✦ High Court of India · 21 Nov 2025

SRl. Y v. SATYANARAYANA

Case Details High Court of India · 21 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
21 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,024 words

3., K.Lakshma Reddy, S/o. Ramana Reddy Aged Commercial Tax Officer, O/o. CTO, Mahankali Hyderabad 4. P: Subash , S/o. Sathaiah aged 55 years, Assistant Commercial Tax Oiicer, O/o. Deputy Commissionei of Commercial Taxes Begumpet Division, Hyderabad 5. K: Seetharam, S/o. Late K.Narasaiah, aged 55 years, Assistant Comrnercial 6. R. Sridhar, S/o. Rbmaswamy, ale 53 years, Asst. commercial Tax Offtcer, 7. B.Ramkishan Rao, S/o. B.Bhagvanth Rao, Age 54 yeasrs, Assistant O/o. CTO, Mahankali Street, Secunderabad, Hyderabad Tax Oficer, Begumpet Division, Hyderabad Assostant Secunderabad 53 Commercial Tax Officer, O/o. CTO, Hydernagar Circle, Hyderabad (CT.l)Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-22

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue z. tne 'Co'mmissioner of Cornm'ercial Taxes Government of Telangana, -1 3. B. S/o B.Yedaiah, aged 34 yea rs, Occ Asst.Commercial Tax OfFtcer, Nagar, Panjagutta Division, Vengalrao as, Abids, na, D/o Y.Mutyalu, aged 39 years, of the Commercial Tax Officer, Complex, Besides Cherm Officer, Offioe of the Commercial Tax Division, Gagan Vihar Building, Opp Gandhi Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad. Officer, Malakpet Asst.Comnrercial Tax Circle, Charminar

4. Y. Petition under Section 226 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on the statutory appeal preferred by the applicant dated 23.05.2015 taking into consideration of the Govt lvlemo i'lo. ...RESPONDE NTS 5683/C.T.l/2015 dated 29.06.2015 where in a clarification was issued with regard to the finalization of seniority list of ACTOs issued by the Deputy Commissioner of the Commercial Taxes, Secunderabad Division, dated 14.05.2015 in consonance with A.P. State and Sbordinate Services Rules, 1996 r/w A.P.Commercial Tax Subordinate Services Rules, issue in G.O.Ms.No. 81 , Revenue (CT.l) dated 03.07.1990 while holding that non passing of orders on the statutory appeal preferred by the applicants through Govt. issued clarification on 11.06.2015 and 29.06.2015 is illegal, arbitrary against Article 14,16 and 31 1 (2) of Constitution of lndia, besides leing opposed to A.P.Commercial TAx, Subordinate Service Rules. G.O.Ms.NlO.81, dated 03.07.1990 and A.P.State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 NO:1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direction to the Respondent for clarification with regard to following the Govt. Memo No.56B3lCT.1l2O15, dt. 29-06-2015 while disposing the appeal filed by the applicants as dirercted by the Tribunal within the period of 6 weeks from the date of the orders dt. 19-1 1-2015 in O.A.No.482O12015, O.A.No.4581/2015 with C.A. No.736/2015 and 488212015 and Batch I ;20F 201 201

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue 2. The Comnrissioner of Commercial Taxes Govemment of Telangana, (CT.l)Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-22 Hyderabad- l ..APPLICANTS/RESPONDENTS D

1. A. Uma Maheswara Rao, S/o. Late Suryanarayana, aged 54 years, Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, O/o. CTO, SD Road Circle. Begumpet Division, Hyderabad 2. G. Suresh Kumar, S/o. G.Satyanarayanaji, Age 56 years, Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, O/o. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad 3. K.Lakshrna Reddy, S/o. Ramana Reddy Aged 53 years, Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, O/o. CTO, Mahankali Street, Secunderabad Hyderabad 4. P. Subash , S/o. Sathaiah aged 55 years, Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, O/o. Deputy' Commissionei of Commercial Taxes Begumpet Division, Hyderabad

8. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted in O.A.No.458112015, dt.07-08-2015 1 Between:

2. AND .APPLICANTS/UNOFFICIAL RESPONDENTS.3&4

3. K.Lakshma

1. A. Uma Maheswara Rao' S/o. Late Suryanarayana. aged 54 years,.Assostant commercial Tax Officer, O/o. CTO, SD Road Circle' BEgumpet Lliuson' Hvderabad 2. G:-SutESh Kumar, S/o. G.Satyanarayanaii, Age 56- years' .Aslistant commercial Tax officer, o/o. Deputy commissioner of commerclal I axes, Secunderabad Division, HYderabad Aoed 53 vears. Assostant an[ali Streei, Secunderabad Ramana Reddy O/o. CTO, Mah Commercial Tax Hvderabad 4. ij: sriba;h , S/o. Sathaiah aged 55 years, Assistant commerciat Tax officer, ' b'/".-Gprty Commissionei of iommercial Taxes Begumpet Division' Hyderabad S/o. Late K.Narasaiah, aged 55 years, Assistant C,ommercial K. Seetharam, umpet Division, Hyderabad Tax Oficer, Bei, rs, Asst. commercial Tax fficer, R. Srklhar, S/o Hyderabad O/o. CTO, Mahankali nth Rao, Age B.Ramkishan Rao, Commercial Tax fficer, O/o. CTO' HYdernagar Circle, Street, S/o. B.Bhagva 54 yeasrs, Hyderabad Assistant age 53

7. ....RESPONDENTS/APPLICANTS IN O.A. g. The state of Telangana, Represented by -its (CT. l)Deoartment, Secretariat' Hyderabad-22 S. ihe Principal Secretary Revenue -'Coi1missiorier of Comm'ercial Taxes Government of Telangana, Hyderabad-1 .....RESPONDENTS'RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt.02-09-2015 granted in O.A.No.4581/2015 Counsel for the Petitiones: SRl. Y. V. SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court mader the following: OROER t' To, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK t7 ORDER: when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reports no instructions in the matter.

2. In view of the same, this writ petition (TR) is closed. Horvever, petitioner is granted liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy, if the cause still subsists. There shall be no order as to Miscellaneqf_s_pggtipns pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/. P.C. SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFTCER I

1. One cc to s[! Y. v. sATyANSy.4t),tA, Advocate [opUcJ I l}f":r";l",oo,irfoH 3. Two CD Coiies SenvicEs r ;Hlsd'dilil#the stait6r r"r"ng"na at eB M PVL HIGH COIJRT DATED:2'111112025 s.rA lE ? 2 JAN 2026 o c) ( * ORII=Ti] WP(TR).No.4706 ot 2017 cLosrNG THE WR|T PET|TION(TR) WTHOUTCOSTS b \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments