High Court · 2025

1. The state of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor High court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana

2. Smt. Jammonipally Lavanya, W/o,.Ramesh, aged2.7 years, occ. Housewife Thirumata d;;Gi6"lly Viriigb Hlo. Thangellapillv Kondurg Mandal, RangareddY District ...RespondenUComPlainant petition under Section 528 of BNSS Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the proceedings in SC No. 212 of 2022 on the file of court of the Special Sessionb Judge for Fast Tracking the cases relating to Atrocities against Women-Xlll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar against the petitioner/ accused. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY of all further proceedings in SC No. 212 of 2022 on the file of court of the Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the cases relating to Atrocities against Women-Xlll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar, including the appearance of the petitioner/ accused, pending disposal of the above criminal petition. l.A. NO: 2 OF 202s Between: iffi ,*:[t'#f ;iy,i,;,,ii]ril[i3fiHfi ir;i3f,r,?J#",il",,,?;:,i"#"","#r300, AND

1. Beri Vr FJ"r""r",jlkfi'ril?t, "'petitioner/Resp No.2/Defacto comprainant r?,,3;, 8[3fli'"7,?lb;fl",fl,:r",rft3,.?,p"::ranJfi:t,re R/o ...RespondenUAccused

2. Thestateof Totc^^^h^ h rd ini'3i?,T Ji+iffi;X", o, Pu bric Prose '"':.Hl,s|,n$tt:Ii;j:,x??,, petition under section 359(6). of BNSs p?ilg. that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of c;ine, oicii,"i#r1:Jirirn,.*re- pleased to permit ,'" pliitilrL) zrJ i""d;U;, herein to rire ih" ursh court may be petition seeking_to,e,r1n'in-"'-proceeoing, in SC..rrro.. 212 of ioiii_onthe fite of "orpromise court of the .oggigi sur"ionJ ju.os" rii ilJirrackins th.-;;"; reratins to wom"n-irri'iioiti6nri birtn:li jrog", f$i,ffi.asainst Ransa neJoy District at t.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 a s a i nst w"r"' xr ffi;il"' Petition under section 3s9(2), or pf_ss praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of crimirialletition,.the High court may be pleased to record the comprorir" .r11 q*"r, tr,. proceedings in sc No. 212 ot 2022 on the file of court or irre sp""i"r sessions JroL" Fast rracking the cases r'Dir,,.i"t J,ig I ]'R"" ga Reddy ;:!lli:? ",",-A'iilffi: This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing f,he Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. Jetty Anjaneyulu' Advocate for the Petitioner and the Mr. V. Jithender Rao, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Mr. M. vinod Kumar Advocate for the Respondent No.2. ", " The GOurt made the following: oRDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 20125 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1 1 562 of 2O2S Date: o,4.12.2o.25. Between : Beri Venkataiah AND . . . . Petitioner/ Accused The State of Telangana represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad and another Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been liled by the petitionerf accused seeking to quash the proceedings in S.c.No.2l2 of 2022, on the file of the special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the cases relating to Atrocities against women-cum-Xlll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

2. Heard Mr.Jetty Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr.v.Jithender Rao, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State. 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes pending between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o2s seeking permission to compromise the matter and to record the compromis<.' entered between them.

4. This court uide order, dated o8.o9.2o25, directed the parties i.e., the petitioner and respondent No.2, to appear before the High court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad, on or before lz.og.2o2s. In compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High court Legal services committee, has submitted report, dated 17.og.2025, stating that the petitioner and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that the parties have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise.

5. In view of the said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o2s are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in S.rl.No.212 of 2022, on the Iile of the Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the cases relating to Atrocities against Women-cum-XIII Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, are hereby quashed against the petitioner'. \ \ "- _v J

6. Accordingly, the criminal Petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand on$) to the High court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad and Rs.1o,oo0/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates AsSociation, Hyderabad, within two weeks from today. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. PC To, I/TRUE COPYII OFFICER I 1' The special sessions Judge. for fast_tracking the cases retating to Atrocities against women-cum-Xlll Additional District iudge, Ranga i"iov District at L.B. Nagar. 2. House officer, Jiiled-chowdarigudem porice station, Rangareddy 3' Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, State of Telangana, High Court Buildings, 4. One CC to Mr. Jetty Anjaneyulu, Advocate [OpUC] 5. Two CD Copies at Hyderabad (OUT) I[:r:fr,.n DL a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) Note: Total Amount of Rs. 3s,ooo/- ( Rupees Thirty five thousand onry ) has been paid by Sri Jefti Anjaneyulu,, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon,bte cour:t vide order dated 08J22025 as Rs. 2s,ooot- ( Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) to the " High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 145g3g of zo2sdated 16.12.2025. HIGH COURT DATED:0811212425 (1. ORDER l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 ot 2O25 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11562 OF 2025 A.LLOWNG THE I.A.NOS.2 AND 3 OF 2025 AND CRIMINAL PETITION t MEMORANDUM OF CRL.MISC. PETITION (FILED UNDER sECTroN sss (z)OF BNSS) IN THE HIGH CO-YIIOFIUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FoR THE sraie oF TELANceNa- "" Between:- I.A. No. of 202s Criminal petition No. of 2025 In Beri Venkataiah I/:. lhrldraiahd,.aged 35 years, Occ. Agricutture It/o' Peerjapur ViIIaE", liflJJ ct i,o*igudem Mandal Rangareddy District .. Petitioney'Accused AND 1) The State of Telanana _Rep. by public prosecutor High Court at HyderabuJfo, the State of Telangana ?)-. _Smt. |ammonipally Lavanva Y/o:lu*esh, aged iz vi*+ o".l Horru*ir" I{o. Thirumat a q":""iprily fifilrg" fllo. Thange I I apally Kondurg Mandal, nu"g,rr"iay oirtri.t ! . . Respon dent/ Complainant IOINT MEMO It is submitted that the petitioner/ 1) accused herein filed the above Criminar petition seeking to quash the proce_edings in sc No. 212 0f 2022 on the file of court of the speciar sessions ]udge for Fast Tracking the cases relating to atrocities against women-xlll Additionar District Iudge, Ranga Reddy District ar LB Nagar for arleged offence ;;;sections g41., s06, gz6 r/w 51r Ipc wherein the petitioner is figured as sore Accused. 2) It is submitted that at the instance of elders and well-wishers, of the petitioner and the defacto complaina*t are intervened in to the matter and both the parties are settled the crisputes amicably by entering into Memorandum of Compromise dated 1g.0g.2025 without any coercion or fear and the defacto complainant are v,itlino ":;'__" u,illing and agreed to withdraw the complaint filed by him against the petitioner unconditionally and the case ispendingbeforetheHon,bleCourtallegedoffenceunderSectionsS4l, 506,376rlw 511IPC .L ItisthereforeprayedthattheHon,bleCourtmaybepleasedto recordcompromiseandquashtheSCNo.2l2ot2022onthefileofcourtof theSpecialsessions}udgeforFastTrackingthecasesrelatingtoAtrocities against women-XIII Additional District ]udge, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagarand.topasssuchotherorderorordersasthisHon,bleCourtmay deem fit and ProPer in the circumstances of the case' il1,1"[1]&10,' S"5,( Counsel for the Petitioners Counsel respondent >(Beri*ffi se^ 6J"J^ -l 1d*t. |ammorriPatlY LavanYa ) \