✦ High Court of India · 08 Jan 2025

Smt. Gurijala Kavyasree alias Nimmatoori Kavyasree v. 1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,747 words

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in suooort of the p"iition, ihli'gr, court may u" pr"rrJt" Direct the Respondent'r.ro-o to h;;;i;r'';""FrR agrinst the Un_officiar Respondent Nos.24 to 32, forthwith oi t"r.ing consideration of petitioner 'into ReDresentation daled 17-10-2024, by calling back the Respondent Nos 26 to 30 to india; Pending disposal of the main Writ Petition' IA NO:2OF 2O24 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit fiteo irr support of the peiition, tne Higt Court may be pleased. to bji""i tfrl Responrlent tttos.z, tz to 20 through prior permission of this 1o.1.91" Oacttne Cespondent Nos.26 to 30 to lndia to Cancel theirV;SA 6"rrt'OV bVtheconcernedauthorities,basedonRepresentationdatedl7-10-2o24i PLnding disposal of the main Writ Petition' ""ffi^t IA NO:3OF 2024 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the peiition, ine Hign Court may be pleased to bj;";i 6; iesponclent Nio T to impound the pas:Ports of Respondent Nos26..to -in prr"rrrt to the Represeniation dated 't 7-1.0-2 024 by calling back .the 5o il.pono"nt Nos.26 to 3o'to lndia and shall not leave the jurisdiction of. this Fi;;lbl" court without prior intimation; pending disposal of the main writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOLLU NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 6: SRI R' TAXMIKANTH REDDY' ASST. GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.9: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7 & 8, 10 to 22: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR' DY. SOLICITOR GENER,AL OF INDIA I I Gounsel for the Respondent No.23 to 32i ' - ' - The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2!M85 OF 2024 ORDER: (ORAL) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to declare the action of respondents No.2 to 7 in .not registering crime against respondents No.24 to 32 pursuant to her representation/complaint dated I i I l

17.10.2024, and to declare the inaction of respondent No.7 in irnpounding the passports of respondents No.26 to 30, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

2. Mr. R. Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, basing on the written instructions dated 3O.12.2024, submifted a that enqurry was conducted on the complaint dated 17 .10.2024 lodged by the petitioner which was received by respondent No.6 - the Station House Officer, Kazipet Police StatiorU on 22|10.2024. During the course of enqurry/ it was revealed that the matter pertains to matrimonial disputes, as suclL respondent No.6 suggested the parties to approach Women Police Station (WI5), Warangal or competent civil Court for redressal of her grievance. The petitioner, instead of approaching Wf,S, Warangal, approached this Court t'- ,1. r L A coJry of written instructions is served on the learned counsel for 3 2 the petition,:r. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4. petitioner to approach WI)S Warangal, and lodge a complaint and on receipt of the same, WI5 Warangal shall conduct enquiry/investigation in accordance with the law laid down in by the Hon ble supreme Court in Lalitha Kumari v. Government of U'P1' There shall be no order as to As a sec[uel thereto, miscellaneous apPlications' if any' pending in this wr.rt Pt:tition stand closed- //TRUE COPY// SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTAN(REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER '"-iut[r*ip##ll*';ii,'i,3ffi i+1ffi?lj'i]#aa' '!l"; i:LTl'ij"i""1,":r,":ll:lt*":',t"'*;;;;"warangar,reransana 4. The DePutY Commis '!i'"1[!.i!,fl,19*H?]?l,t[?J"-";J:rdq"Division'waransar Commissionerate, l ' ' AIR 2012 s(l 1515 \ o. fne Siation House Officer, Kazipet Police Station' Warangal' Warangal " oiJtri"ili"tunsana state -506003' 7. The Reqional Passport otfiJi'"5Ei'"oerabad' Hyderabad - 500003' 8. Union o-f lndia' Ministry;i'ffi"i";ff;il-tlortn-enix' New Delhi - 1't0001' i;:-,NewDerhi- "$:"s8tri?'3:B;:,ffi :oin1;lHgcoilectoriHaFrrJHs'r'f rr!13o,o",'"t*:,"FyJIAt,$I#S"Hil'ffi 'J:AiT,i30rf^"::'-::::*' .,, T33t J?"?:fri t#iffiw;t Extemar Affai rs' soto'e)l7ab south Brock' ,. +fry3"1[,:1vffie rrainistw or Home Affairs'N.DCC-ll Buildins' Jai sinsh '" A'""ral riL-"iJ'antar Mantar,'New Delhi-.110001, - - #iHtf, :'fi l*.ii"'#"x,Hxt";"1":HAxi,l,'a:":fl s'li'la';l;"'l3tli' ,,. +lgXl*Sgl,' it 3:go;0"".y New Derhi, s hantipath, chanakyapuri, N ew ,, ?frylilJi3ilcer, U.S. Embassy New Derhi, shantipath, chanakvapuri, New .' - ?frI*l?g'',t Generar, District, Nanakramguda 19.The Visa Officer, U.S' ( District. Nanakramgucla 20.The U.S. Consulate Ge ,, ifll."an'3?ffi31;:"3H - .'Floor. Hvderabad, Tela 22.The Chdirman, Nationa ;; T#'3llilf], l*ruUru"',: Ei1li&um'::r." n ro r wo men' 2 nd F roo r' B ud h a - - *, E r'r'xur"r An. t s"o 1'tv Sci"ito, e" nerar or r nd i a ), 7t 7?+ll833:SSEBnHslL'-5p11[t'dJ,':'ffi {l"i'#sar?J""'Y' B hava n. Ra n is u nj, r"lr,liEiHt; r?i]i"$'91," rg? F$|,"&L,; Effi E3 q touTl

28.Two CD CoPies BN $ I I HIGH COURT DATED:0810112025 CC TODAY k q c o 1i 6ST 0 g JIN ?0?5 I i: * o65;:';;;C'#' ORDER WP.No.29486 of 2024 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WTHOUT COSTS 01 6 I I t f I l l I I l I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments