Heard Sri v. Raghunath, Iearned Senior Designated counsel representing sri sanjeev Kalvala, le

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not renewing the petitioner renewal application 15.09.2022 to run Residential Hostel issuing fresh tender notification dt.07.09.2022 through News Paper calling application without paying the pending due amount of Rs.16,10,000/- to the petitionerfirm is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider and renewal the application of the petitioner dt.15.09.2022 as per notification dt.07.09.2022 through News Paper. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider and renew the application of the petitioner dt.15.O9.2022 as per notification dt.07.09.2022 through Daily News Paper for further period of two years, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.RAGHUNATH, SENIOR COUSEL FOR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI GORLA BHASKAR, SC FOR SST Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SMT. P.K.KALYANI ' SRI KALVALA SANJEEV The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.36179 of 2022 ORDER: Heard Sri V. Raghunath, Iearned Senior Designated counsel representing sri sanjeev Kalvala, learned counser appearing on behalf of petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and Z, Sri Gorta Bhaskar, learned standing counsel for samagra siksha Telangana, appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 and Smt. p.K. Kalyani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4.

2.. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under: "...to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not renewing the petitioner renewal application 15.09.2022 to run Residential Hostel issuing fresh tender notification dt.07.09.2022 through News paper calling application without paying the pending due amount of Rs.16,10,000/- to the petitioner firm is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequenUy direct the respondent to consider and renewal the application 2 of the petitioner dt.15.09.2022 as per dt.O7.09.2022 through News Paper and pass,..". SN..I wP 36t79 2022 notification

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner society is a registered society, established for upliftment of the development of poor children, downtrodden, orphan. The petitioner made representation before the 4th respondent for renewal of permission to run the Urban Residential Hostel. It is further case of the petitioner that pending the renewar application of the petitioner, the respondents issued notification on i5.09.2022 calling for application for running of orphans, street begging boys and girls at Hyderabad Urban Residentiar Hostel. The petitioner society got heavy loss during the acidemic year 2020-2021 clue to non-payment of salaries to the teaching and non-teaching staff and the petitioner society sought further extension of renewal of urban Residential Hostel permission. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not renewing the petitioner's renewal application dated 15.09.2022 to run Residential Hostel and issuing fresh tender notification dated 07.09.2022 by respondents without paying the pending due amount of Rs.16,10,000/- to the petitioner society, the I i , i i j j ; i 3 s2il2i wp rarzs petitioner approached the court by filing the present writ petition. PERUSED THE RECORD:

4. Learnea Senior Oes submissions:- i) Though the petitioner had filed renewal application on 15.09.2022 to run Residential Hostel no orders had been passed on the said application of the petitioner dated 15.09. 2022 as on ii) In spite of a detailed representation dated 01.11.202L addressed to the 4th respondent herein for release of salary bills pertaining to Urban Residential Hostel at Kotla Alijha, charminar in Hyderabad for the year 2oL7-2otg, no orders had been passed on the said representation of the petitioner as on date. Hence, therefore, the writ petition could be disposed.of directing the concerned respondents to pass appropriate orders on petitioner's application dated 15.09.2022 and the representation of the petitioner dated 01.11.2o2t addressed to the 4th respondent herein. 4 SN. J wP 36179 2022 Based on the aforesaid submissions, the learned senior desionatecl counsel t:opearinq on behalf of the oetitioner contends that t[g.oetitioner is entitled for the for bv the oetitioner in the Dresent writ relief as Dra oetition.

5. The learned counsel aooearinq on alf of the resoondent No.4 contends that insofar as the qrievance of the oetitioner for passing of orders on the aoplication of petitioner dated 15.O9.2022 for renewal of tlre license is concerned, it has alreadv be license had been qranted bv the respondents' the sanre is hgwever disouted trv the lsarned counsel aopearino on behalf of the petitioner, who contends that no orders had been passed on the application of the petitioner' dated O5.09.2O22. seekino renewal to run Residential Hostel at Kotla Alijah, Charminar at Hyderabad and insofar as the grievance of the oetitioner as put forth by the petitioner vide petitioner's reoresentation, dated O1.11.2O21 addressed to the 4th resoondent is concerned, learned counsel apoearinq on behalf of the resoondents contends reasonable time oeriod mav be orovided to the I I i I t 5 SN, J wP_36179_2022 4th resoondent for takino action on the said representation of the petitioner. seekinq release of due salary oertaining to the bills of the staff of urban Residential Hostel at Kotla Alijha. Charminar at Hyderabad.

6. Takinq into consideration : (a) The facts and circumstances of the case, (b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4, (c) The application of the petitioner dated L5.O9.2O22 seeking renewal to run Urban Residential Hostel at Kotla Alijha, Chariminar in Hyderabad, ' (d) The representation of the petitioner dated O1.1L.}OZL addressed to the 4th respondent herein which had been acknowledged by the 4th respondent on

01.1L.2O2L itself, but however no action had been taken as on date, The writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to pass appropriate orders on the renewal application of the petitioner, dated 05.Og.2022, in accordance to law to run Residential Hostel if not already 6 SN, J wP:)6t79_2022 passed, within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The 4th respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated O1.1L.2O2t addressed to the 4th respondent seeking release of due salary for the bills pertaining to the staff of Urban Residential Hostel at Kotla AIijha, Charminar at Hyderabad for the year 2OL7-2O18, and pass appropriate orders on the said representation dated O1.11.2O2t in accordance to law, within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and duly communicate the decision to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ' As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, any pending, in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed. SD/.C. DEEPIKA ISTANT REGISTR^AR I //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER Hvd The (Samagra S The District

1. The Pri ncipal Secretary bad, State of Tel School Education Depa langana Commissioner and Director of School Education/ State Pro,ject Director Secretariat

2. Siksha, Hyderabad iksha), State of Telangana, Saifabad. Hyderabad Collector and Chairman, Sa 3. Siksha, 4. The District Educational Officer and Ex. , Project 5. One CC to SRI KALVALA SANJEEV, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two ccs to GP FoR scHool EDUCATION, High court for the state of 7. One CC to SRI GORLA BHASKAR, SC FOR SST IOPUC] 8. One CC to SMT. P.K.KALYANI, Advocate [OPUC]- 9. Two CD Copies Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Hyderabad Officer. Sa Officio District To PSK. BS ^lr i. '-'-:ffi.=j{}a. -' CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:1711012025 ORDER WP.No.36179 of 2022 ETH S C) AJI2 1,1 2C?[ * * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS j{ 4v