The High Court · 2025

Judgment

3. 4. 5. 6.

7. B4- ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 to S in not taking any action against the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 for illegal construction by grabbing a land allotted to park situated in Sai Nagar Colony, Survey No.4415/1, Maqta Mahaboobpet Village, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District despite the Pr:titioner submitting representation dated 15t0912o25 as arbitrary' illegal and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under constitution of lndia apart frcm being in violation of the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 3o0A arrd consequentially direct the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to remove the construction rn,hich is constructed by Respondent No 6 and 7 ' bY putting the Petitioner on notice prior to considering any application in the interest of justice' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to take action forthwith against the'Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 ancl stop the construction activity undertaken by the Respondent Nos' 7 over and abrve the lands situated at Sai Nagar Colony in Survey No.441511, Maqta Mahaboobpet village, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' pending dispos;at of the main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice lA NO: 2 OF 2Ct25 Between shaik Kirrimulla, s/o. Abdul Mastan, aged..about 47 years, occ: Business' Sri fflNSg"t R/o. Ftat No.S0i, E6i i,6l?, SkM Li,t'r", H.omes fO;rrlments, &"dv'i'i"o1iff:::,::*x;:ffi :il:":::T:::;ff ::i'-., AND

1. Mukund Das soni, s/o late Purusotham Das Soni,. ag.e-d^!^6^ years, occ arrin"is R/o H N". q1-zgO Esamia BTzal Koti Hyderabad 500001 2. Smt Lalitha Soni,'fuo L"I"-Corind iatsoni, aged 53 years Occ Housewife R/o I r.rJTs-i-2O9 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012 23 vears, occ Student 3. ijrii'copar Soni,'5io l;iE-c:"rih9-lal Soni, ?g-e^q^1b^out nl6 H t[., 1 5-2-2os Maha rajs u nj Hvde rabad 5000 1' ... *=rro-BE+iTiJ,lHI

4. The state of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal secretary, Municipal . .. Administ atio n anO"U rOln Dbvelopment Dbpartment, Secretariat Bu ildings, Hyderabird. 5. ffi; dAtgr Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Off at CC Complex, Tank euna Road Hyberabad. Rep g-y tls Commissioner' 6. ineZonat Coinmissioner, GHMC, SerilingamP-qlly. i. iii. O"p,rtf Commissioner, Qlrcle No.21,-9H\4q, Serlingampally' g: fne Aiii'stint City Planner, Circle No.21, GHMC, Serlingampally. : i I i i r I * t i , t I It I I i I ,TI T I T I II I

9. Somireddy Gari Pratap Reddy, S/o Not Known Occ Business R/o Plot No. 84- 57, BK Enclave in Sy No.44l5l4 and 441512, at Maqta mehaboobpet village, Serlingampally, Miyapur, Hyderabad lO.Amerender Reddy, S/o not known , Occ Business R/o BK Enclave, Sy No. 441514 and 441512, Maqta mehaboobpet village, Serlingampally, Miyapur, Hyderabad. ... RESPON DENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed implead party petitioner as Respondent No.8 in lA.No. 1 12025 and in WP.No.2897 812025.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVIND Counset for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counset for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 5: SRI G.MADHUSUDAN REDDY, Counsel for the Proposed Respondent: Ms. S.V.RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 &7: ^ SC FOR GHMC W.P.NO: 27013 OF 2025 Between:

1. Mukund Das Soni, S/o late Purusotham Das Soni, aged 56 years, Occ. Business R/o H No. 4-7-290 Esamia Bazar Koti Hyderabad 500001

2. Smt Lalitha Soni, Wo Late Govind lal Soni, aged 53 years Occ Housewife R/o H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012

3. Brij Gopal Soni, S/o late Govind lal Soni, aged about 23 years, Occ Student R/o H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012 ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Adm inistration and U rban Development Department, Secretariat Bu ild ings, Hyderabad.

2. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Off at CC Complex, Tank Bund Road Hyderabad. Rep by its Commissioner. 3. The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Serilingampally. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No.21, GHMC, Serlingampally. 5. The Assistant City Planner, Circle No.21, GHMC, Serlingampally. 6. The Station House Officer (Deleted), Miyapur Police Station, Miyapur. (CT of R6 is deleted from the away of party respondents as per c.o.dt.08.0912025.)

7. Somireddy Gari Pratap Reddy, S/o Sommireddy Gari Venkat Reddv, Occ. Business R/o Plot No. 84-57, BK Enclave in Sy No. 44l\l4 and 441512, at Maqtarrehaboobpet village, Serlingampally, Miyapur, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petitiorr under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancer; stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of a Writ of Marrdamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in not taking any action against the Respondent Nos. 7 for illegal construction situated at Plot No 84-57 in Survey No. 441511 , Maqta Mahaboobpet Village, Serlingampalll, Mandal, Ranga Reddy District despite the petitioner submitting representation dated 01-09-2025 and other consequential representations dated 03-09-2025 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of lndia apart from being in violation of the fundamental guarantees contalned in Article 300,4 and consequentially direct the Respondent Nos.4 to 5 to remove the construction which is constructed by Respondent Nc 7, by putting the Petitioner on notice prior to considering any application in the interest of justice. IA 78 Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filerd in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respr:ndent Nos. 3 to 6 to take action forthwith against the Respondent Nos. 7 and stop the construction activity undertaken by the Respondent Nos. 7 over and abova the lands situated at Plot No 84-57 in Survey No. 44t\l1, MaqtaMahaboolrpet Village, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending dispose,l of the main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVTND Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO S: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REODY, Counsel for the Respondent No.7: - SC FOR GHMC W.P.NO: 27292 OF 2025 Between:

1. Mukund Das Soni, S/o Iate Purusotham Das Soni, aged 56 years, Occ. Business R/o H No. 4-7-290 Esamia Bazar Koti Hyderabad 500001

2. Smt Lalitha Soni, Wo Late Govind lal Soni, aged 53 years Occ Housewife R/o 3. Brij Gopal Soni, S/o late Govind lal Soni, age{ _ab_out 23 years, Occ Student H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012 R/o H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012 ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Adm in istration a nd U rban Development Department, Secretariat Bu ild ings, Hyderabad.

2. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Off at CC Complex, Tank Bund Road Hyderabad. Rep by its Commissioner. 3. The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Serilingampally. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No.21, GHMC, Serlingampally. 5. The Assistant City Planner , Circle No.21, GHIIC, Serlingampqlly. 6. Somireddy Gari Pratap Reddy, S/o Not Known Occ. Business R/o Plot No. 84-57, BK Enclave in Sy No.44l5l4 and 441512, at Maqtamehaboobpet village, Serlingampally, Miyapur, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in not taking any action against the Respondent Nos. 6 for illegal construction situated in Sai Nagar Colony, Survey No. 441511, Maqta Mahaboobpet Village, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District despite the Petitioner submitting representation dated 2910812025 and subsequently on 08.09.2025 for encroachment of open place of HUDA Layout which is allotted for Park vide No.107561MP2IHUDA/1991 by the respondent No.6 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of lndia apart from being in violation of the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 3004 and consequentially direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to seize/remove/demolish the construction which is constructed by Respondent No 6, by putting the Petitioner on notice prior to considering any application in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filerd in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Resp,:n6sn1 Nos. 3 to 5 to take action forthwith against the Respondent Nos.6 and stop the construction activity undertaken by the Respondent Nos.6 over and abovo the lands situated at Sai Nagar Colony in Survey No. 4415/1 , MaqtaMahaboocpet Village, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposerl of the main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVIND Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 5: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - SC FOR GHMC Between: 1 . Mukund [)as Soni, S/o late Purusotham Das Soni, aged 56 years, Occ. 2. Smt Lalitha Soni, Wo Late Govind lal Soni, aged 53 years Occ Housewife R/o Business tVo H No. 4-7-290 Esamia Bazar Koti Hyderabad 500001 H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012

3. Brij Gopal Soni, S/o late Govind lal Soni, aged about 23 years, Occ Student R/o H No '5-2-209 Maharalgunj Hyderabad 500012 D ...PETITIONERS

1. The State ()f Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administra:ion and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Greaterr Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Off at CC Complex, Tank Bund Road Hyderabad, Rep by its Commissioner. 3. The Zonal rlommissioner, GHMC, Serilingampally. 4. The Deputlt Commissioner, Circle No.21, GHMC, Serlingampally. 5. The Assistant City Planner, Circle No.2 t, GHMC, Serlingampally. 6. Somireddy Gari Pratap Reddy, S/o Not Known Occ. Business R/o Plot No. 84-57, BK llnclave in Sy No. 441514 and 441512, at Maqtamehaboobpet village, Serlingampally, Miyapur, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances st;rted in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue ern appropriate writ, order or direction, preferabry in the nature of a writ of Mandanrus decraring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in not taking any action against the Respondent Nos. 6 for illegal construction situated in Sai Nagar Colony, Survey No. 441511, MaqtaMahaboobpet Village, Sertingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District despite the Petitioner submitting representation dated 29-08-2025 and subsequently on 08.09.2025 for encroachment of open place of HUDA Layout which is allotted for Park vide No.10756lMP2lHUDtu1991 by the respondent No.6 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of lndia apart from being in violation of the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 300A and consequentially direct the Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 to seize/remove/demolish the construction which is constructed by Respondent No 6, by putting the Petitioner on notice prior to considering any application in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to take action forthwith against the Respondent Nos. 6 and stop the construction activity undertaken by the Respondent Nos. 6 over and above the lands situated at Sai Nagar Colony in Survey No.441511, MaqtaMahaboobpet Village, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVIND Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 5: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, sc FoR GHMG counsel for the Respondent No.6: - W.P.NO: 30977 OF 2025 Between:

