✦ Telangana High Court

Kotturi Kishan v. Chetan Gulmadkar

VLL ADDITIONAL DISTRICT, SESSRON, ADDL, DISTRICT, SESSION, VLL C CRIT ONAL DISTRICT2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Recordinlr t r,: ; rid submission of the learned counsel ii,;- rhe peiir_i'nei.. the civil Revision Pc Lri.n is dismissed as infructuors. No or-d,:r. :rs to cos1.s. Miscellanco .r ; , .titions pending, if any, sha stand r;lost:< . AS i ! , ,i…

Judgment

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 05-12-2019 passed in l.A.No.46 of 2019 in O.S.No.15 of 20'14 on the file of the Court of the Vll Additional District and Sessron Judge, at Nirmal. Between: Kotturi Kishan, S/o. Laxman, Age: 71 years, Occ: Rtd employee, R/o Nizamabad. ..Petitioner AND Chetan Gulmadkar, S/o. A. V. Gulmadkar, Age: 34 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Gollamada Village, Kuntala Mandal, Adilabad District. ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section -t 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in o_s. No. 1512014 on the file of vll Addl. District and Session Judge, Nirmal, pending disposal of the above CRP- lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file additional material papers annexed to the present Civil Revision Petition as otherwise the petitioner will be put to heavy and irreparable loss, in the interest of Justice, Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Chekuri Yadagiri Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared I i The Court made the following: ORDER THE HOI{OIJRABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CIVIL ]IEVISION PETITION No.3l t7 of 2019 ORDER This cir'il lle'r,ion petition is filed by the petitic, rler. irsf, rieved by the order dated 05,12 :()';' in I.A No.46 of 2019 ino.S No r-5 .1 2r)r4 passed by the lealned Vll ,\c crit onal District and Sessions Judge, Ninna .

2.

l,earned c.rurs r ibr the petitioner reported that rhc (] t ], o.1-i ol' ic 1.1 itself was disposec ,,1 r,1 thc trial Courl a,d the sole petiti.ne;.e rp rcd.

3.

Recordinlr t r,: ; rid submission of the learned counsel ii,;- rhe peiir_i'nei.. the civil Revision Pc Lri.n is dismissed as infructuors. No or-d,:r. :rs to cos1.s. Miscellanco .r ; , .titions pending, if any, sha stand r;lost:< . AS i ! , ,i 1. The Vll Additio rrl District and Session .tuOge, at\\ 2. One CC t,t Stri ( : rekuri Yadagiri, Advocate tOpUCl 3. Two CD Oopie rs //TRUE COPYII Sd/. t\4OHD. ISMAIL ISTA N1' REGISTRAR q \ SEI]TIoN oFFICER To kam/DL +- HIGH COUFI-' DATED:0610:''12025 --a= y'^ii,., j( T 15 d Zi t,r,Y Z[Zs z a t 10 \-: \. - ;!,/ ' 'r\i .:i . ' ORDER CRP.No.3117 ot 2019 i I , I I I ! THE CIVIL R:T VISION PETITION lS DISMISSE:1) AS INFRUCTUOUS

6.rPR"6 <iffi

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments