High Court · 2025

2. Alla Shiva Prasad, S/o. Venumadh"r" trio, Aged. 14 Years, Occ. Student, R/o. H.No.1-&7, Gunturpally Village, Sar4iDm Village and Mandal, Warangal District. Both are miriors rep. by their maternal grandfather Gummadi Srinivasa. Rao, S/o. Hanumdiah, Aged. 58 Years.966. fficulture, R/o. H.No.141, Srinagar Colony, Parvathagiri Mandal, Warangal Dishict. i ;i AND

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat,.,l.lyderabad. i l The Districtpgllector, Warangal District. ', ...PETITIONERS The Revenrli,Divisional Officer cum Land Acquisition officer, Warangal.

3. 4. The Tahsildf5 Khila Warangal, Warangalflistrict. 5. Gadde @ Glde Subbamma, Wo. Srinivab;Rao, Aged aboul .72 years, Occ. Housewile, BUo. H.No.19-10-263, Shambunipet Village, Khammam Road, Warangal District. I

6. Gopalapti Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Chowdaraiah, Aged about . 69 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/ o. Gadepally Village, Sangem Mandal, Warangal District.

7. Alla Aruna, Wo. Late Ram.anjaneyulu, Aged about. 63 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H.No.19-10-263, Shambunipet Village, Khammam Road, Warangal District. i ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constihnion of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or more in the nature of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order declaring the action of Respondent No. 2 to 4 in not holding the compensation amount in rcspect ..of land admeasuring Ac.0.31 gts in Sy.No.224lC, situated at Gadepalle Village, Khila Warangal Mandal, Warangal District which is acquired for Mamnoor Airport in Proc. No.B/ 1590124 dated 17-03- 2025 in S1.No.37 showing Respondent No.5 as owner without considering the petitioner representation dt.02.09.2025 isi,illegal, arbitrary against to the principles of natural justice and consequently dired the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to hold the compensation amount of land Ac.0.31 gk-in Sy.No.224lC, situated at Gadepalle Village, Khila Warangal Mandal, Warangal District which is ar;quired for Mamnoor Airport in Proc. No.B/ 1590124 dated 17&3-2025 in Sl.No.37 showing Respondent No.5 as-owner by considering the Oetitiffirs representation dt.02.0g.2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 ii i;l [,a Petition under Section 151 CPCgoraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Oetiti$fl;the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to hold the compensation amount in respect of land Ac.0.31 gts in Sy.No.224lC, situated at Gadepalle Vitlage, Khila Warangal Mandal, Warangal District which is acquired for Mamnoor Airport in Proc. No.Bl 15g}l24 dated 17-03-2025 in Sl.No.37 on the name of Respondent No.5 by considering the petitioners representation dt.02. 09.2025: i. : Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt PADALA-PRAVIN KUMAR Counset for the Respondents No.l to 4fSRt i SOMU SRINIVAS REDDY, AGP FOR REVENUE # '.iil|!' counsel for the Respondent No.S: sRl .frLLl KAMBAIAH, SENIOR COUNSEL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: - iI The Court made the following: ORDER ri' ,:, Ivr THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAIT KUMAR WRIT PETITION 0.26898 of 2O2S ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and sri somu Srinivas Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for respondent Nos. I to 4 and sri Jatli Kambaiah, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.5. with their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ ,petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:- o...to issue a writ or more in the nature of a wit of Mandamus or anA other appropiate writ order declaring the action of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not holding tlte compensation amount in respect of tand admeasuing Ac.O.31 gts in Sg.No.224/C, situated at Gadepalle Village, Khila Warangal Mandal, Warangal Di"strict which is acquired,for Mamnoor Airport in Proc. No.B/ 1590/ 24 dated 17-03-2025'in 51.No.37 stawing Respondent /Vo.5 as owner without consideing the petitioner representation dt.O2.O9.2O25, is illegal, arbitrary against to the principles of nafirat justice and conseEtently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to hold the compensation amount of land Ac.O.31 gts in Sg.No.224/C, situated at Gadepalle Village, Khila Warangal Mandal, Warangal District which is acquired for Mamnoor Airport in Proc. No.B/ 15gO/24 d.ated. 17-03-2025 in Sl.No.37 slauing Respondent lVo.S as owner bg considering the petitioners representation dt.O2.O9.2O25 and to pass... "

3. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that the petitioners are minors and they are represented by their maternal grandfather. Petitioners are joint owners of land admeasuring Ac.O.32 guntas in Survey No.224lC, situated at \'- -I- {rY^..i 2 Gadepalle Village, Khila Fort Warangal Mandal, Warangal District, which is an ancestral property. The petitioners mother by name Ms.Alla Rajini got married to Mr.Verru Madhav on - 2L.O2.2017. It is further submitted that petitioners father and respondent No.S, conspired and killed petitioners mother on 29,12.2OI4. A case was registered against tltem uide SC. No.O5 of 2OO7, accordingly petitioners father was convicted for life imprisonment on 23.LO.2017. Thereafter, clisputes arose between pelitioners and respondent No.5 on the subject property. It is further submitted that respondent. No.5 acquired the subject land for Mamnoor Airport uide Proceedings No.B/1590/24 dated L7.O3.2O25. It is further submitted that if the acquisition amount is disbursed or transferred the petitioners will be put to irreparable loss and injury which cannot be compensated in any terms. Therefore, petitioners made a representation to respondent Nos.2 to 4 on O2.O9.2O25 to not to disburse or release the land acquisition amounts to respondent No.5. Further no orders were passed on the pending representation submitted by petitioners 1n holding the compensation amount of respondent No.5. Questioning the same present writ petition is filed.

4. l,earned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Aquisition placed on record instructions issued by Revenue Divisional Offrcer, Warangal, wherein it is stated that for the purpose of c \ t\ acquisition for development of Mamnoor Airport, the lands in 3 Nakkallapally and Gadepally Villages to an extent of Ac.22O.255 guntas is being acquired and accordingly notification was issued on 01.L2.2O24 and four modes of publication as required under the and any persons interested in the notified lands is supposed to file objections under Section 15(U of the RFCT LARR Act. Thereafter, no objections were filed by the petitioners or by their maternal grand father. According to the procedure notices under Section 2L{11 and 21(a) of the act award enquiry notices issued to prove the title in respect of notilied lands. On 16.04.2025 served notice'and petitioners failed to submit the documents in proof of,'their title. At this juncture, respondent No.5 filed documerlts in support of her claim i.e., Pattad.ar Passbook No.T21090090781, Khata No.60145 to an extent of Ac.0.32 guntas in Sy. No.224/C and consent in Form, E-l and G-1. At the time, of finalising the Form-F, a notice from Honble High Court before admission was received. Subsequently, further process was held up and the issue was kept in abeyance and it will be referred to the LARR Authority, Hyderabad under Section 77(21of the act along with compensation amount.

5. karned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No.S submits that respondent No.7 is her sister and that respondent No.5 never promised to the petitioners that she will handover the subject.[and to the petitioners. However, the land of respondent I / I t i : I i I I' :i i' { 'j i: It b No.S is acquired by the Mamnoor Airport l\uthorities uide Proc.No.B / L59O /2024 dated 17 .O3.2O25 and that during the award enquiry no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners and that petitioners name is included in the serial No.37 and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders.

6. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the title deeds, if any, furnished by the petitioners as well as those: submitted by respondent No.5 and shall afford both parties a fair opportunity of personal hearing and complete the exercise and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance to law within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the petitioners and respondent No.5 may be at liberty to pursue their remedies as are available under law

7. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. /,TRUECOPY// M.JAWAHAR REDDY TANT REGISTRAR \ SECTION OFFICER To 1 2 3 The Revenue Divisionat Officer cum.l_and Acq one CC to SRt PADALA PRAV!N..I(U MAR, Advocate Two ccs to GP for Revenue, i{igh court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI JALLT KAMBA|AH, Senior Counsel [OPUC] officer, Warangal loPUCl t: 4 5. Two CD Copies U. f,{rf lv: $!fl li, 1 ." + HIGH COURT DATED 12011112025 I T s .LrL + /+$lH >l- 'Yq ORDER WP.No.26898 of 20Zs DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS v 1V