concerned \\'ith th' trrlc l.iclcl br, thc (--xecrrta .rt. He has no adjudic:atorl po\\'cr lo clecrdr: r hclher rhe executant hrs any titie. Even ri an exccLrtant execLltes :r sale cleecl or a Iease i L'i r,rspect of a lar-rd in re spect o[ u hich he hai ro title , the registering o1licer cannot refuse to reglster the docLrrri( nt iI all the procedural r:ompliances are made and the neccssar-v sL rrnp dutv as ra'e1l as registration charges/fee are paicl. We ma1, nr e here [hal under the sr:heme of the i9O8 Act, it is not the lunctior of lhe SLrb- Registrar or Registering AuthoriL\' Lo ascertain \\'l.reLhcr :l.re vendor has title to the propert-v r'vhich he is seeking to transf, i Oncc the registering authority is satislied lhat the parties to the I )cument are present llef()re him and the parties admit exectrtion tlereof before hirl, suLlec', to making procedural compliances as nar ated above, the doculent must be registered. Thc execution and reil s-ratiorl of a document have the effect of transferring onh, those ri thrs, li any, that the exeaLltant possesses. Il the excclltant has r.io 'glt. ti1lc, or interest i11 the propert\,, the regislerc(l rlocLlrncnl citlrrr(,t cffecl an! t ra: r sfe r. 6 In vje',r. of the order passed in W.I']No.1631C) ol 20I 9 and balch dated 1 1.01.2023 and also - re Judgment of the Hon'bl,: Supreme Court in K. Gopi's crse (supra 1) and for the reasons mentioned therein. the Writ Petition 1S disposed of directing the respondent eL.rthorities to receive and register the sale deed presented by the petitioner in respect of the subject plot u''ithout reference to the intima.tion of Relusal Order. dated I ) 07 .2025 of .\/ 5 w.e.n..zztso q ztf;i"s the pending Document No.p.3S/202S and subject to condition of the said document complying with the provisions of the Registration Act, 19Og and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. There shall be no order as to costs. 7 Misceilaneous petrtions, if any pending in this wrtt pet.ition, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// S S /-P. PONNA KRISHNA STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registra o Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telang a 2 3 4 5 6 7 I The Commissioner, Stamps and Registration Department, Telangana State, Hyderabad. The lnspector General, Stamps and Registration Department, Telangana, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. The Sub-Registrar, Pedda Amberpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate IOPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR STAIVPS & REGISTRATION, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] o BSR GJP Two CD Copies N'/ HIGH COURT DATED: 12109t2025 ORDER WP.No.27430 of 2O2S lI4r \.i,. a\ 0[0tT20fr !) l I -.. .,.- ' _.-/ --,i/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS \