Criminal Revision Case No. 1771 of 2004 · Judicature Of Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
1. KCP Sugar & Industries Corporation Ltd., Vuyyuru rep.by G.P.A. sri K.Krishnan, O/o Chairman & Managing Director, KCPS &IC Vuyyuru, Krishna District A.P.
2. Government of A.P. rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad Respondent(s) The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the memo of grounds filed therein and the order of the High court dated 12-10-2004 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of MR.Prattipati Venkateswarlu, Advocate for the petitioner and of
Mr. K. Ravindra Kumar Advocate for R1 and of Public Prosecutor on behalf of the respondent No.2. The Court made the following :
ORDER:
“ Post them on Monday i.e, 22-11-2004 in motion list. Interim stay granted earlier is extended till then.” Sd/- Mohd. Ibrahim ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad 2. The Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad 3. KCP Sugar & Industries Corporation Ltd., Vuyyuru rep.by G.P.A. sri K.Krishnan, O/o Chairman & Managing Director, KCPS & IC Vuyyuru, Krishna District A.P.
Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad(OUT)
One Spare Copy HIGH COURT TCSRJ DATED: 19-11-2004 NOTE: POST ON 22-11-2004 in MOTION LIST ORDER CRL.R.C.NO. 1771 OF 1004 EXTENDING THE INTERIM STAY SKM Drafted ON: 19-11-2004 HIGH COURT TCSRJ DATED: 19-11-2004 NOTE: POST ON 22-11-2004 IN MOTION LIST ORDER CRL.R.C.NO. 1771 OF 1004 EXTENDING THE INTERIM STAY
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 401.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Dec 2004. The bench was T SURYA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.