Khammam District v. A.P.S.R.T.C., Kothagudem
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 22 Oct 2008
- Bench
- R SUBHASH REDDY
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.K.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.P.RAJANI REDDY The Court made the following :
ORDER:
Operative part
This writ petition is filed questioning order dated 22-04-1999 passed by the appellate authority in the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner but however no copy of the order of his removal from the service passed by the disciplinary authority is placed on record. When the matter has come up for hearing on 10-09-2008, it was adjourned enabling the counsel for petitioner to file a copy of the removal of the petitioner from service passed by the disciplinary authority. It appears from the record that till date no such copy is filed as ordered and there is also no representation when the matter is called. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 22nd October 2008 CVRK _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 22 Oct 2008. The bench was R SUBHASH REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.