✦ High Court of India · 25 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Sep 2025

Court

High Court of India

Decided

25 Sep 2025

Bench

Not available

Length

1,571 words

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code §498 Indian Penal Code

2. Smt. Sistla Jyothi, Wo. AfrozShaik @ Afroz S, D/o. Suryanarayana Sharma, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rep. by her GPA Holder Sri SistlaNagender, S/o. Suryanarayana Sharma, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee. R/o. 12-1 1-1664/4//, Warasiguda, Musheerabad Mandal, Hyderabad ...RespondenUDe-facto complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the charge sheet in C.C. No. 2614/2024 on the file of lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District, at LB Nagar l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C. No. 261412024 on the file of Honble lll Additional Judicial [Vlagistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District, at l ..-.-..-- LB Nagar, pending disposal of the Criminal quash petition, rn the interest of ' justice l.A.NO:3&4OF202t; l.A. NO: 3 ot 2025 Petition under Se<lion 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit a ong with permission Petition, the H gh Court may be pleased to permit the parties to compound the offences in C.C. No. 261412024 on the file of the lll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rarga Reddy District, At, LB Nagar. Between: Smt. Sistla Jyothi, Wo AfrozShaik @ Akoz S, D/o. Suryanara\/ana Sharma, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rep. by her GPA Holderr Sri SistlaNagender, S/o. Suryanarayara Sharma, Aged about 35 years, Occ Pvt. Employee. Rlo. 12-11-16641N7, Warasiguda, Musheerabad Mandal, Hyderabad. ... Petitioner/llespondent No. 2 in l.A. I'lc,s. 3 & 4 ot 2025 AND

1. Sri. Afroz Shaik @ r\froz S, S/o. Mehmood S, Aged about :|4 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rlo. 4'4-100190Ci 1 , Radio Station Road, Yr:ragera Layout, Raichur, Karnataka State.

2. Smt. Zareena Beg rm, Wo. MehmoodShaik, Aged abor( 56 years, Occ. House wife, R/o. 44-100/90C/1, Radio Station Road. Yeragera Layout, Raichur, Karnataka State

3. The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad. ... Respondentr;i Respondents in l.A. ltlos.3 & 4 of 2025 l.A. NO: 4 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in tlre circumstances stated in the Joint Memo of Compromise along with Comprorrise Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the terms of compronrise between the parties herein in C.C llo. 261412024 on the file of the lll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, llanga Reddy District, At. LB Nagar. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Dappu --------7 Venkataiah, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithendra Rao Veeramalla, " Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri [\il. Bhoopati, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 in/and CRIIYI|NAL PETITION No.1'1578 ot 2025 COMMON ORDETI: 1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/acr:used Nos.1 and 2 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking tc, quash the proceedings agairst them in C.C.No.2614 of 2024 or the file of lll Additional Judicial ltlagistrate of First Class, Ranga Reody District at L.B.Nagar, for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 495 of IPC 2 lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 as well as respondent No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present Crininal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise tretween them and to compouncj the offences

3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto atmplainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly \ \ \ 2 ( rlp I li18 2025 .l consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vrde orders dated 09.09.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated '15.09.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.2614 of 2024 on the file of lll Additional Judicial Itlagistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2, are hereby quas.l,€d subject to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 paying an ., t rlp t 1573 :025 amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) :o the Director, Sainik Welfare l'{yderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (2(1070), IFSC Code:SB1N0020070, MICR No.500004057) and to :he Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court fcr the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) werrks from today and file proof of thr3 same before the Registry 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. \ To, SD/- A. SRI:ENIVASA REDOY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// 6- SE(]TION OFFICER

1. The lll Additional Judicial magistrate of First Class, Ranga tleddy District, at L.B. Nagar.

2. The Station House ()fficer, Women Police Station, Rachakonda. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, State of Telangana, Higir Court Buildings, at Hyderabad (OUTr

4. One CC to Sri. Dappu Venkataiah Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri tvl. Bhoopati, Advocate [OPUC] 6 Two CD Copies (enclosed a copy of joint memo) o DL/PSL Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri D. Venkataiah, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the l-lon'ble Court vide order dated 25.09.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousarrd only ) to the ''Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Coul for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 110248 of 2025 dated 08 10.2025 I HIGH COURT DATED:25l09/2025 TE( ,4 4 {\ i)jr r'7 COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 3 and 4 oI 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11578 OF ALLOWING THE I.A.. I\IOS. 3 AND 4 OF 2025 AND CRIMINAL PETI]ION \ p I a IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Between: CRL. PETITION No. OF 2025

1. Sri. AfrozShaik (@ Afroz S, S/o. Mehmood S, Agcd about 34 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, Rlo. 4-4 lOOlgOC/1, Radio Station Road, Yeragera Layout, Raichur, Karnataka State.

2. Smt. Zareer;,a Begum, W/o. MehmoodShaik, Aged about 56 years, Occ: House wife, Rlo. 4-4-1OO l9OC/ 1, Radio Station Road, Yeragera Layout, Raichur, Karnataka State ... Petitioners/Accused No. 1 & 2 AND

1. The State of Telalgana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, Fligh Court of Hyderabzrd Respondcnt/ Complzrinzrnt

2. Srnt. SistlaJyothi, W/o. AfrozShaik @ Afroz S, D/o. Suryanarayana Sharma, Agcd about 34 years, Occ: Brt. Employee, Rep. by hcr GPA Holder Sri SistlaNagender, S/o Suryanarayana Sharma, Aged about 35 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, Rlo. 12- | l- 1664 / A/7 , Warasiguda, Musheerabad Manda], Hvderabad. Respondent/Dc facto Complainant JOINI'MEMO

1. The Petitioners ale the Accused in C.C. No. 2614 /2024 on the file of the Hon'ble III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ralga Reddy District, At: LB Nagar. Based on ttre complaint made by the De-Facto Compiainant, the Saroornagar Womens Police Station registered FIR No. 72212024 for the offence U/sec. 498-4,495 iPC Recently the matter has been settled between the parties. The De-facto 2. Complainant has no interest to prosecute the Petitioner and accordingly she has no objection to allou' tlrt: criminal petition and quash the p:'o,:ssdings before th court against the Pctitioner herein. Since the matter has l:een settled bet',,reen the parties, the further proceedings b'efore the trial court is abuse of process of law. Hence th is r.rr'rrr., Hyderzrbar[. $k"41 tj c:,t' PETITIC) NE RS 9 FOR THt' ITETITITJNE-R ( COUNS g nt'?t'1" .],.I RtrSPONDENT v\r COUNS trL FY) N.-d R TFIE 2-' RESPONDEN'f