1. Mukund Das Soni, S/o late Purusotham Das Soni, aged 56 years, Occ- Business R/o H No. 4-7-290 Esamia Bazar Koti Hyderabad-500001

2. Smt Lalitha Soni, Wo Late Govind lal Soni, aged 53 years Occ Housewife R/o H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012

3. Brij Gopal Soni, S/o late Govind lal Soni, aged about 23 years, Occ Student R/o H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012 ...PETITIONERS AND

2. 3 4 5 6

7. RESPONDENTS Petition rnder Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased toto iss,ue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 in not taking any action to stop the illegal and interference by the Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 is not taking any action against Respondent No.7 and g by criminal trespassing as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and contrary consequentially direct the Respondent Nor;. 3 to 6 to take the action against activity of the Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 and further direct the Respondent Nos. 6 to take appropriate action against the Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 for criminal trespassing, in the interest of justice. IA NO: 202t; Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Resporrdents 3 to 6 to take required steps forthwith to ensure that no further encroachnrent and illegal interference we is made by the Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 pending clisposal of the main writ petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVIND Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN & U Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 5: SRI G.MADHUSU SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: - RBAN DEV O: Between:

1. The State of Administration and H na, ENI' ...PETITIONERS , Munici ldings, 2 3 4 5 6 7 RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in not taking any action to stop/ seize the illegal and interference by the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 is not taking any action against Respondent No.6and7 by Criminal trespassing as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and contrary consequentially direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to take the action against activity of the Respondent Nos. 6and7 and further direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to take appropriate action against the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 for criminal trespassing, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 to take required steps forthwith to ensure that no further encroaohment and illegal interference we is made by the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in,the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVIND Counsel for th,3 Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for thr: Respondent Nos.2 TO 5: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.6 & 7: - SC FOR GHMC W.P 1 7 F 202s Between: 1 . Mukund Das Soni, S/o late Purusotham Das Soni, aged 56 years, Occ- 2. Smt Lalitha Soni, Wo Late Govind lal Soni, aged 53 years Occ Housewife R/o Business R/o H No. 4-7-290 Esamia Bazar Koti Hyderabad 500001

3. Brij Gopal Soni, S/o late Govind lal Soni, aged about 23 years, Occ Student H No 15-ll-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012 R/o H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012 ...'ETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its P nd Urban Developme Administration a HyderabaC rincipal nt Department, , Mun icipal riat Buildings,

2. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Off at CC Complex, Tank Bund Road Hyderabad. Rep by its Commissioner. 3. The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Serilingampally 4. The Depuy Commissioner, Circle No.2'1, GHMC, Serlingampally. 5. The Assistant City Planner, Circle No.21, GHMC, Serlingampally. 6. Prasanth tleddy, S/o not known, Aged about 45yrs, Occ- Business, Rl/o Sy.No.441514 and 441512, Sai Nagar Colony, Maqta Mahaboobpet, Miyapur. HYderabad' ...RESP.NDENTS Petition urrder Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 in not taking any action against the Respondent Nos.6 for undertaking construction activity and digging the land by covering the Petitioners property situated at Sy.No.44B/4 ancl l+/s/2, Sai Nagar Colony, Maqta Mahaboobpet, Miyapur, Serlingampally Mandal. RR Dist., despite the Petitioner submitting representation dated 29.11.202ti s arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of lndia apart from being in violation of the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 3004 and consequentially direct the * :1, ,/ ;. .*r Y Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to take action against the Respondent Nos. 6 and conduct enquiry on the illegal claim of the Respondent Nos. 6 in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 to take required steps forthwith to ensure that no further encroachment and illegal interference we is made by the Respondent No. 6 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. COUNSCI fOr thE PEtitiONETS: SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVIND Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 5: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, counsel for the Respondent No.6: -- sc FoR GHMC W.P.NO: 37117 OF 2025 Between: euiiness R/o H trto. +-Z-Zg0 Esamia Bazar Koti Hyderabad-500001

1. Mukund Das Soni, S/o late Purusotham Das.Soni,. ag.e-d^^5^6^ years, Occ 2. Sml f-aiitf.,a Soni, 1l1/7o Late Govind lal Soni, aged 53 years Occ Housewife R/o 3. ijrii oopat Soni, Slo lat5 cbvihd lal Soni, aged _ab_out 23 years, occ Student ...'ET'T.ONERS H No 15-2-2Og Maharajgunj Hyderabad 500012 nl6 H No 15-2-209 Maharajgunj Hyderabad 5000'12 AND

1. The state of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal secretary, Municipal Ad ministration jnd"U rban Dbveibpment Dbpartment, Secretariat Bu ild ings, Hyderabad. Z. T6e Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Off at CC Complex, Tank Bund Road Hv-derabad. Rep by its Commissioner. 3. The Zonal Coinmissioner, GHMC, SerilingamP-qlly. 4. The Deputy commissioner, circle No.2'!, 9.t11\,!9, Serlingampally. 5. The Assistint City Planner, Circle No.21, GHMQ_,_Serlingampally. 6. nmJrenOer neOAV, S/o not'known, Aged a,Qo!r! S0yrsr O-cc Bu.siness, R/o Plot f.io.SO, ST and i2' ,'Sy.No.44lilq dnd-q4lll2,Maqta Mahaboobpet, Miyapur, HYderabad -.RESP.NDENTS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of a Writ of Man,lamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 in not taking any aclion against the Respondent Nos.6 for undertaking construction activity and diglging the land by covering the Petitioner's property situated at Plot No.50, 51 and 52, Sy.No.44l5/4 and 441512, Maqta Mahaboobpet, Miyapur, Serlingampally Mandal. RR Dist., despite the Petitioner submitting representation dated 29.11.2025 s arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of lndia apart from being in violation of the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 3004 and consequentially direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to take action against the Respondent Nos. 6 and conduct enquinT on the illegal claim of the Respondent Nos. 6 in the interest of justice. 1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 to take required steps forthwith to ensure that no further encroactrment and illegal interference we is made by the Respondent No. 6 pending dispo:;al of the main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVIND Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 5: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER SC FOR GHMC IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY PETITI 37107 alJ.d,377l7 0 2025 DATE OF ORDER: 10.12.2025 Between: Mukund Das Soni and others AND The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Adrninistration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. Petitioners Respondents CO ORDER : (ORAL) Since the issue involved in these writ petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. G.Madhusudan Reddy, learncd Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC); and perused the material on record'

3. Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, basing on the written instructions, submitted that as many as twenty (20) complaints have been t 2 received from Mr. Mukund Das Soni No.l in all the writ petitions) alleging unauthorized are being made in the land in liurvey Nos.44l5/l and Maqta Mahaboobpet Village, Serilinganrpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy without obtaining requisite building permissions. [n the complaints, was claimed that Mr. Mukund Das Soni i:; the absolute owner and of the land in the above survey numbers and certain individuals, who grabbed his land, have made constructio n using fraudulent docurnents. is submitted that on receipt of such complaints, the staff of the GHMC all the constructions and it was obr;erved that the complaints to different categories of properties including ongoing completed and occupied buildings, r:ommercial shops and sheds. [t was noticed that few of the locations mentioned in the do not fall within the above surv3y numbers as referred to by complainant. That for the purpose of verilying whether the are authorized, notices have been issued to all the concerned under Section 635 of the Greater Hy,Jerabad Municipal C Act, 1955 (for short 'GHMC Act'). Most. of the owners/occupiers have to the said notices and have submitted written replies stating the complainant is repeatedly filing false rmd fiaudulent complaints with intention to harass, blackmail and extort rronev. Some of the owners of buildings, which had already 3 been constructed, stated that they are in occupation of the buildings since many years and there is no ongoing construction activity in their properties.

4. W.P. No.28978 of 2025: Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC submitted that the respondents No.6 and 7 herein are no way concerned with the land in the above survey numbers. One Mr. Dakshina Murthy is the actual owner of the land. Upon confirmation that the construction is being carried out in the land without any valid permission, show cause notice was issued. Thereafter speaking order was passed and later, sealing notice under Section 461,-A of the GHMC Act.

5. W.P. No.27013 of 2025: Learned Standing Counsel submitted that notice was issued to respondent No.6 herein calling upon him to submit relevant documents in respect of the subject land; he submitted reply stating that there is no ongoing construction at the site and he purchased the land on 18.06.1997 after the building was constructed and he is in physical possession and enjoyment of the land. That the vendor of respondent No.6 herein obtained building permission vide bullding permit No.l241 IMPZIHIIDA/95 dated

23.09.1996 and Group Housing permission vide file No.G/146/LPl148196 dated 01.03.1996 and the same were submitted along with the reply. Upon )l k 4 verification of the same, it was observed that the layout copy submitted by respondr:nt No.6 herein was only a draft layout and not an approved layout and that certain modifications were made to the existing construction, as such, show cause notice was issued to him for the said deviations. Subsequentll,, the complainant (Mr. Mukund Das Soni) submitted a letter withdrawing his complaint lodged against respondent No.6.

6. I4I.P. Nos.27292 and.Tl453of 2O25:. It is submitted that there is no ongoing construction activity in the open space rcserved for park purposes situated at Sai Nagar Colony, Maqta Mahaboobpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The layout is a Gram Panchayat layout and not a HUDA (Hyderabad Urban Developrnent Authority) layout. Therefore, the allegation of encroachment upon the open space of a HUDA layout is false, incorrect, and misleading. It is further submitted that the reliefs sough in both the writ petitions are identical in nature.

7. W.P. No.30977 of 2025: Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC submitted that notice has been issusd to the owner/occupier ofthe subject premises, calling upon him to submit all relevant documents along with a copy of the building permission, if any. In response thereto, the owner/occupier submitted 5 certain documents; however, no valid building permission was produced. The owner/occupier stated that there was no ongoing construction at the site and that the construction had already been completed and the building was fully occupied. Thereafter, the GHMC issued a show cause notice to the owner/occupier as there was no building permission. That speaking order will be passed in accordance with law.

8. W.P. No.32764 of 2025: lt is submitted that the GHMC issued notice to the owner/occupier of the subject land calling upon him to submit relevant documents along with copy of the building permission. The owner submitted documents, however, no valid permission was produced. Thereafter, the GHMC stopped the construction activity at the site on multiple occasions. However, the owner continued construction in violation of the directions issued by the GHMC, as such, shorv cause notice was issued calling upon him to submit explanation within a period of fifteen (15) days as to why the unauthorized construction should not be removed. Despite the same, the owner continued with unauthorized construction, and therefore the GHMC was constrained to seal the building. ! && 6

9. W.P. N O7 of 2O25: Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the GHMC inspected the site and noticed that one Mr. Prashant Reddy was carrying out unauthorized construction of basement at the site; the work was stopped immediately. Subsequently, show cause notice was issued calling upon the owner/ occupier to show sufficient cause as to why the unauthorized construction should not be demolished and there was direction to stop the construction forthwith.

10. W.P., No.37L17 of 2025: lt is submitted that the GHMC will conduct inspection of the site if any unauthLorized construction is noticed. If it is found that any unauthorized construction is going on, the GHMC will stop such work immediatell'. I l. [t is seen from the written instructions in this batch of cases that following ac:tion has been taken by the GHMC: sl. No. I Type of property C)n going corLstructions

2. Conrpleted and occupied buildings No. of properties 5 *5'- Remarks Issued show-cause notice to I properties, speaking order to 2 propefi, and sealed 2 properties. Issued Call for Document notice to 3 properties, show cause notice to I property and speaking order to I ProPertY /' \ 7 3 Commercial shops & Sheds t0 Most of these are long-standing sheds. Call for Document notice issued to all properties and speaking order notice issued to I propertY

12. Learned, Standing Counsel submitted that the petitioners have approached this Court for extraneous reasons. Having lodged complaint against respondent No.6 in W.P. No.27013 of 2025, the petitioners have withdrawn the same, which shows the intentions of the petitioners are not genuine. The GHMC has been dealing with the said complaints with utmost sincerity, impartiality and diligence. As and when it was noticed by the GHMC that ongoing construction was being made without valid permission, the same has been stopped.

13. In the light of the submissions made by the learned Standlng Counsel for GHMC and written instructions taken on record, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent authorities to take action pursuant to the show cause notices/speaking orders and ensure that no unauthorized construction is made by the unofficial respondents in these writ petitions. It is needless to state that action, if any, taken by the respondent authorities, in respect of the unauthorized constructions, shall be in accordance with law by giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and other concerned/ interested persons. There shall be no order as to costs. 8 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petit.ion. stand closed. //TRUE COPY/ SD/. K. MADHAVI REGISTRAR OFFICER To 1 2

3. 4 5 6 7. 8 I 10.Two CD CoPies PSK.& j HIGH COURT DATED:1011212025 a toi\ lliE s fJ rJ a- [ 5 il]\R 2t}2[ * C .f COMMON ORDER WP. N o. 2 8 97 8, 27 0 1 3, 27 292, 27 453, 30977, 327 G4, 37107 AND 37177 ot2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS