The High Court · 2025

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to pay the deficit coJrt fee of Rs. 42.446t- in LAAS No. 1072 of 2011. lA NO: 9 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praylng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Oetitiol, the High Court may be pleased to receive the copy of Judgment in OP No. 30 of 2012 and batch dt 03-09-2015 against LAAS No. 353 of 2016 and uatdn oateo 16-03-2022 as additional material paper. Counsel for the Appellants: Sri S. Venkateshwar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP for {ppeals LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 1073 OF 2011 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Common Order and Decree dated 02-07-2OOg in O.P.No. 39 of 2008(Award No. 5 of 2007 dI. 04-08-2007) on the file of the Court of the Senlor Civil Judge at Gadwal. Between:

1. Narayana, Sio Papanna, Aged 43 Years (Died per LR'S-A-9 to 13) 2. Saibaba, S/o Papanna, aged 38 years 3. Ramulu, S/o Papanna, aged 38 years 4. Vadde Naganna, S/o Karrenna, aged 6b years (died per LR's-A- 141o24) 5. Vadde Narsimhulu, S/o Karrenna, age! 40 years 6. Vadde Siddaiah, S/o Karrenna, aged 43 years 7. Jamela Bee, Wo M.A. Satar, aged 71 years 8. Jubeda Bee, Wo Abdul Khadar, aged 73 years All are Agriculturists Rl/o Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. ...APPELLANTS/CLAIMANTS 9- B.Raju Sio. Late Narayana, Aged 30 years 10.V.Jaya Laxmi Dio. Late Narayana, Aged 34 years 11. B.Haribabu S/o. Late Narayana, Aged 36 years 12.Boya Venkate:sh S/o. Late Naraytana, Aged 30 years '13. B.Jayamma VV/o. Late Narayana, Aged 53 years 14. Edamma Wo. Late V.Naganna, Age 70 years '15. M.Narsamma D/o. Late V.Naganna, Aged 50 years ' 16.M.Laxmi Dio. Late V.Naganna, Aged 46 years

17.M.Narasamm,r Dio. Late V.naganna, Aged 44 years 'lB.M.Nagaveni D,io. Late V.Naganna, Aged 40 years l9.M.Narsimhulu S/o. Late V.Naganna, Aged 39 years 20. M.Karna S/o. -ate V.Naganna, Aged 38 years 21. M.Shekar S/o Late V.Naganna, Aged 36 years 22. M Saraswati VVio. Late M.Anjaneyulu, Aged 37 years 23.M.Narsimhulu S/o. Late M Anjaneyulu, Aged 17 years 24.M.Renuka D/o. Late M.Anjaneyulu, Aged 13 years 25. Mohammed Kraleemullah S/o. Late Mohammed Abdul Sattar, Aged 58 years Appellant No's,.9 to 25 are Occ. Agriculture, R/o, Gadwal proper Jogulamba Gadwal District. Appellant No's.9 to 25 are brought on record as LR's of deceased Appellant No's.1, 4 & 7 ,as per Court Order dated 15.04.2025, vide lA.No's.3, 6 & 9 of 2024 in LAAS. \o. 1073 oI 2011 ...Appellant No's.9 to 25 AND The Revenue, Divisional Officer, Land Acquisition Officer, Gadwal Mahabubnagar District. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(L,AASMP. NO: 1007 OF 2013) Petition under Order 41 Rule 27 of Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statecl in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to file the certified copy of Judgment in OP No. 37 ot 1997, on the file of Senior Civil Judge, awarded dated

13.12.2007 in LAAS No 1073 of 2011 and received the same Addl. Evedence i and mark as Exbt. lA NO: 12 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the copy of Judgment in O.P.No. 36 of 2012 and batch Dt. 03.09.20'15 against LAAS No.353 of 2016 and batch daled 16.03.2022 as additional material papers. Counsel for the Appellants 2, 3, 5 & 6: Sri S. Venkateshwar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: GP for Appeais LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL NO: 1CS OF 2012 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Lan( Acquisition Act against the'Common Order and Decree dated 02-07-2OOg in O.P.No. 48 and 57 of 2008(Award No. 6 of 2OO7 dt. O4-OB-2OO7) on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal. Between:

1. G.Savaranna, S/o. Laxmanna, 68 yeap, Agriculture R/o. H.No. 16-16, MlG, HB Colony, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Di$trict.

