1. Basetti Ajay S/o Basetti Ramaswamy v. The State of Telangana

circumstances stat;d in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondents in not considering the application No.250001 1741 in respect of land bearing Survey No. 2751A111 an extent of Ac. 1..1800 Gts situated in Ameenpur Village & Mandal, Sangareddy District vide Katha No.1 163 and application No.250001 1743 in respect of land bearing Survey No.352/4 extent of 0.3400 Gts situated in Ameenpur Village and [\i1andal, Sangareddy District vide katha No.1163 for grievance related to removal from prohibited properties is illeg al, arbitrary and) u nconstitutiona I anc consequently direct the respondents to remove from prchibited properties by considering application No.250001 1741 in respect of land bearing Survey No. )-751A111 an extent of Ac. 1.1800 Gts situaled in Ameenpur Village and Mandal, Sangareddy District vide Katha No.1163 and application No.25000'1 1743 in respect of land bearing Survey No.352/4 an -.xtent of 0-3400 Gts situated in Amer:npur Village and, Mandal, Sangareddy Di:;trict vide katha No.1 163. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under llection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s,upport of the petition, the High Court ma) be pleased to direct the respondent; to remove schedule properties from prohioited properties by considering appliczrtion No.2500011741 in respect of land bea'ing Survey No. 2751A111 an extent of Ac. '1 .1800 Gts situated in Ameenpur Villalye and Mandal, Sangareddy District ride Katha No.1 163 and application No.:150001 1743 in respect of land bearirtg Survey No.352/A an extent of 0.3400 t3ts situated in Ameenpur Village and lr4andal, Sangareddy District vide katha No.1 163 pending disposal of the writ pet tion forthwith. Counsel for the Petrtic n -.rs: SRI NAYAKAWADI RAMESH Counsel for the Respcn,lents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.2684O of 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri Nayakwadi Ramesh, Iearned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L. Ravinder, learncd Assistant (lovernment Pleader for Revenue. Perused thc recorrl.

2. Petitioners herein are claiming that late Nail<oti Sathaiah (at Basetti Sathaiah is the absoh-rte osner of thc suit schedule property tn Sy.No.275/Ai/1 an extnt of ac. 1.1B gutnas, and also having passbool< r,irle Kathar No.1163 and also the land in Sy.No.352/A to an extent of Ac.0.34 guntas situated in Ameenpur Village ancl Mar-rdal, Sangareddy District and also having passbook vide [(atha No. 1163 and his name was entered in the revcnue records also. He died on 18.O5.2O 16. The petitioners are the grand-sons and legal heirs of late Naikoti Satl-rzriaLh (rr Basetti Sathaiah. After death of their gr:lnd father, O.S No.72 of 2017 and O.S No.131 of 20 15 u,ere liled bv some of their family members on the file of the learrncd Familv CourLcum- IV Additional District and Sessions .Iudge at I 2 j Sangaredcly In view of same, the revenue arrthorities added the said properties in the prohibited list Subsequent ]' O.S No.131 of 2015 was dtsm ssed for delault orr )u. 12.2021. Therefore, the petitiont:rs along rvith their far nril_v members liled a compromise petLtion vide I.A No.3l6 ol 2023 irr O.S.No.72 of 2OI7 prayirrg to dismiss the suit irr respect ol the schedule property as tLLe suit is com prom ise,l 1n terms of scttlement agreed lretrveen the parties. Hcr <:,,:, the sLlit is dismissed as compromir;ed.

3. Thcrca ltr:r, the petitioners approachr:d the rcsponden t authorities and filed an application Nos.25000 I 741 and 25000 I1743, dated 1O.O7 2025 in respcct ol. Ia .rrl in S,y.No.275 I A1 /1 to an extenl- ol Ac. 1.18 guntas anrl lhr: land in Sy.No.352/A to an extent o1'Ac.0.34 guntas rcsper:tivelv, situated in Ameenpur .,,illage and Mandal, Sarrgareddy District, along with all necessary documents. lbr removai of lands from prohibitec[ pr-operties through Lllr r-r Bharati portal. But the respondent authorities ciicl not act upon the same. Aggrir:vecl bv thc 3 said inaction of respondents, petitioners filed the present r.r,rit petition.

4. Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleacler for Revenue, instructions, u,ould submit that respondents will consider the applications in accordance u,ith leru,.

5. In the light of the said submissions, this Writ Pctitior.r is disposed of directing respondents to consider the online applications dated 1O.07.2025 submitted by thc petitioncrs b.v car,rsing necessary notices to the petitioner and :ill otlrer intercsted parties and by granting sufficient opportr-rnitv of hearing, pass appropriate orders in accordance u'ith lau, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period ol eight (08) u,eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order Miscelianeous applications, if any pencling, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD ALLIKARJUNA RAO STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I To

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Departmen Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. The District Collector, Sangareddy District. (s' ECTION OFFICER State of Telangana, 7 The Revenue Dlvisional Officer, Sangareddy Division, Sang areddy District. The Thasildhar, Ameenpur Mandal, Sangareddy District. One CC to SRI NAYAKAWADI RAMESH, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. o.

7. Two CD Copies MP LS J HIGH COURT DATE:D i1411012025 \JA 4 0[I 2 2tt|5 ((r C) ' 'r-':,:.i c! l. .. r. r: \.'* ORDER WP.No.26840 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOI.IT COSTS o ? \.1 rr\:I-