High Court · 2025

Counsel for thc Appellant: Sri P.Racll.rive Retldy Counsel for the Respondent No.1: -- Counsel for the Responr,'lent No.2: Sri A.Ramakrishna Reddy The Court made the follon,ing: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE NAGESH BH.E EMAPAKA M.A.C.M.A. No.7Ol of 2Ol2 JUDGMENT: This Appeal is preferred by the appellarr challenging the order dated 03. lO.20l 1 passed by the Mc :or Accident Claims Tribunal cum - III Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Nizamabad, in MVOp No.687 of 2t 05,

2. The ma tter \l,as referred to the Lok.Adalat, whereupon an Award dated 08.03.2025 was p: I sed. A copy of the Awarcl is placed on record.

3. In that vieu, of the matter, this Appeal is lisposed of in terms of the Award dated 08.03.2025 passec n the Lok Adalat. No costs Pending rniscellaneous applications, if tny, sha_11 stand closed SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL I EPUTY REGISTRAR . ;llcTION OFFICER ,lDistrict&Sessions I / / |RUE COPY / / To,

1. The Motor Acciclcnts Claims fribunal_c unr-lll Atl Judge (Fas t Tr.ack Court) Nizan-rabacl One CC to Sri P.Ra ,-i hive Rcclcly, r\d vocatc loPUCl One CC to Sri A.R amakrish na Redcjy, AcJvoca te [OPUC Two CD Copie.s 2 3 4 (Along with copy of l-ok r\clalat arvarcl clateci 0g.03. JCKIPSL 2025 ) W HICH COURT DATED:17/06/2025 - ,z- .'.1- ttl' r-I.r,r.'-: " l.r. ..) -:-- ORDER MACMA.No.707 of 2012 i, 1l I 0[ [iC, 2025 Disposing of the Ir4.A.c.lr1.A. in terms of lok adalat awarcl *,it rout costs ()', [hr B \ BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMAAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. lunder Section 1 9 of the Legat Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] Date: 08-03-2025 Present:1. Hon'ble Sri Justice Anit Kumar Jukanti, (Judge, Hon,ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Sri S.Arun Kumar, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A.NO.7O1 of 2O12 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST O.P. No. 687 of 2OO5 Motor Accidents Claims Tribunat-cum- lll Addt. District & Sessions Judge (Fas t Track Court) Nizamabad) ocH <J HIGH,COURT LOK ADALAT E* i2i,, . ii: (On the file of the Between:- Domata Dharmaji, 5/o. D. Govind, Aged: 40 years, Occ: Taitor, R/o. H. No.1 3-190, Communiry Hatt Road, Vinayaknagar, Nizamabad Dist rict . ..C laimants/Appel lants AND 1 7 Kutachary Sampath Rao, S/o. Mohan Rao, aged 30 years, Occ: Owner of Hero Honda Motor Cycte bearing No. Ap-5_T_ R- B_gg7g, R/o. Nadipatty Viltage of Dichpatty Mandat, Nizamabad District. The Bajaj Allianz Generat lnsurance Company Limited, GE Ptaza, Airport road, Yerawad, pune-411006, rep. by its Brarlch M/s. Venkateshwara Enterprises, H.No. 5-6-670l34/1, Swarna Comptex, Hyderabad Road, Nizamabad District. (Poticy bearing No. 10008883 vatid from Z4-12-?OO4 to 23.12-2005). Counsel for Appe[tant / Ctaimant ...Respondents/Respondents : Sri p. Radhive Reddy, Advocate/ Sri Kutdeep.Jadhav, Advocate counsel for Respondent No.1 /rnsurance company: sri A. Ramakrishna Reddy, Advocate Representative of lnsurance Company : Ms. D. Mithravinda, LegaI Executive This appeat having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned counset for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: A r-'- ( C'r/ , Compe by the Trib ion Awarded Compensa ron Awarded t (Setttemen t Reached) in the Lok Adatat. SERY o * ts,ifff's -.,1 * {'tala

6.1 / l / / I j rtionment oi ensation if an Addit ional Dlrection(s): AWARD Rs.6 tre Cl Lok Adatat. 3,000-@upees su[t hree th I rsand only) with propo rtiona\. rm the date of the petition titt costs and interest at 6% per annum I the date of realization. This pppeal has been preferred by armant aggrieved by the order passed in OP No.687 of 2005 I y rhe Motor Accident Ctaims Tribunal -cum-llt Addt. Dist rict & Sess tns.Judge (Fast Track Court) Nizamabad. The Legat E xecutive of lnsurance Company and the Appeltan t /C{aim a n t atong with his cour sel have appeared before the During the pendency of this Appea, both the parties reported compromise and entered into a setfler r rnt and in view of the same the Respondent No.2-lnsurance Cbm : tnY has agreed to pay an amount of Rs.2,00,000/_ (Rupees Two akhs onty) towards fult and final setttement apart fro m the amourl already deposited and the Appettant/Ctaiman t has agreed to recerv. the same towards futf and final settlement of his cfar.m. Accorc ingly, the compromise is recorded and the case is set ed b efore t te Lok Adalat In view of the above settlement the I espondent No.2_lnsurance Company sha deposi t the above sai d anrr unt within two (2) months from the date of receipt of 6opy of 4! ard, aFter deducting the amount that was deposited, if any ln tle event of defautt or detay rn making such deposit, the Appella ntlCl; mant is entitled to claim interest as awarded by the lower tribuna _ grven credit to. '1. The Appettant is entitted to the refund 2. The amount atready deposited by the j. Soon after deposit by the lnsurance Compal permitted to withdraw.^^ ^^.._-'"" ln token or.rrrun' the entire amount. of Court Fee paid irr his appea( lnsurance Compapy, if any, shaI be Lurnpany, the Appell lnt/Claimant is counser have signed this ln terms of the col disposed of. "-l:j::[:::;:::'",*, and award, the r ]rties and rheir mpromise arrived at between the parties, t ris case stands L .l ' c-' -r^ I i l ) I I ,\Ac_rna e4 1.\l v Appellant (s) 7 /",*.€ 2 olr + la-,"n r'(D. J] s or^X? UV,fnali b QoutnC . -ft-4 ) a''t*r .<ffcuwtl c p 6?( lroo<- Respondent (s) I he r\"lq AL)io nz_ Qo* r^l L,. .r,;r, tce (o)(\f L,J/ Nizot.,Lo..J <-f- For Eajaj Atli General Insur Co. ttd Aut orised Signa tory t Counsel '-=l Jl- for@-p-peilant (s) Counsel for the Respondent (s) 4Y CHAIRAAAN ), M BER e) )