2. Gudikadi Sree Ramulu, S/o. Eadanna, 51 years, Agriculture R/o. H.No.4-1- 22, Chiftari Veedhi, Gadwal, Mahabubdagar District.

3. Manjoor Ahmed, S/o. Md.Ghouse, 58 years, Agriculture R/o. H.No. 6-3-5512, Momin Mohalla, Gadwal, Mahabubnag$r District.

4. Smt. Gattu Padmavathamma, Wo. G.Venkat Setty, 63 years, R/o. Rajaveedhi, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Dfstrict.(Died per LR's-A-17 to 24)

5. Smt. Gattu lndira, Wo. G.Suresh, 47 years, R/o. Rajaveedhi, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.

6. Smt. Gattu Himaja, Wo. G.Eswaraiah, 37 years, Rio. Rajaveedhi, Gadwal, , HfftX[lT:il;l": 8. Smt.L.Umadevi, Wo. L.Ram Mohan, $3 years, R/o. Krishna Road, Gadwal, Babu, 34 years, R/o Rajaveedni, cao*ar, Mahabubnagar District. ^"""d Mahabubnagar District.

9. G.Satayanarayan, S/o- G.Raghavaiah; 40 years, R/o. Near Chennakeshava Swamy Temple, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.

10. B.Madhavaiah, S/o. B.Chinna Mallaial, 47 yearc, R/o. LIG -192, HB Cotony, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.

11. K. Laxminarar;imhulu, S/o. K.Hanumanthu, 38 years, R/o. Ramnagar, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.(Died per LR's-A-'14 to 16) 12- Md.Salam, S;/o. Md.Rasool Miya, 49 years,Rio. Yerramantigeri, Gadwal, Mahabubnag ar District.

13.D.Chand, S/o.D.Shaik Sha Vali, 47 yearc, R:/o. Near Fish Market, Gadwal, Mahabubnagiar District. ...APPELLANTS/CLAIMANTS

14. K.Anjanamm:r Wo. K. Laxminarsimhulu @ Kurva Lakshminarsimhulu, Aged 48 years 1 5. K.Chandra P "asad S/o. K, Laxminarsimhulu @ Kurva Lakshminarsimhulu, Aged 28 yearr;

16. K.Mounika Dio. K. Laxminarsrmhulu @ Kurva Lakshminarsimhulu, Aged 27

17. Enuguru Umamaheswari Dio. G. Venkat Setty, Age 63 years 18.Gattu Suresh S/o. G.Venkat Sefty, Aged 62 years 19. Gattu Subrahrnanyam S/o. G. Venkat Setty, Aged 62 years 20.G.Sailaja D/o. G. Venkat Setty, Aged 59 years 21.Gattu Eswaraiah S/o. G Venkat Setty. Aged 58 years 22. G.Anand Babu S/o. G.Venkat Setty, Aged 54 years 23. Tallam Lakshrri Prasanna D/o. G.Venkat Setty, Aged 50 years 24.R.Rajeswari D/o. G.Venkat Setty, Aged 46 years 4ppellant No's. '14 to 24 arc Occ: Agriculture R/o Gadwal Proper Jogulamba Gadwal District. Appellant No's. 14 lo 24 arc brought on record as LR's of deceased Appellant No's. 11, 4 as per Court Order dated '15.04.2025, vide lA.No's.3 &6 of 2024 in LAAS.No 133 of 2011 ...APPELLANTS No'S.14 to 24 AND The Revenuer Divisional Officer, Mahabubnagar District. Land Acquisition Officer, Gadwal, ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT lA NO: 8 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the copy of ,Judgment in OP No. 30 of 2012 and batch dt. 03/09/2015 'against LAAS No. 35,1 of 2016 and batch dated 16/03/2022 as additionat materiat papers lA NO: 9 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC prayf ng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to pay the deficit court fee of Rs. 37,1261- in LAAS No. 133 of 2012 Counsel for the Appellants 1 to 3, 5 to 10 and 12, 13 : Sri $. Venkateshwar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals The Court delivered the following COMMON JUDGMENT: 1 AKSI & ETD,] LAAS 1072 & batch HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LA.rIS.Nos.1O72 , LO73 of 2OlI. and 133 of2012 COMMON JUDGMENT: lper t lon,ble Si .tustice Abtlinand Kllmar StLctL, i) When these matters are taken up for heziring, learned counsel app,:aring for the appellants had conten(led that the Land Acquisition Cfficer has acquired the lands of the appellants, in pursuance cf notification issued under Section a(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, for thc purpose of construction of new Broad Gauge Railwrly Line from Gadwal to Raichur and irfter due enquiry, the Land Acrluisition Officer has passed an award on O4.OS.2OOZ and awarded compensation of Rs.17,OOO/- per a(.rc. Not satished with the conrpensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, the appellants have sought reference under Secticn 1g of the Land Acquisition Act [or enhancemcnL ol compensation and the references r,ve re numbered as O.p.Nos.3g, 4g and 57 of 200g. The reference Co rrt u,as pleased to cnhance the r:ompensation to Rs.146/- per square yard for all the lands acquirec.

2. Learnec counscl for the appellants had further contended that in respect of other lands covered under the very same acquisition, tt.c reference Court has enhance d the ,.:ompensation to 2 AKSJ & ETD,J LAAS 1072 & batch Rs.354/- per square yard in O.P.Nos.2g, 30 and 3l of 2Ol2 uide common order dated 03.09.2015 and aggrieved by the same, the respondents therein have preferred 4Ppeals before this Court i.e. LAAS Nos.353, 354 and 355 of 2016, and the Division Bench of this Court was pleased to dismiss the appeals preferred by the respondents therein uide common judgment daLed 16.03.2022, whereby the enhancement of comperisation made by the reference Court to Rs.354/- per square yard wqs conhrmed.

3. Learned counsel for the appeflants had further contended that, admittedly, in the instant casg, the lands of the appellants were also acquired for the very same purpose pursuant to the very same notiflcation, but the reference Court has enhanced the compensation only to Rs. 146/- p". iq,.,u.. yard, and as such the appellants have preferred the presedt appeals seeking to enhance the compensation to Rs.250/- per sqpare yard.

4. Learned counsel for the appQllants had further contended that the appellants have filed amen$ment applications in all these three appeals seeking enhancement of compensation from Rs.250/- to Rs.354/- per square yard. Learned counsel further contended that, in case, the compenLation is enhanced to Rs.354/- per square yard, the appellants wQuld pay the defrcit Court fee' Therefore, foltowing the order, datgd 16.03.2022, passed by the 3 AKSI & ETD,J I-AAS 1072 & batch Division Bent:h of this Court in LAAS Nos.353, 3S4 and 355 of 20 16, the pre,;ent appeals may be disposed of.

5. Learnec Government Pleader did not dispute the said facts

6. This Cor-rrt, having considered the submissior-rs made by the learned counsel for the parties, is of the consider,:d view that the reference Cotrrt erred in not enhancing the compensation to \ \ Rs.354/- per s;quare yard, more so, when the same refercnce Court has cnhanced the compensation to Rs.354/- per square yard in I I respect of the lands covered in O.P.Nos.29, 30 and 3l of 2012 uid.e common order dated 03.09.2015. Therefore, the reference Court ought to have cnhanced the compensation to Rs.3r4/- per square yard in respecl of the subject lands also. Since the reference Court has enhanced the compensation to Rs.354/- per sqLlare yard in respect of the lands covered under the very same acquisition subsequent to filing of the subject O.ps., the pres,:nt appeals are liable to be d isposed of by enhancing the comltensation from Rs.146/- per square yard, as awarded by the relcrence Court, to that of Rs.354/- per square yard.

7. Accordinl4ly, the present appeals are disposcd of by enhancing the compensation from Rs.146/- per :jquare yard to Rs.354/- per squarc yard, following the common orcler dated

03.09.2015 pas;sed in O.P.Nos.29, 30 and 3l of 2012. which was 4 AKSJ & ETD,J LAAs_1072 & barch confirmed by the Division Bench of this Court. However. it is made clear that the appellants shall pay the deficit Court fee on the enhanced compensation amount. N6 costs. Miscellaneous pctitions, if anyi pending shall stand closed. //rRUE coCy/ ! D/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER l To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal.(with rgcords, if any) 2. One CC to Sri S. Venkateshwar Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl 3. Two CCs to GP for Appeals, High $ourt for the State of Telangana at 4. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] VFVgh HIGH COURT DATED: 1510412025 .-_-: i; r€' Hi () 2 5 lu n u 2[5 COMMON JU DGMENT+DEGREE LAAS.No. 107 2, 107 3 ot 201 1 And 133 of 2tt12 * ,iStltiC! -.r? )-.. .A DISPOSING OIF THESE APPEALS P( a tN THE HIGH couRT FoR THE Srere or TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HoNoURABLE sRr JUSTtcE AeHrNeHo KUMAR sHAVtLt AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTI TIRUMALA DEVI EADA JE LAAS NO:1072OF 2011 Between: '1 . G. Satyanarayana Reddy, S/o Pulla RefldyAgriculturist 2. Narayana, S/o Papanna, Aged 43 years Died per LR's-A-1 7 to 21 3. Saibaba, S/o Papanna, Aged 38 years 4. Ramulu, S/o Papanna, Aged.38 years 5. Vadde Naganna, S/o Karrenna, Aged 6p years (died per LR's-A-22 to 32) 6. Vadde Narsimhulu, S/o Kanenna, RgeJ +0 years 7. Vadde Siddaiah, S/o Karrenna, Aged 4g years 8. Malim Mohd. Khadeer, S/o Malim tvlohJ. Osman, 44 years 9. Malim Mohd Basheer, S/o Malim Mohd. Osman, 41 years 10. Malim Mohd. Shabeer, S/o Malim Mohd. Osman, 38 years 'l 'l . Malim Mohd. Khadeer, S/o Malim Mohd. Osman, 50 years 12.Malim Mohd. Basheer, S/o Malim lVlohd. Osman,41 years 13. Malim Mohd. Shabbeer, S/o Malim Mohd. Osman, 38 years 14.Malim Mohd. Khadeer, S/o Malim Mohd. Osman,50 years 15. Malim Mohd. Basheer, S/o Malim Mohd. Osman, 41 years l6.lVlalim Mohd. Shabbeer, S/o Malim Motld. Osman, 38 years All are Agriculturist Rlio Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. ...APPELLANTS/CLAIMANTS 2 to 17

17.B.Raju S/o. Late Narayana, Aged 34 yQars 18. V.Jaya Laxmi D/o. Late Narayana, Aged 36 years 19. B.Haribabu S/o. Late Narayana, Aged Q6 years 20.Boya Venkatesh Sio. Late Naraytana, Aged 39 years 21 . B.Jayamma W/o. Late Narayana, Aged 34 years 22.Edamma Wo. Late V.Naganna, Age 70 years 23. M.Narsamma D/o. Late V.Naganna, Agpd 50 Vears

24.M.Laxmi D/o. Late V.Naganna, Aged 46 years 25. M.Narasamm a D/o. Late V.naganna, Aged 44 yea-s 26. M.Nagaveni Erlo. Late V.Naganna, Aged 40 years 27. M.Narsimhulu S/o. Late V.Naganna, Aged 39 years 28.M.Karna S/o. Late V.Naganna, Aged 38 years 29. M.Shekar S/o Late V.Naganna, Aged 36 years 30. M.saraswati VV/o. Late M.Anjaneyulu, Aged 37 years 31 . M.Narsimhulu S/o. Late M.Anjaneyulu, Aged 17 years 32.M.Renuka D/c. Late M.Anianeyulu, Aged 13 years (Aopellant No's.31 & 32 are minors rep. by their natural mother [\r'l.Saraswati, A6i6iellant No :t0) Appellant No's.17 to 32 are brought on record r. r;:::::::::l;ffi No;s. 2 & 5 pe'r Court Order dated 15.04.2025, vide lA.No's.3 & 6 ol 2024 in LAAS.No 1072: ol 2011. AND 1 . The Revenur> Divisional Officer, Land Acquisition Officer, Gadwal, Mahaboobnag ar District. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

2. Mandla Sreedhar, S/o Pedda Eadanna Rl/o Gadwal, aged 55 years, FVo Gadwal, Maha :oobnagar District. [Respondent No. 2 is not necessary party to this appeal] ...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT No. 1 Appeal filed urtder Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Common Order and Decree dated 02-07-2009 in O.P.No. 48 and 57 of 2008(Award No. 6 of 2007 dt. 04-08-2007) :n the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal. This Appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the materia papers in the MVOP and upon hearing th€' arguments of Sri S Venkateshwar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and of GP fcr Appeals for the Respondent No. 1. This Court doth Orde,r and Decree as follows:

1. That the LAAS No. '1072 of 201 1 be and hereby is disposed of by enhancing the compensati,rn from Rs. 1461 per square yard to Rs. :1541-pq square yard; & -7,/ To, VH

