High Court · 2025

Keesari Narsimhulu, S/o Late Sri K. Pochaiah, aged about 50 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H. No.2-131, Laxmapur Village, Muduchinthalapally Mandal [erstwhile Shameerpet Mandal] fvledchal District [erstwhile Ranga Reddy Districtl- 500101 ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 J The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Prl Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500063 The Commissioner of Po ce, Cyberabad Commissionarate, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500 032. The Deputy Commrssioner of Police, Balanagar Zone, Cyberabad Police, Balanagar, H'yderabad 500054.

4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pet-Basheerabad Division, Cyberabad, Secunderabad 500 067.

5. The Station House Officer, Shameerpet Poltce Station, Cyberabad Comm issiona rate, Shameerpet, Medchal District

6. Keesari Pochaiah, S/o Late K. Yadagiri, aged about 60 Years, Occ. Business, R/o Laxmapur, N,4uduch inthalapa lly I\,4andal, tr/edchal-tr/alakajgiri District 500 101.

7. Keesari Shankar, Sio Late K. Vardaiah, aged about 55 Years, Occ. Business, Rl/o Laxmapur, [Vlud uchinthalapally Mandal, Medchal-Malakajgiri District 500 '101.

8. Keesari Srinu, S/o Late K. Ramulu, aged about 45 Years, Occ. Business, Fl/o Laxmapur, fvluduchinthala pally lvlandal, Ivledchal-tvlalakajgiri District 500 101. 9. Keesari Venkatesh, S/o Late K. Ramulu, aged about 35 Years, Occ. Mason, R/o Laxmapur, Muduchinthalapally Mandat, Medchal-tr/alakalgiri District 500 101. l0.Keesari Anjaneyulu, S/o Late K. Kistaiah, aged about 40 Years, Occ. Business, R o Laxmapur, Muduchinthalapally tvlandal, Medchal-Malakajgiri District 500 '10 1 . l l.Keesari Nagesh, Sio Late K. Ramulu, aged about 3l Years, Occ. Business, Rl/o Laxrnapur, lV ud uchintha la pally tvlandal, Medchzil N'lalakajgiri District 500 101 . l2.Keesari Bhaskar, S/o K. Pochaiah, aged about 30 Y:ars, Occ. Business, R/o Laxmapur, Muduchinthalapally Mandal, Medchal-Mal,r <algiri District 500 101. 13. Keesari Suman, S/o K. Pochaiah, aged about :2 I Years, Occ. Private Employee, R7o Laxmapur, I\,4ud uch intha lapally Manc a Med chal-il/alakajgiri District 500 '101 . l4.Keesari Vamshi, S/o K. Srinu, aged about 20 Years, ,, c,;. Private Service, Rl/o Laxmapur, li/ ud uch inthalapa lly illandal, [t 4edcha l-lvla l,; ra;g ii-i District 500 101.

15. Keesari Tarun, S/o Late K. Narsimulu, aged about ,20 Years, Occ. Private Service, R/o Laxmapur, Mud uch inthalapally [\4anri rl. tt4 edchal-tt/alakajg iri District 500 101. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ln lia praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, ttr, High Court may be pleased to issr-re an order or direction more particularly c r r: in the nature of Writ of l\,4andamus by declare the in-actions of the Official Re:; rondents in registering FIR / Crime btrsed on the written complaint of the Petitilner dated 21 .11.2021 and 22.11.20211 against the Respondent No.6 to 1{ is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, clear violation of principles of natural jr-r:.trce and also contrary to the Criminal Procedure Code and also contrary to the g rrrlelines of the Honble Supreme Court of lndia -c-o-nsequently direct thEResponde 'ri No.5 to regis-er FIR / Crime based on the written complaint of the Petitioner lated 21 .11.2021 and 22.11.2021 against the Respondent No. 6 to 'l 5 and pr'r cc.ed for investigation with followed by the further actions. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,.;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cc urt may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 to register FIR against the Rer pondent No.6 to 15 by dully considering the written complaints of the Petitioner J:rted 21 .11.2021 and 22.11.2021 and take up the investigation forthwith in pr nding disposal of the main Writ Petition. -v7 lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 'l 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the Respondent No.5 to provide Police Aid / Protection in protecting the property from the Respondent No.6 to '1 5 in pursuance of Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 147120211 dated 31 04.2012, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOLLU NAGARAJU (Nor pREsENr) Counsel for the Respondent No.l to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6 to 15: SRI G.RAVI CHANDRAN The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD I{tMAR WRIT PETITION No.347OO OF 2O2 I ORDER Nont: a1;pcars lor the petitioner.

