The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates in interfering and demolishing the compound wall of the petitioner in respect'of his Plot No. 461 , Block A, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated at, Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagualapally Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 and his sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his plot l.l r- 461, admeasuring 500 square yards, Block A, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated rt Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagulapally Village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sang:rr :ddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m;r ' be pleased to direct the respondent No. 5 and his sub-ordinates not to interfere v ith the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 46'1 , admeasuring 5()l square yards, Block A, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated at Gowthami Nagar, Edrr anagulapally Village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, without fo I rwing due process of law and without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ESLAVATH RAJU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3,4 and 5: SMT. S. SRll fANTHl, AGP FOR R: /ENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MUNICIPAL All VIINISTRATION URBAN DEVELOPMEN'I Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA tl :DDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALIN/ The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.34549 of 2O2L THE 17TII DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: Smt. Shivani Madiraju. AND ...Petitioner The State of Telalgana, Rep. by the Special Chief Secretary to Government , Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & (5) others. ORDER: ...Respondents Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Stalding Counsel for Municipalities, appearing for the respondents. Perused the material on record

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petitior-r seeking to declare the action of respondent No.5 and their sub ordinates in interfering with and demolishing the compound wall of the petitioner 1n respect of petitioner's Plot No.56 1, Block A, in Sy.No.135 part, situated at Gowtharni Nagar, EdulanaguzL apally Village, Ramachaldrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy Distric,. ifor brevity, .,the subject property") and threatening to disposse; i the petitioner from her p1ot, without issuing any notice arld .r lthout following due process of 1aw, as itlegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner furtht:. submits that, while admitting the matter, this Court passed intr rim order dated

17.12.2021 directing the official respondents not o interfere with the petitioner's possession over the subject prc,, rerty, except in accordance with the procedure established by lzr v. However, in spite of lapse of more than four years, the respon lent authorities have not filed counter or vacate petition for denyirr 1 the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit. In r,i :w of the same, learned counsel requested this Court to allow the il/rit Petition by directing the respondent authorities not to in t :rfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject 1r operty without following due process of 1aw.

4. On the other hald, learned Assistant Gov: .nment pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is in p< ssession of the subject property, the respondents will not in1( rfere u,ith the 3 petitioner's possession over the subject property, without following due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders.

5. In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property, without following due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if aly, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/-T. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT DDY ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Special Chief Secretary to Govt, The State of Telangana, , Revenue Department, BRK Bhavan, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Principal Secretary to Govt, The State of Telangana, tr/A and UD Department, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy. 5. The Tahsildar, Ramchandrapuram [t/andal, Sangareddy District. 6. The Commissioner, Tellapur Municipality, Tellapur, Sangareddy District. 7. One CC to Sri Eslavath Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

9. One CC to Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, SC for Municipality[OPuc] 10.Two CC to The GP for lVunicipal Administration Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[Oufl '1 1 . Two CD Copies TJ HIGH COURT DATED:1711212025 ORDER WP.No.34549 of 2021 i3 ( c) t] I JAti ?r?6 Z i.,-\ * .- ^-." ,: ) .2./ . ;?' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS t \ h tC