lVI. Srinivas v. The State of Telangana

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of ltilandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioner from the date of completion of 5 years of service i.e,.

04.04.1986 to 03.04.1991, but the respondents authorities regularized the petitioner services w.e.t 18.12.2009 vide proceedings in Rc. No. C1124012006 dated 18.12.2OO9, issued by the 6th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary; unreasonable and violation of principles of natural justice and apart from violation of Article 'i4 of the constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondents to regularize the servrces of the petitioner from the date of completion of 5 years of servrce i.e., on 04 04.1986 to 03.04.1991 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits and all other consequential benefiti. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15.1 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consjder I regularize the services of the petitioner from completion of 5 years of service i.e., on 04.04.'1986 to 03.04.1991 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4: Gp FOR SERVICES-l Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR SERVICES-lll Counsel for the Respondent No.5 & 6: SRI RAMESH CHILLA, S.C. FOR MUNICIPALITIES The Court made the following: ORDER I I i I I I I I I I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.26ao7 0F 2025 ORDER: With the consent of the parties, this Writ.petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliel "... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus detlaring thl action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioner from the date of completion of 5 years of service i.e., 04.O4.]9a6 to 03.04.1991, but the respondents authorities regularized the petitioner services w.e.t 18.12.2009, vide proceedingJ in Rc. No.C1/24O/2006 dated La.t2.2OOg, issued bv the 66 respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, ,r."."o.ribl" and violation of principles of natural justice and apart from violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequentiy direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner from the date of completion of 5 years of service i.e.. on 04.O4.J9a6 to 03.O4.1991 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits and a_ll other consequential benelits and to pass..."

3. Heard Sri Ch. Satish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government pleader for Services_l for respondent Nos. 1, 3 ar.d 4, learned Government pleader for Services-lll for respondent No.2 arrd Sri Ramesh Chilla, tearned Standing Counsel for Municipalities appearing for respondent Nos.S and 6. 2 PK,J Wp 26A07 2025

4. Le arned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially appointed on NMR basis on 04.O4.1986.at Manuguru Municipality. He was subsequently transferred to Sathupaliy Municipality and thereafter to Khammam Municipality. While he was serwing at Khammam Municipality, his services were regrrlarized vide Rc.No.Cll24Ol2006, dated 18.12.2O09, with prospective effect. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation to the respondents on 24.O1.2025, with a request to regularize his services from 25.11.1993, for Lhe purpose of pension and pensionary benefits. He further relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in B. Srinivasulu us. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dated 17.08.2O15. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this court to direct respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a stipulated period of time.

5. Learned Government Pleader and learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents submits that since the representation of petitioner is pending before the respondents and respondents will consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.O1 .2025, ald pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law. - t I I I I i I l i 3 PK,J wp-26807 _2025

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondents to consider the representation, dated 24.OL.2025, submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with iaw, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate a copy thereof to the petitioners. Misceilaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. DI SRINIVASA REDDY s ISTANT REGISTRAR To //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administra Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Telanga The Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad, Telangana. Department, State of na. 2 3 4

7. 8 9 10 !4,!.t4. --/. , 'Q' MP BS The Commrssioner and Director of Municipal Adminiskation, 640- AC Guards, PTI Buildings, Hyderabad. The Regional Director cum Appellate, Commissioner of [/unicipal Administration, Warangal, Warangal District. The tVlunicipal Commissioner, Khammam Municipal Corporation, Khammam, Khammam District, The Special Officer, Manuguru Municipality, Mahuguru, Bhadradri Khothagudem District, Erstwhile Khammam District. One CC to SRI CH. SATISH KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Services-|, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CCs to GP for Services-lll, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to SRI RAlt/ESH CHILLA, S C. for Municipalities [OPUC] Two CD Copies CC TODAY I I I I i I I i HIGH COURT DATED:1510912025 i/, a) ) "L 1) :"_ P ?ffi -l :'r 1 -:t ORDER WP.No.26807 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1 q )Z