2. Hearrl lcarncd Government Plcader for Hor rr ,rJrpr'arir-rg lor respon<lent Nos. 1 Lo 5 and peruscd the record.

3. Despite this Court ordcring notice t r unofficial rcspondcn,s, proof of service of notice is not. l-i c(1 till date. Howcvcr, hat ing regard [o the nature of lis invo vL cl irud Lhe manner ol'disposal of the Writ Petition, this Court s o[ tlrt: view that lhe m.lttcr can be disposed of rvithout having, lrc' audicnce of the said respondent.

4. The qrievance of the pctitioner as set out in tlrr: alfidavit filed in sul)porl of the Writ Pctition is that the .r'sponclcnts authorities b:rsing on the complaints made by thc , trt i()ncl- on 2LIl.2O2. rrnd '22.\l.2O2l arc not initiatir-r ir('lion by registerir-rg thc FIR against the unofficial respo- l,rnt herein, q,hich action ol'lhe respondents it is contended as; lrrghlv illegal and arbitrurry.

5. Wher-r the matter is taken up for hearns, learned GovernmenI I)leader appearing for official responrl ,nls submits that the rc sJrondcnts-authori ties on receiving l1'r contplaints I I 2 made by the petitioner, have made a GD entry and after causing preliminary enquiry, closecl the said complain t on 17.12.202I by noting the same as,,civil in nature,,; ancl that the petitioner was also informed of the action taken by sending communication through Registered post (Rp).

6. I have taken note of the respective submissions made. 7 . Having regard to the submission made as above and since, it is now stated before this Court that a communication through RP has already bcen sent to thc petitioner informing as to the action taken on his complaint of closing the same as .,civil in nature", this Court is of the vien, that the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ petition stands redressed. However, if the petitioner is aggrievecl by the said action taken by the respondents-authorities, it is open for the pctitioner to avail further remedies under Cr.p.C./BNSS. 8 Granting liberty as noted hereinabove, the present writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous shall stand closed. petitions, if any, pendirrg //TRUE COPYil SD/. B. REKHA RANI ANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER Home Depa rtment, S ecretariat, Hyderabad, State of To, 1 JlP^ l1ncipai ^S^e^clgtary, I erangana - 500063 2. The Commissioner of Hyderabad 500 032. Police, Cyberabad Commissionarate, Gachibowli, 3. The Deputv Commissioner of police, Balanaoar Zone, Cyberabad police, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500054 :t\atirta.. -_it1r-rr.-.ait .l*-*3.t1t The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pet-E asheerabad Division' Cyberabad, Secunderabad 500 067. The Station House Officer, Shameerpet Police Station, Cyberabad Co mmission arate, Shameerpet, t\rledchal District One CC to SRI BOLLU NAGARAJU, Advocate [OPUo One CC lo SRI G.RAVI CHANDRAN, Advocate [OPU(|] Two CCs to GP FOR HOtt/E, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD tlopies r$ 4 5 t) 7 8 o BSR GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1810612025 , ORDER WP.No.347O0 of 2021 -., /-..\'- ^/i \ i 'J-i: r \.- ri_..'; i]tT 2625 l -t' - ,* ',,. : / DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS