The High Court · 2025

public Prosecutor, High Court Hyderabad, TS /i /',' /

2. Tahmeena Jabeen,, D/o Mohammed Shareef Ali, Household, R/o H,No. 17-2-954-955, Rein Bazar aged about 32 years, Occ Chaman, Hyderabad, Ts, .Respondent NO.ZDefacto complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC No.6179/2022 pending on the file XV Additional Chief Mekopolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad, TS. Nro 1 OF Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all the proceedings in CC No. 617912022 pending on the file XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad, TS, pending disposal of the quash petition on the file of this Hon'ble Court. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Tahmeena Jabeen,, D/o Mohammed Shareef Ali, aged about 32 years, Occ Household, R/o H,No. 17-2-954-955, Rein Bazar Chaman, Hyderabad, Ts, ...Respondent No.2/Defacto complainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented ,by public Prosecutor, High Court Hyderabad through WPS, South Zone, at Hyderabad, TS. ...Respondent No.l/Complainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025

2. Mohd Shafi Ullah, S/o. Mohammed Taker Ullah, Husband aged about 37 years, Occ: Lab Technician, presently residing at lndiana, USA rep by its GPA Namely Rafath Unnisa Begum W/o. Mohammed Zaker Ullah, age.51 about years, Occ: Household, Rl/o H.No. 1 7-1-3191 Ngl 1311, Owasinagar Santhosh nagar, Hyderabad.

3. Rafath Unnisa Begum, Mother in law Wo. Mohammed Zaker Ullah, aged about 53 years, Occ household.

4. Mohammed Zaker Ullah,, Brothe in law S/o Mohammed Asad Ullah, aged about 62 years, Occ Pvt Service.

5. Mohd Toufeequllah, S/o Mohammed Zaker Ullah, aged about 33 years, Occ Pvl Service, presently residing at lndiana, USA, rep by its GPA Namely Rafath Unnisa Begum Wo. Mohammed Zaker Ullah aged about 53 years OcL Household R/o. HNo.17-1-319/A/9/3/1, Owasinagar Santhoshinagar Hyderabad

6. Mohd Zainullah,, S/o Mohammed Zaker Ullah, Brother in law aged about 28 years, Occ Pvt Service, presently residing at lndiana, USA rep by its GPA / /1 Namely Rafath Unnisa Begum Wo. Mohammed Zaker Ullah, aged about 53 years, Occ household, who is A2 herein.

7. lshrath Unnisa Begum, Wo. Syed Ghaffar, aged about 37 years, Occ household, R/o. H.No.18-13-1321N139, Ahmed Nagar, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

8. lffath Unnisa Begum, W/o. Mohd lrfan Ahmed, aged about 36 years, Occ household, R/o. H.No. 17-3-1 83/A, lmambada, Charminar, Hyderabad. Al to A5 are R/o.H.No.17-1-319lNgl3l1, Owaisi Nagar, Santosh Nagar, Hyderabad, TS, ...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 7 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the permission Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners and the respondent No. 2 to compromised the above case by compounding the offence in CC No. 617912022 pending on the file of XV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Hyderabad, TS. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit on compromise Petition and Joint memo the High Court may be pleased to compromise the proceedings in CC No. 617912022 pending on the file of XV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Hyderabad, TS, in view of the compromise entered between the Petitioners and the Respondent No.2 This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SOHAIL AHMED, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: GOMMON ORDER I l I THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.l1720 ot 2O25 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos'l to 7 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.6179 of 2022 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-4, 406 and 506 of lndian Penal Code, 1860 (for short'lPC') and Sections 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short'DP Act) r/w. Section 156 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short'Cr.P.C.')

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7 as well as respondent No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed seeking permission to compound the offences and to compromise the proceedings in the above CC.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions. 2 ETD. J i Crlp_l I 720_2025

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.3 ,n! 4 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dated 10.09.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 19.09.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.6179 of 2022 on the file of XV Additional Chief Mg[r@olitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, iegistered against the 3 ETD, J Crlp_l I 720_2025 I ! i petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7 paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:S81N0020070, MICR No.500004057)'and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, within a period of three (03) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

7. Miscellaneous apptications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/- A SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XV Additional chief Metropolitan magistrate at Hyderabad. 2. The Station House officer, wps, south Zone police station, Hyderabad 3- Two CCs to thePublic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to SRI SOHATL AHMED, Advocate tOpUCI 5. One CC to SRI SHAKEEL AHMED, Advocate tOpUC] 6. Two CD Copies (along with copy of Joint memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Sohail Ahmed, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon,ble Court vide order dated 06-10.2025 as Rs.5,0004 ( Rupees Five thousand only) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs.S,O0O/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof g.eJng|,me$-H,**Jt%JJg3a.s of zo/zs -.*.* . - "of \ o I u^*-.t HIGH COURT DATED:0611012025 I COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.11720 ol2025 _-'_:-'. :' t? \. '\ Jz, '( : +i 19 EEr 2U5 '.-r Crrf ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL pETtTtON AND t.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 o