✦ High Court of India · 15 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,271 words

The State Of Telangana, Endowments Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Principal Secretary. The Commissioner of Endowments, State of Telangana, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Hyderabad - 500001 The Additional Commissioner of Endowments, Endowment Department of Telangana, O/o The Commissioner of Endowments, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Hyderabad - 500001 The Regional Joint Commissioner, Endowment Department of Telangana, O/o The Commissioner of Endowments, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Hyderabad - 500001 The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Warangal, Warangal District Sri Veerabhadra Swamy Devasthanam, Kuravi Village and Mandal- 506105, lVlahabubabad District, Rep. by its Executive Officer. ...RES'ONDENTS AND 1 2 a J 4 6 Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of I\,4ANDAI\,4US, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 herein in not considering for promotion and appointment of the Petitioner herein who is working as Archakulu on Regular Time Scale, as Chief Archakulu / Mukhya Archakulu of 6th Respondent Temple / Sri Veerabhadra Swamy Devasthanam, Kuravi Village and lvlandal, Mahabubabad District - 506105, in spite of Petitioner is possessing the necessary qualifications and being placed at Serial No.1 at the list of Archakas forwarded by the 6th Respondent hereln vlde its Proceedings in Rc.No.SVBSDl(EsttlltAN2O22, dated 2510112025 as well as Proceedings in Rc.No.SVBSDt(Esttll\i1A12022, dated 01i08/2024, as contemplated under Section 35 of Act 30 of 1987, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and '16 of Constitution of lndia and Consequently direct the Respond: rts herein to consider the case of the Petitioner herein for promotion and a >pointment as Chief Archakulu of 6th Respondent Temple / Sri Veerabhadra S wamy Devasthanam, Kuravi Village and IVlandal, I\rlahabubabad District - 50611) ;, by considering the representation of the Petitione r dated 1210712025 and 291091 'O24, forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ri cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Co rt may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to consider the case of th€ Petitioner herein for promotion and appointment as 'Chief Archakulu' of 6th Res rondent Temple / Sri Veerabhadra Swamy Devasthanam, Kuravi Village and l/ tndal, Mahabubabad District - 506105, by considering the representatton ol the Petitioner dated 12.07.2025 and 29.09.2024, pending disposal of the above / rit Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KONDAPARTHI SRINIVASI Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 5: GP FOR SERVICEI I Counsel forthe Respondent No.6: SRI CH. SATISH KUMr\ t SC FOR ENDOWMENl'I The Court made the following: ORDER / THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.26752 0F 2oi25 ORDER: With the consent of the parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itseif.

2. This Writ petition is hled under Articl e 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: ". .. to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring thi action of the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 herein in not considering for promotion and appointment of the Petitioner herein who is working as Archakulu on Regular Time Scale, as Chief Archakulu/Mukhya Archakulu of 6ft Respondent Temple/Sri Veerabhadra Swamy Devasthanam, Kuravi Viltage and Mandal, Mahabubabad District - 506105, in spite of petitioner is possessing the necessary qualihcations and being placed at Serial No.1 at the list of Archakas forwarded by the Stir Respondent herein Rc. No. SVB SD K / Estt / M A / 2022, d,ated, 2 S. O I . iO2 S as well as Proceedings in Rc.No.SVBSDK/Estt/M Al2022, d,ated, 01.O8.2O24, as contemplated under Section 35 of Act 30 of 1987, as. illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondents herein to consider the case of the Petitioner herein for promotion and appointment as Chief Archakulu of 6fr Respondent Temple/Sri Veerabhadra Swamy Devasthanam, Kuravi Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District - 506 i OS, by considering the representation of the Petitioner dated |2.OZ.2O2S arrd 29.O9.2024, forthwith to pass..." proceedings

3. Heard Sri Kondaparthi Srinivasa, learned counsei for the petitioner, learned Government pleader for Services_I for l J 2 Pl{,J Wp-26152 2025 .= respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Sri. Ch.Salish Kumar, lear:: :d Standing Counsel for Endowments appearing for respondent No t ,.

4. Learned counsei for the petitioner submit r that the petitioner is working as Archakulu since 12.O3.199C, and as per the rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.261, Revenue (Endts.I) . )epartment, dated 20.O5.2OO2 and G.O.Ms.No.888, Revenrr : (Endts.l) Department, dated 08.12.200O, he is eligible and r ualified for promotion to the post of Mukhya Archaka. Thereforr: he made a representation to the respondent No.2 on 29.O9.2024 c rquesting to consider his case for promotion to the post of Mukhya I rchaka and further learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indnle :nce of this court to direct respondents to consider the representa:: rn made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within L period of stipulated period of time.

5. Learned Government Pieader for the responder t Nos. 1 to 5 submits that since the representation of petitioner is I :nding with the respondent No.2 and respondent No.2 will r:r nsider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.09 .2024 , and pass appropriate orders, in accordalce with law.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by lezrrr ed counsel for the respective parties ald without going into the rr erits of the case, thrs Writ Petition is disposed of directing responc:nt No.2 to 3 PK,J Wp-267522025 consider the representation, dated 29.09 -2025, submitted by the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.261, Revenue (Endts.l) Department, dated 20.05.2OO2 and G.O.Ms.No.888, Revenue (Endts.l) Department, dated 08. 12.2OOO and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate a copy thereof to the petitioners. Miscellaneous petitions pending, il any, shall stand closed' There shall be no order as to costs SD/-L. VIJAYA LAXMI S ISTANT REGISTRAR T //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat Buildings, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 'Endowments, Road, Hyderabad - 500001

2. The Commissioner.of : fne AOOitiona[ Commissioner of Endowments, Endowment Department of Telangana, O/o The Commissioner of Endowments, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road. Hvderabad - 500001 State of Telangana, Eoggulakunta, Tilak +. The Regional Joint Commissioner, Endowment Department of Telangana, O/o ThdCommissioner of Endowments, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Hvderabad - 500001

5. Tlie Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Warangal, Warangal District o. The Executive officer, sri Veerabhadra swamy Devasthanam, Kuravi Village and Mandal- 5061 05, Mahabubabad District.

7. One CC to SRI KONDAPARTHI SRINIVASA' Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I, High Court for the State of Telangana 9. bne CC to SRI CH. SATISH KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 10. Two CD Copies touTl MMT BS HIGH COURT DATED:1510912025 ORDER WP.No.26752 of 2025 ,/t1-'t 1 l.: r ifii5 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITON WITHOUT COSTS (D vvr " tfr.rlts

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments