Metukupally Venkat Ram Reddy v. '1 . The State of Telangana

2. The Superintendent of Police, Medchal - Malkajgiri District' 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, IVledchal - t\ilalkaigiri Diskict' 4. The Circle lnspector of Police, PS Pocharam lT Corridor' 5. The Sub-lnspector of Police, PS Pocharam lT Corridor' 6. Sri. B. Raju, The Circle lnspector of Polce PS Pocharam lT Corridor' T.SrilV.ShivaKrishna,TheSub-lnspectorofPolicePSPocharamlTCorridor 8. Ravula Dayakar Reddy, S/o R. lvladhusudhan Reddy' Aged.abou!41 Years' " iji". arlrtiJ nyo. H.i'to.z-t '1 8/a' Subhash Nagar colonv' Ne.a-r Bangaru Milr.;; T"*pf., Cnuif."t.t lr/landal, Bodupfal, tr/edchal - tt4alkajgiri District.

9. Dammalapati Narasimha Rao, S/o-D Narasimha ftro ASed.abog! 51 years' " o;;. BGGis, R/o. H.No 2-119, Subhash Nagar Colonv' Near.Bangaru T"ilpre, veolpirtv Mandal, Boduppal, Medchal - Malkajgiri il;;;;; District.

10.Doli Mallaiah Ravi Prasad, S/o Doli ti4allaiah Aged aboqt 72 yeals'. Occ Retd '- G;;.'E.obvee Ryo n. t'lt.)-s-ssol303, lDBl Bank ATIrI Lane Subedari' Hanamkohdi Warangal - 506001. t I I I I I I I I i i 11 S. P. Annap,:orna, Wio D-..M. Ravi prasad Aged about 50 years, Occ. Housewife Rb H. No. 2-249, p ocharam vit all-cnattesar'tr,rintat, N/alkajgiri Disrtrict. -Medchar - .....RESPONDENTS Petition Unde'r Articre 226 oI the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances staterd in the affrdavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a rrurit, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of lrrlandamus rJecraring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 5 in interfering with the civil dispr:es in respect of the prot bearing No. 190, admeasuring 200 Sq.Yds. in Sy.36 i)art, situated at Chaitanya Nagar, phase _ ll, At pocharam Village and t\rlu n icip,a Iity Ghatkesar r\,4andar, Ir/edchar-tr/iarkajgiri District, pendrng between myself arrrJ the Respondents No. g to 11 by supporting them , without following due procc'ss of raw and without considering my orar representations as illegal, arbitrary anrl vioratrve of principres of naturar justice and Articres 19, 21 and 300 A of constitution of India besides violative of principles of natural justice and consequentl'y direct the Respondent No.2 to 5 not to interfere with the civil disputes pending br:tween the petitroner and Respondents No. 6 to g. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to drrect the Resporrdr>nts not to interfere with the civir disputes pending between the Petitioner and Respondent No. B to 11 which is not in jurisdiction of respondent no 2 to 5 in respect of the plot bearing No. 1g0, admeasuring 200 Sq.Yds. in Sy.36 Part, situated at Chaitanya Nagar, phase _ ll, At pocharam Village and [Vlun ir:ipr a rity Ghatkesar I\4andar, Ir/edcha r-tr/a rka jg iri District, pending disposal of writ pertilion. Counsel for the Petiti.ner : SRt y.SAl TEJA, ADVOCATE FOR SRt KTRAN PALAKURTHI counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7 : SRr C.ANTKETH REDDY, AGp FoR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.g to 11 : _ The Court made the following ORDER '.sx_ a*&*r THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUI{ARAMJI WRIT PEf,ITION No.27437 OF 2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition is liled under Article 226 of Corstitution of India seeking the following relief/s. '... pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more panicularly-one in the nature of wdt of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 5 in interfering with the civil disputes in respect of the p1o9 bearing No' 190, admeasuring 200 Sq.Yds. in Sy.36 Parq situated at Chlitanla Nary1 Phase - II, At lochanm Village' and Murucipaliry Ghatkesar Mandal, Ivledchal-lvhlkajgiri District, p".tdittg b.t e"n mlself- and the Respondena No. 8 to 1r by si.rpponmg them, without following due process of law and vdthout conside.l"g -i oral representatiors as illegal, arbitnry and violative of principles of natural justice and Anicles 19, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India besides violadve of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respon&nt No.2 to 5mot to interfere with the civil disputei pending between the Petitioner and Respondena No. 6 to 9 or to pass...... ." 2 Fleard Iv{r.Y.Sai Teja, leamed counsel rePresenting Mr.Kinn Palakrfthi, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.CAnileth Reddy, leamed fusistant Govemment Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 7. 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submis that respondent Nos. 2 to 5, i.e., the police authorities, are interfering in a civil dispute relating to a house plot that is the subject matter of a suit 2 pending befc,re the leamed Principal Jwrior Gvil Judge, Medchal_ Ma[<aigri Disrrict. It is further alleged that, without any legal justification, the police have been insisting upon the petitioner to reach a sefilerlent with the unofficial respondents herein.

4. Leamed l\ssistant Govemment pleader for Home, on the other hand, submits that the respondent/police authorities have never inrervene,l in any civil dispute, as alleged by the petitioner, nor have the',, clirected or compelled the petitioner to arrive at a settlement. It is contended that the allegatiors made in the petition are unsupponed by material evidence and rest solely on r'rnsubstantiated aver:rnenrs in the pleadings. Accordingly dis miss al of the petition ir; sought. 5 I have care{ullyperused the materials placed on record.

6. In view ol the petitioner's assertions, the pendency of the civil dispute bef,:,r.e the competent civil court, and having regard to the limited roie ,if the police authorities in such maners, this court finds it approprJate to direct the respondent/police authorities not \ 3 to interfere in the civil dispute berween the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. The police shall furher refrain from insisting upon or compeliing the petitioner to enter into any sefilement. Nevertheless, it is clarified that this order shall not preclude the respondent/police from taking any action strictly in accordance with law, should such action become necessary' 'S0ith 7 this direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no orrder as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitiors, pending if any, shdl stand closed' //TRUE COPY// SD/. . GOWRI SHANKAR ANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal secretary, Home Department, secretariat Bldgs BRKR Bhavan, State of Telangana at HYderabad.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Medchal - fi/lalkajgiri District 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, tt/edchgl- Jt/alkajg iri District. 4. The Cir;leinspector of Police, PS PocharamlT- Corridor' 5. The Sub-lnspector of Police, PS Pocharam IT C^orridor' 6. The Circle lnspector of Police PS Pocharam lT Corridor' 7. The Sub-lnspector of Police PS Pocharam lT Corridor e. fwo CCs to 'GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI e. O;e CC to SRI KIIRAN PALAKURTHI, Advocate [OPUC] 10.Two CD CoPies o To SA GJ I I it ::' i{) '!) -i:=::1:--- ...-..,\,-,--::\ .4_,1lt I''- :. Y - -\ ,;' .. . ')'. '. a-... t 0I 0rI 2stf sD4rcttf : \>{ HIGH COURT DATED:1 110912025 ORDER WP.No.27437 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. 0