The High Court · 2025

Smt. VadluriHymavathi,, Wo. Kiran Kumar, Age. 33 Years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. lL. No. 2-8-12313, NearTX Hospital, Bharath Nagar, Uppal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District ...Respondents Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Cr.No. 1022 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda against the Petitioners/ Accused No. 1 to 6. !.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Cr. No. 1022 of .2O25 on the file of P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda against the Petitioner/Accused including the personal appearance of the Petitioners/Accused pending disposal of the criminal petition. l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 I.A NO: oF 2025 Between: Smt._Vadluri Hymavathi,, Wo. Kiran Kumar, Age. 33 Years, Occ. House Wife, $19, lL. .!o. 2-8-12313, Near TX Hospitat, Bharath Nagar, Uppat, Medchat- Malkajgiri District ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant ANO

3. 4 5 6 F^Oa1-qSuqgn,, S/o E. Yadagiri, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Employee, R/o 2-6- 92, Bharath Nagar, Uppal, MedchalMalkajgiri District -500039.' Eg_alaSu_nitha,, D/o. E. Yadagiri, Aged about 36 years, Occ. House wife, Ryo. 2-6 92, Bharath Nagar, Uppal, MedchalMalkajgiri-District -500039. Maminlalaxmi, , Wo lr4aminlaGajanand, Occ. Employee, Aged about 43 ygarp, Ry9 1-1-330l3lcl2l2l13, Giound Ftoor, Bapuji i{a!ar,'Chikkadpaily, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. Bodike _Vani Pabai,, Wo Bodikeswamy, Occ. Employee, Aged about 40 years, R/o _56_, _ Vanga Pally, Maddur, Vangepally, Warangal Telangana-506367. Dudapaka Om Praka:"h,, S/o DudapakaMallaiah, Occ. Business, Aged about X6. years, Occ 12-11-27111, Warasiguda, Sitaphalmandi, Hlderabad, Telangana - 500061. Dasari Bhagyalaxmi,, Wo DasariRamu, Aged about 48 years, Occ. House yifq,. R/_g 4-7612A, Annapurna Colony, Nacharam, Uppal, Mailapur, Ranga Reddy District. 'Vaitampatia, ' )

7. The Stale of. Telangana, , Reprggented by potice, Uppal Through public Prosecutor, High Court for State of Telangani At Hyderabad. Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/respondent No.2/de-facto complainant to compound the offence punishable under Section 318(4), 14, 127(2), 351(2) BNS & 3(1Xs), 3(2) (Va) SC, ST, POA Act, 201s in Crime No. 1O22t2o2S of Uppat Police Station, Medchal- Malkajgiri District on the basis of setflement arrived at between the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 6 and Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant. "/,/ l.A. NO: 4 0F 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to compromise the case with the respondents/petitioners/A1 to AG and the proceedings against the respondents/petitioners/A1 to A6 nnay be quashed in Crime No. 102212025 of Uppal Police Station, Medchal Malkajgiri District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Baglekar Akash Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER t THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 under Sectiqn 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in FIR No.1022 of 2025 on the file of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda District.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 as well as respondent No.1/de facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed seeking permission to compound the offences, to record the compromise and to quash the firoceedings in the said crime.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2o2s which disctose that she has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter \/ 2 ETD, J Crlp_l 1448_2025 \ into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders ddted 04.09.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and , submitted a report dated 11.09.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have wiltfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise. .r

6. tn view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2A25 are altowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is altowed and the proceedings in FIR No.1022 of 2025 on the file of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda District, registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings \ \r/ l -,/ 3 EI'D. J Crlp-l 1448_2025 A/c.No.S2188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:SB|N0020070, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,0.00/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the Statd of Telangana, Hyderabad, within a period of three (03) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/. P. PONNA KRISHNA ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Vt Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Uppal, LB Nagar

2. The station House officer, Uppal Police station, Rachakonda 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State ofrTelangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Baglekar Akash Kumar, Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two CD Copies ABK /SA Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Bagl6kar Akash Kumar, Counsel for the Petitioners as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 23.09.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 115231 of 2025 and Receipt No. 1683 dated 16-10-2025. YY t .l-5:.,Y i -bt I s t HIGH COURT DATED: 2310912025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2O2S ln/And CRLP.No.11448 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE t.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION "nsd) $a,' -,a"= il1<- S;;I t(. I,o ( -) I 19 IEC z{ffi t .gPrrTCPr- c * , € IN THE HIGH COIIRT TOR THE STATE AT: IIYDERABAD OFTELANGANA CRLP No. oF 2025 BETWEEN Smt. Vadluri Hymavathi, Wo. I(iran I(umar, Age. 33 Years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. IL. No. 2-8-1 2.313, Near TX Hospital, i Bharath Nagar, Uppal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. Petitioner/Respo ndent No. 2/ Defacto: C omplainant AND

1. EgalaSuman, S/o E. Yadagiri, Aged about 33 years, Occ : Employe e, Rl o 2 - 6 -9 2, Bhar ath Nugar, Upp al, MedchalMalkaj giri District -50003 9.

2.EgalaSunitha, Dio. E. Yadagiri, Aged about 36 years, Occ: House wife, FVo. 2-6 g2,Bharath Nagar, Uppal, a MedchalMalkaj giri District -50003 9.

3. Maminlalaxmi, Wo MaminlaGajanand, occ: Employee,4g.a about 43 years,R/o l-1-3 3ol3rc/zr2!/13, Ground Floor, Bapuji Nagar, Chikkadpally, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

4. Bodike Vani Babai, Wo BodikeSwamy, Occ: Ernployee, Aged about 40 years, R/o 56, Vanga pally, Maddur, Vangepal ly, Val I am p atla, Warangal, Telangan a_ 5 0 63 67 .

5. Dudapaka Om prakash, S/o DudapakaMallaiah, Occ: Business, Aged about 36 years, Occ: l2_ll_27\/t, warasiguda, sitapharmandi, Hyderabad, Telangana - 50006 I . 6' Dasari Bhagyalaxmi, wo DasariRamu, Aged about 4g years, occ: House wife, Rlo 4-76/24, Annapuma colony, Nacharam, uppar, Mallapur, Ranga Reddy District. rr. { ..Respondents/ Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 6

7. The State of Telangana, Represented by police, Uppal Through Public prosecutor, High court for state of Terangana At Hyderabad. ...Respondent/Respondent No. l* JOINT MEMO -joint It is submitted that the petitioner/respondent No. 2 herein filed the present Memo to compound the offences as against the Respondents/ Petitioners/Accused No. I to 6 as the matter is settled out of court amicably in view of the fact that the petitioner. For the reasons stated above, it is prayed that this Hon,ble court may be pleased to pennit the petitioner/respondent No. 2 herein to compound the offence with. the Respondents/ petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 6. herein by allowing the criminal Petition filed by the Petitioner and proceedings against them mav be quashed in crime No. I 022/2025 0f uppar ,"ir.J o]rr"r, Medchal Malkajgiri District, and pass such other order o. o*.., as this rtor,ut. court rnay deem fit and proper,in the circumstances of the case. Place: Hyderabad Dated: Counsel for the n.ffi-*tNo.2 C' L^a }{\ f't counset fbr?Efiiioner G) G c2-r^. e 9-'v^'\$a"^- GD Petitioners /AI to A6 D- Voh\_b-b" € G) .D D ?r "rt-.S\ t\ >59 V' ct'Icax De-facto Complainant ,