✦ High Court of India · 22 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 22 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
22 Dec 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,076 words

No.33, SBH Colony, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad-500073, Telangana.

2. K.V.Sesha Reddy, S/o. K.Pitchi Reddy, Aged 65 years, Occ. Business, Native of Mudivarthi Village, Vidavalur Mandal, Nellore District, presently residing at Plot No.33, SBH Colony, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad-500073, Telangana. AND 1 State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, At Secretariat, Hyderabad. ..PETITIONERS The District Collector, At Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 2 3. The Tahsildhar, Gandimaisamma Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

4. Sargari Veera Reddy, S/o. Late S.Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o. Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. i

5. Sargari Krishna Reddy, S/o. Late S.Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, R/o. Bowrarnpet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District.

6. Sargari Raji Reddy, S/o. S.Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, Fl/o. Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. )

7. Sargari Ravinder Reddy, S/o. S.Penta Reddy, Fi/o. Bowrampet Village rGand imaisa m ma-D Malkajgiri District. Aged Major, Occ. Business, undigal Mandal, Medchal- B. Sargari Ranga Reddy, S/o. S.Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, Ri./o. Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

9. Sargari Bheem Reddy, S/o. S.Penta Reddy, Aged Major, Occ. Business, Fl/o. Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

10.Kolan Yadi Reddy, S/o. Late K.Tulsi Reddy, Aged Majo' Occ. Business,. Rl/o. H.No.1-13l3, Tullsi Villa, Nizampet, Near Govt. Schct l, Nizampet Village' DundigalGandimaisamma Manda[, Medchal-Malkajgiri Di trict. '1 l.Smt.K.Sreelatha Reddy, S/o. K.Mahipal Reddy, D/o S.Yella Reddy'.Aged about- 32 years, Oci. Hor.rsewife, Fl/o. H.No.'1-13/l Nizampet Village, Quthubullapur, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

12.B.Subba Reddy, S/o. Narasimha Reddy, Aged at'r ut 49 years, Occ' Business, Fyo. H.No.3-4 1 7/2, Sheshadri Nagar' Kukatpz I y, Hyderabad.

13. Police Govinda Reddy, S/o. Raghunandan Reddy, Agerl rbout 59 years, Occ. Business, Fyo. H.N6.2-72, Bowrampet Village, Dun'i3al-Gandimaisamma Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

14. N.srinivas Reddy, S/o. Pandurangareddy, Aged 38 1'r ars, Occ. Business, Bourampet, Ganlimaisamma-Dundig; I Mandal, Medchal- - R/o. H.No.3-85, Malkajgiri District. l5.Akinaboyina Nagaraju, S/o. Ramalingayya, Aged 44 / :ars, Occ Business, Fyo. s-44, Bahaduipally, GandimaGa'mma Dunding3 Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District.

16.Mandha Pradeep Reddy, S/o. M.Ravinder Reddy, ,1 led 44 yeers, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Ptot No.308, A-Block, Subishi ( ovutham, Kompalle, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, IVIedchal-Malkajgiri t istrict.

17. M/s. M.V.V.Housing Society, Rep. by its Mulla I rdi Veera Venkata Satyanarayana, Aged SZ year-, R/o. 4-68-3, Lawsons Ei; y Colony, L.B.Nagar, Visikhapalnam (Urban), Andhra Pradesh-53001 7. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndi, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh Court may be. pleased to grant an order, direction or writ, more so in the rature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in unblc< <ing certain survey numbers for entertaining and registering the sale dee,i; presented by the Respondents No.14 to '1 7, despite knowing the fact that ttrr transactions on the said survey numbers were blocked on the applications mit e by the Petitioners under Court Case lntimation in Dharani Portal under diffe 'ent applications, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and consequently, direct the Respondent No.3 not to give i ny effect to the Sale Deeds bearing Doc.Nos.387l2023,38812023 and 38912023, all dated 0110912023 in view of Court Case lntimation in Dharani Portal vid: Nos.C12300019802' C12300020057, C|2300019842 and C|2300020054 dated 2i to412023 filed by the Petitioners and also direct the Respondent No.3 to : rntinue the blocked transactions of the lands in respect Survey Nos. 537 t"D/<t1 , 371eo/e"f , $7 tubf 1, s37ro/e/2, s37teo/ty't, 537t@/y2, 5371-fl2, 537t@/8/4. 537tv/a . *7t E+ , fi7te , 537/ "i , 5371 6, and 537/61, of Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri ' District, admeasuring Ac.4-19 Gts. situated Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District which are reflecting in the names of Respondents No.4 to 15 and 17, pursuant to the Applications made by the Petitioners with regard to Court Case lntimation in Dharani lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to continue the blocked transactions of the lands in respect of Survey Nos. 537/ty'./ , 5371-/-h, *7tu/at/1 , 537h4'/2, 5371"t/8/l , fi7t-43, *7tE8/4, s37tb/d,537t 4$ . fi7t C , 537lA , 537i &and fi7W, 537/ &r of Bowrampet Village, Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, which are reflecting in the names of Respondents No.4 to 15 & 17, pursuant to the Applications made by the Petitioners with regard to Court Case lntimation in Dharani, pending disposal of this writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI ROHIT POGULA Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 10 & 12: SRI N. VENKATESHWARA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No. 14 : SRI K. PRADEEP REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 6,7 to 9, 11,13, 15 to 17: -- ) The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF I ELANGANA AT TTYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E'V.VE]!I UGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.29 88O of 2O2 I Dated: 22.L2.2O25 Between: J.Vamsi Krishna and another And The State of Telangana, Represented by its SecretarY, Revenue Department artd sixteen others )etitioners Respondents ORDER Mr.Rohit Pogula, learned counsel for the cetitioners, by addressing a letter to the Registrar (Judicial), {igh Court for - this Court to the State of Telalgana, sceks permission o withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. Permission is accorded . 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is lismissed as withdrawn. There sha,ll be no order as to costs Miscellarr.eous closed. petitions pending, if arL , shali stand \ SD/.S, AS li\f ALLIKARJUNA RAO srANT REGIgTEAK //TRUE COPY// t\ ECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI ROHIT POGULA' Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI N. VENKATESHWARA RAO' Advocat: IOPUCI --

3. One CC to SRI K. PRADEEP REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana.

5. Two CD Copies PVL BS l#, / }. HIGH COURT DATED:2211212025 \ \ ',-. .--':= L) 0 5 lr i 'ii2ii 1 -ll '!l * )i: S)...,r.. I 'll + ,.; ?:1 ' .:lr' \:'-:../' ORDER WP.No.29880 of 2023 l. DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments