Chundu Suresh v. 1. The State of Telangana

5. Kancheti Nagendramma, Wo Srinivasa Rao, Aged 70 years, occ- House wife, Rl/o Gammadidurru Village, Penuganchiprolu (lV), NTRI District.

6. Chennupati Bhavana, D/o Venkateswara Rao, Aged 25 years, occ- Student, Rl/o Remidicharla Village, Yenupalem Mandal Khammam District.

7. Koneru Manjula, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Aged 54 years, occ- House wife, R/o H.No. 9-73/1 , Srinivasa Nagar, Maduranagar Kaman, Nizampet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction of writ in the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes and in trying to execute the preliminary in OS No. 108 of 2014 on the file of Honourable Senior Civil Judge Court at Sathupally, in respect of suit schedule property therein in vide extent of (1) Ac. 7.O2 112 guntas in Sy Nos 28'll2, ': {:1.' : + _:?r!$t- -'- !t/ 2821A11, 282lAt\, (2) Ac 6.00 in Sy No. 59/E, (3) an exter of Ac. 026 guntas in Sy No. 4/El (Choppa Doddi), and (a) SB Sq yards at Rr:nidicherta Village of Yerrupalam Mandal, Khammam District, as illegar arb tr: ry and against the principles of natural justice and consequenfly direct the i:rd respondent not to interfere in the c,ivil matters between the petitioner and prive e respondents herein in respect of lhe above properties, in the interest of justice. LA.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the r;irc umstances stated in the affidavit filerl in support of the petition, the High cou.: may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil .ratters between the petitioner and private respondents herein in respect of the r.r.operties vide extent of (1)Ac. 7.0211:Z guntas in Sy Nos 28112, 2B2tAt1,2BZlAA, t?)Ac.6.00 in Sy No. 59/E, (3) an externt of Ac 026 guntas in Sy No.4/El (Chop1,;1 Doddi), and (4) 58 sq Yards at Rernidicherla Village of yerrupalam Mandal, l,[rammam District,, in the interest of jus;tice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI p.RAMA SHARANA SHART/1A Cgylsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRI C.ANIKETH RE DDy, AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7 : - The Court made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TTII(ARAMJI I WRIT PETITION No,27245 OF 2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of C-onstirution of India seeking the following reliefls:- "... rc pass an order or direction of writ rr the nature of lvhndamus duly declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with rhe civi.l disputes and in rrying ro execure the pretiminary in OS No. 108 of 2014 on the file of Flonourable Senior Gvil Judge Coun at Sathupally, in respect of suit schedule propery therein in vide e*ent of (t) Ac. 7.02 1/2 guntas in Sy Nos 28112, 282/N1,282/AA" (2) Ac. 6.00 in Sy No. 59/E, (3) n extent of Ac. 026 gunas in Sy No. +/E1 (Choppa Doddf, and (+) 5A Sq YanCs at Remidicherla Village of Yem:palam N,hn&[, Khammam Districr, as illegal arbitrary and against the principles of namral jusrice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent nor ro interfere in rhe civil matrers berween the pedtioner and private respondents herein in respect of the above propenies, in the interest of iustice and to pass...... ."

2. Fleard Mr.P.Rarna Sharana Sharma, Ieamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.CAniketh Reddy, leamed fu sistant Govemment Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

3. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 3, the Station House Officer, Yerupalam Police Station, is interfering in civil disputes and attempting to execute the preliminary decree passed in O.S. No. 108 of. 20L4, whidh -is 2 pending before the C-ourt of the learned Seruor Cvil Judge, Satupally, in respect of the schedule properries. ( )n that basis, the petitioner seels appropriate directions from this (. tun.

4. Learned Assistant Govemmenr pleader f,r. Home submits that there has been no occasion for the respo.rclenm/police to interfere i, *y civil disputes and that the allegati:,ns made in the petition are turfounded and devoid of merit. 5 I have carefullypenued rhe materials placed ,rn record

6. Flaving regard to the assenions of the periti:rner, particularly the allegations of interference by respondent No. :, with respect to the properties forming the subject maner of O.S. i'.lo. 10g of 2014 on the file of the leamed Senior Gvil Judge Satupally, and considering the well-senled Iimitations on rhe rc . of the police authorities in maners of a civil narure, this (burt finds it appropriate to direct the respondent,/police, :rn:l in panicular -respondent No. 3, to refrain from interfe.i"g i" ,ie civil d.ispute , between the petitioner and the trnofficial respondents, save and except in strict accordance with law. 7 \X/ith this direction, this petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To V Hyderabad.

1. The Principal Secretary, (Home), Secretariat, Stat{of/Telangana at 2. The Superintendent of Police, Khammam District at Khammam. 3. The Station House Officer, PS Yerupalem, Khammam District. 4. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at 5. One CC to SRI P.RAMA SHARANA SHARMA, Advocate [OPUCJ 6. Two CD Copies ),(4-- Hyderabad. [OUT] SA PVL ::, l4l I i ?ISEPilffi f ; \.,, \:.' /7 :,1r ! HIGH COURT DATED:1 11091202s ORDER WP.No.2724S of ZO2S DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. @llr A q nl €