2. Thal the claimants are entitled to all statutory benefits as per the amended act; and

3. That there shall be no order as to costt in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD/. K. SRINIVASA RAO OINT REGISTRAR I I CTION OFFICER 'l . The Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal 2. fwo CD Copies 1,yry HIGH COURI' DATED: 1510,112025 DECREE LAAS.No.107',2 of 2011 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL h I B ,,( \ \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR ]THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYqERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITIO N FIRST APPEAL NO: 107 3 0F 2011 Between: 1 2 J 4 5 6

7. 8 Narayana, S/o Papanna, Aged 43 years (Died per LR,s_A-9 to 13) Saibaba, S/o Papanna, aged 3g years Ramulu, S/o Papanna, aged 38 yea Vadde Naganna, S/o Karrenna, age Vadde Narsimhulu, Sio Kirrenna, a Vadde Siddaiah, S/o Karrenna, ager Jamela Bee, W/o M.A. Satar, aged i Jubeda Bee, W/o Abdul Khadar, agt ped 40 Vears 43 Vears [ f1 ,sd 73 years rS 63 Vears (died per LR's-A- 14 to 241 All are Agricutturists R/o Gadwal, Mf habubnagar District. ...APPELLANTS/CLAIMANTS

9. B.Raju Sio. Late Narayana, Aged 30 years 10. V.Jaya Laxmi Dio. Late Narayana, Aged 34 years 11. B.Haribabu S/o. Late Narayana, Aged 36.years 12.Boya Venkatesh S/o. Late Naraytana, Aged 30 years 13.B.Jayamma W/o. Late Narayana, Aged 53 years '14. Edamma W/o. Late V.Naganna, Age 70 years 15. M.Narsamma D/o. Late V.Naganna, Aged 50 years '16.M.Laxmi Dio Late V.Naganna, Aged 46 years 17. M.Narasamma D/o. Late V.naganna, Aged 44 years 18. M.Nagaveni Dio. Late V.Naganna, Aged 40 years l9.M.Narsimhulu S/o. Late V.Naganna, 20. M.Karna S/o. Late V.Naganna, Aged 38 years 21. M.Shekar S/o. Late V.Naganna, Age 36 years 22. lvl.Saraswati W/o. Late M.Anjaneyulu Aged 37 years 23. M.Narsimhulu S/o. Late M.Anjaneyul , Aged 17 years {Aged 39 years

24. M.Renuka D/o. Late M.Anjaneyulu, Aged 13 years 25. Mohammed KeLleemullah S/o. Late [Vlohammed Abdul Sattar, Aged 58 years Appellant No's 9 to 25 are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o, Gadwal proper Jogulamba Gadwal Districl . Appellant No's I to 25 are brought on record as LR's of deceased Appellant No's.1, 4 & 7 as per Court Order dated 15.04.2025, vide lA,No's.3, 6 & 9 of 2024 in LAAS.lrlo. '1073 of 2011 . ...Appellant No's.9 to 25 AND The Revenue: Divisional Officer, Land Acquisition Officer, Gadwal Mahabubnagar District. ..RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Appeal filed urrder Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Common Order and Decree daied O2-O7-2009.in O.P.No. 39 of 2008(Award No. 5 of 2007 dt. 04-08-2007) on the fil,-. of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal. This Appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the MVOP and upon hearing thr: arguments of Sri S Venkateshwar Reddy, Advocate for the appellants 2,3,5 & 6 and of GP for Appeal for the Respondent. This Court doth Ord,rr and Decree as follows:

1. That the LAAS No. '1073 of 201 1 be and hereby is disposed of by enhancing the compensat on from Rs. 146/- per square yard to Rs. 354^per square yard; 2. That the Clairrants are entitled to all statutory benefits as per the amended act; and

3. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal 2. Two CD Copier; SD/. K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER N HIGH COUR]- DATED: 1510'+12025 DECREE LAAS.No. 10it3 o12011 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEEN H DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE h PREsErlr THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTI E TIRUMALA DEVI EADA j LAND AC UISITION FIRST A PEAL NO: 133 OF 2012 Between: 1 . G.Savaranna, S/o. Laxmanna, 68 years, Agriculture Rl/o. H.No. 16-16, MlG, HB Colony, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.

2. Gudikadi Sree Ramulu, S/o. Eadanna, 51 years, Agriculture Fl/o. H.No.4-1- 22, Chillari Veed hi, Gadwal, Itlahabubnhqai District. -

3. ManjoorAhmgd, S/o. Md.Ghouse, Sa jears, Agricutture Rl/o. H.No. 6-3-SSt2, Momin Mohalla, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Distric[.

4. Smt. Gattu Padmavathamma, W/o. G.Venkat Setty, 63 years, R/o. Rajaveedhi, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Dibtrict.(Died per LRs-A-17 to 24) 5. Smt. Gattu lndira, Wo. G.Suresh, 47 yea$, Rl/o. Rajaveedhi, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. Mahabubnagar District.

6. Smt. Gattu Himaja, .Wo. G.Eswaraiafr] SZ years, Ryo. Rajaveedhi, Gadwal, 7. 9.attu Kalyani, Wo. G.Anand Babu, 34 years, Rt/o. Rajaveedhi, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. B. gmt.L.Umadevi, W/o. L.Ram Mohan, S]S y"ur., Ryo. Krishna Road, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.

9. G.Satayanarayan, S/o. G.Raghavaiah, 40 years, Rl/o. Near Chennakeshava Swamy Temple, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Diatrict.

10.B.Madhavaiah, S/o. B.Chinna Mallaiah,47 years, Fi/o. LIG -1g2,HBColony, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District_

11. KLaxminarasimhulu, S/o. K.Hanumantf u, 38 years, Rl/o. Ramnagar, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.(Died per LR's-4-14 to i 6)

12. Md.Salam, S/o. Md.Rasool IMiya, 49 years,R./o. yenamantigeri, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Dislrict.

13.D.Chand, S/o.D.Shaik Sha Vali,47 yeprs, Rl/o. Near Fish Market, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. '14. K.Anjanamma W/o. K.Laxminarsimhuh.f @ Kurva Lakshminarsimhulu, Aged 48 years '15. K.Chandra Prasad S/o. K Aged 28 years Laxminarsimhulu @ Kurva Lakshminarsimhulu, ...APPELLANTS/C LAI MANTS '16. K.Mounika Di,r K. Laxminarsimhulu @ Kurva Lakshminarsimhulu, Aged 27

17. Enuguru Umarraheswari Dio. G. Venkat Setty, Age 63 years 18. Gattu Suresh lS/o. G.Venkat Setty, Aged 62 yearc l9.Gattu Subrahnranyam S/o. G. Venkat Setty, Aged 62 years 20.G.Sailaja D/o. G. Venkat Setty, Aged 59 years 21.Gattu Eswaraiah S/o. G.Venkat Sefty. Aged 58 years 22.G.Anand Babu S/o. G.Venkat Setty, Aged 54 years 23. Tallam Lakshnri Prasanna D/o. G.Venkat Setty, Aged 5() years 24. R.Rajeswari Dro. G.Venkat Setty, Aged 46 years Appellant No's 14 to 24 are Occ: Agriculture Rl/o Gadvral proper Jogulamba Gadwal Districl. ...APPELLANTS No's.14 to 24 Appellant No's. 14 to 24 arc brought on record as LR,s .f deceased Appellant Nglr, t 1, 4 as per Court Order oa[eO is.Oa.iozi uo"jn No,s.3 & 6 of 2024 in LAAS.No. 133of 2011. AND The Revenue Divisional Mahabubnagar District. Officer, Land Acquisitiorr Officer, Gadwal, ...RESPONDE NTS/RESPONDENT Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the common order and Decree datr>d o2-o7-2oog in o.p.No. 48 and s7 of :2008(Award No. 6 of 2007 dt. 04-08-2007) on the fire of the court of the Senior civir J.rdge at Gadwar. This Appeal conring on for hearing and upon perusing thr: grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar ,apers in the MVop and upon hearing the arguments of sri s Venkateshwar Redcy, Advocate for the appellants 1 to 3, 5 to '0 and ,12, 13 and of Gp for Appeal for thc Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as followsl

1. That the LAAS No. 133 of 2012 be and is disposed of by enhancing ferebV the compensation from Rs. 146/- per squdre yard to Rs. 354/-per square yard, 2. That the Claimants are entitled to all statutory benefits as per the amended act; and

3. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD . K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal 2. Two CD Copies To VH HIGH COURT DATED: 15104t2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 13li of 2012 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL t4 g\DK \\ I