Anthoty George v. 1. The State of Telangana

2. The Director General of Police, Telangana State at Hyderabad 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda Distrtct. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda Division, Nalgonda District. 5 The Station House Officer, Nalgonda Rural Police StatiEn, Nalgonda District 6. Kuthuru Srinivas Reddy, S/o K. Laxma Reddy, Aged aborit 5g years, Occ Real Estate Business. il/o Gandhinagar, beside Chinna Venkat Reddy Function Hall. Nalgonda Town and District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ. order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring action of the Respondent Nc.5 in interfering into Petitioners peaceful life and liberty, threatening to settle the civil dispute with the Respondent No. 6 and hand over Petitioner's 1200sq yards in Plot Nos.540, 541 , 544, 545,546 and 547 in Sy No 796/A, Ward No. l Block No 5 situated at Mahendra Hills, Nalgonda Town and District to the Respondent No. 6 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of articles 14, 15,21 and 300-A of constitution of lndia. consequent ldirect the Respondent No. 5 not to interfere into Petitioner's peaceful life and Iiberty as well as ctvil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 6 with regard to 1200sq yards rn Plot Ncs 540,541 ' 544,545' 546 and 547 in Sy No. 796/4, Ward No.1, Block No 5 situi,rted at Mahendra Hills, Nalgonda Town and District. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the r;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High corrrt may be pleased to direct the Respondent No 5 not to interfere into civil dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 6 with regard to 1200sq yards in Plot Nos 540.541 , 544,545,546 and 547 in Sy No 796/4, Wa'd No 1, tslock No 5 situated at Mahendra Hills, Nalgonda Town and District arrd further not to cause hindrance to the Petitioner's life and ltberty. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : - The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.25810 of 2025 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for I Iorne appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 With their consent, this writ pctition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself

2. This writ petition has been filecl seeking the following prayer:- "to declnre tlr action oJ- tlr llasporulerul No.5 in interfering into Pctitioners penceful Li.fe nttd libarty, tlvcatening to settle the cipil dispute utitlt tle Rcspondctrt No.6 mul lnnd oaer Petitioners 7200sq yards in PLot Nos.540, 541, 544, 545, 546 and 547 in Sy No.796/A, Wnrd No.7, Block No.S, situatud nt Molrcrtdra HiLls, Nalgondn Town nnd District, to tfu Respotulcrul No.6 is illcgal, nrbitrnry and ttiolation of articles 14, 15, 21 ail 300-A of cotrstitulion of India, consequent direcl the Respond,ent No.5 riof lo tnterfere into Petitioner's peaceful life arul Liberty crs uelL as cit,iL disputes betrueen tlu Petitioner and the Respondent No.6 toilh rcgtrd to 120Asq ynrds in PLot Nos.540, 541, 544, 545, 546 nrul 547 itt Sy No.796/A, Warrl No.7, Block No.S, situnted nl A4olrrrclrn I l ls, Nnlgotrdn fott,tr ntd District.l

3. Brief facts in this n,rit petition as staterl are that the petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of lancl atlmeasuring 1200 So.yards in Plot Nos.54C, 541.,544,545, 516 anJ 547 in Sy No.796lA. Ward No.1, Block No.5, situated at Mahendra Hills, Nalgoncla To'ain and District, having acquired the same through registered agreement of Salc-cum-General Power of Attcrney bearing document No.6597 ot 2022 clatecl 13.04.2022. Thereaftcr, the petitioner was in peaceful posscssion of the subjcct propcrty. Thc case of thc petitioner is that respondent No.6 is en-gagccl in roal cstatc business and had purchased ). -- the plot No.542 ancl 543 in Sy.No.796/ A. The respondent No.6 had approached the petitioner to sell his plots on cheaper ratc, I'ow'ever, whcn the petitioner denieC to sell his plots, rcspondent No.6 hatche, I a plan to extort petitioncr's plot:;. Further casc of the pctitioner is that rcsponttcrrt authorities without following due procedurc as contcmplated unrler la rv .rro threatening the petitioner tc settle the dispute with respondent No.6. ,\gg ie vcd by the same, this writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleadcr for Honrt, appearing for respondcnt Nos.1 to 5 placed on record insbructions issucrl Lrv Strb-lnspcctor of Police, Nalgonda Rural Police Station, Nalgonda Distr ict, vr'hereirr it is stated that on 02..09.2025, resporrdent No.6, made a cornplai rt stating that his father Sri.K.Lakshmareddy is having 10 acres of Iand in Sv Nos.U!)6, 795 etc., and they have c,xstructed a compound wall around their l.rncl \1 ith cement bricks and put up a gate and were doing agriculture. It is f ,rrthcl statcd that on 07.09.2025 at about 7.00 Pm, the petitioner along with other'havc illegally demolished the compound wall with JCB and caused loss to an arnount of Rs.90,000/-. Upon the respondent No.6 complaint dated )2.09.2025, crime No.169 of 2025 undcr Section 329(3),324(4) read with 3(5) of thc Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (herein after rcferrcd as 'I3NSS'), dated

02.09.2025 was registered and the case in under investigatiorr

5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petition.'r su bmits that respondent No.5 is calling the petitioner and threatcning hin, to settle disputc with respondent No.6 anci pray this Court to direct the respo rclcnt ,tuthorities ,t ,/ J not to interfere into the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.6

6. Recording thc submissions made by learnecl counsel appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to follow due procedure as contemplated under law before initiating any action on petitioner. it is made clear that thc petitioner shall co-operate with the pending investigation in crime No.169 of 2025 dated 02.09.2025.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposecl of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pencling, shall stand closed. No order as to //TRUE COPYII SD/- . JAWAHAR REDDY STANT REGISTRAR To 1 SECTION OFFICER ecreta t,qState of Telangana The.Principal Secretary. Home Department, S at Hyderabad.

2. The Director General of police, Telangana State at UyOerJbaO. 3. The Superintendent or potice, irraiq""ir'ijiiirji " 4' The Deputy Superintendent p"ri*,G"oJnol, oiririon, Nargonda District. 5. The Station House offic^er Nirg"ndi'nLii"poilJstrtron, Nargonda District 6. Two cCs to Gp ron Honrre, ilgh C";rt'f;, tXlttat" or Tetansana at 7. One CC to SRt RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate tOpUCl B. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUTI "r SA BS I 1 HIGH COURT DATE D:0 810912025 ORDER WP.No.26810 of 2025 i 1!ii $EP 2t6 )'., 'l I \o. ,r',- -\:.--=. --- -a- DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. 1,1 ttlllw-