The High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
AND 1. The Revenue Drvisional oflicer, Nagarkurnool,. [vlahaboobnagar District' ; +ffi I;;;ifi "conl,i.iion".. 3. Government of retangaria,"i"u*'q E"dowments' Departrfient' Rep by its " 4 sri Anianeva swamy r"ripj", r,jriJtikunta Village, Lingala Mandal. Friniipit Secretary, S-ecretariat' Hyderabad' .. Nagari<urn-ool District, Rep by its Presloent' (R4 is impleaded as per Court Order dt: 03 09 2025 in lA No 2/2025) of Endiwments' trilahaboobnasar' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of Ihe Constitutlon of lndia praying that in the circumstances -stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction' more particularly a writ in the nature of WritofluANDAt\,4usdeclaringtheorderofthe'lstrespondenti'e'Revenue DivisionalOfficer,NagarkurnoolpassedinCC'Nol/'1503t2014'dated01-07-2014 directing the maintenance of status quo relating to the land admeasuring an extent of Acs.'12-35 guntas in Sy No 165 at Komatikunta Village' Lingal Mandal' -/ Mahaboobnaqar District. as bad, illegal, arbitrary, opposed to law, one without .lurisdiction and in violatron of principles of natural justice. l.A. NO:1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO:27281 oF 20141 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High coud may be preased to susPEND the order of the 1st respondent i.e., the Revenue Divisionar officer, Nagarkurnoor passed in c.c-No.1/1 503 /2014, dated 01-o7-2014, so as to enabre the petitioners to be in possession of the rand admeasurrng an extent of Acs. 12- 35 guntas in Sy No.165 at Komatikunta virage, Lingar lvrandar, A,4ahaboobnagar District, pending disposal of the main Writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Between: R:A?'-ilHI3,T&H, HSI';; i:r:Jf;gt1 virr"o", Linsara A,4andar, P R o P o s E D il grt"tit^iBl [Y RESPoNDENT No.4 AND
1. Tappa Ramuru. s/o rate Tappa pedda Bara Kistaiah. aged about 55 vears. Pedda Laxmaiah, afftri""i;;p; cnii,if'6rr, Kistaiah, asedrbout oo ' IslL, t chinna Laxmaiah, s/o late Tappa chinna Bata Kislaiah, aged about 54 ISfi.: 4. Tappa Balapeeru. s/o tate fspps Chinna Bala Kistaiah. aged about 48 vears. 5. Tappa Swamv. s/o tare Tappi bninna eit, i;si"i"fi, ,g"o about 30 veirs o. rappa Venkaiaiah s/" ratfi;pp; i;;;;'jriJilo"r,40 years, 7. Tappa Chinnaiah. s/o rare_Tapa'Hr.;;;,'Ag;"d";#i,r 30 years. S Tappa Ramutu. s/o tate Tapp'a Hrssuin. ngBil6lii za y"urr, (all are Occ Aqriculture lt/ahaboobnaqar District). r/o Komatikunta Village of Lingal Mandal, ...PETITIONERS
9. The Revenue Divisionat Officer Nagarkurnool, lvlahaboobnagar District. 1 0. The Assistant Commis.sioner or rno"olrynienirl'v"firoooonuour. 11. Government of Telanoana. ner"nu" gnj'o*r""i.l.o"prrtment. Principat Secretary, Sicreiariat, Ht;;6;;. """'"' , Rep.by its Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to ...RESPONDENTS ,J -/ vacate the interim orders passed in l A No l of 2025 (WPtrIP No 27281 of 2014) in W.P.No. 21751 o12014 dated 2O-OB-2025 pass such other order or orders lA NO: 3 oF 2025 Between: The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments' IVlahaboobnagar' AND ...PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT R2 r3lJe 1 r a p pa B, r l, r,,, s /9 9f- i"Ti;#'|1.ffi f 3l i,' Ri,l,' 3fl 15 330'3'oLL u o 2. f aPPa Pedda Laxmatan, 3. Tappa Chinna Laxmaran, s/o late Tappa Chinna Bala Kistaiah' aged about 54 *. l??li; Balapeeru, s/o lale Tappa Chinna Bala Kistaiah aoed about 48 vears' s. Taopa Swamy. .,o '"" ':"piI"c"ninn' 6. ir55" VJitririrn slo radTippa Hussain' ased,about 40 vears' ;. +;ffi; c[innjiar,, slo taGTapL Hussain'.Aged about 30 vears' 6. il[EI X!'ti..,ill.i"lit" i'pp'' Hussain Aged about 2svears' ail' kitt'iah age{about 30 years (all are Occ Agriculture, il'la ha boo bna g a r District)' r/o Komatikunta Village of Lingal lvlandal' ...RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS
9. The Revenue Divisional Officer' Nagarkurnool io. c"""i"r"""t oiTulangana' Revenue Endowm ' " F;;;ip;i S"cretary, S-ecretariat' Hvderabad . tvlahaboobnagar District' ents, Department, ReP.bY its t ...RespottDEt'trsi RESPdNDENTS R1 & R3 (are not necessary Farties to Petition) PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to vacate the lnterim order dl' 20 08'2O14in W'P No 27151 of 2O14 and dismiss the Writ Petition in the interest of Justice' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M'VIDYASAGAR -- ;;;;;i il;;;i il;;;i The Court made the following: ORDER for the Respondent Nos'1 & 3: GP FoR REVENUE for the Respondent No'2: GP FoR ENDowMENTS ior the Respondent No'4: SRI M'LAXMAN RAo THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.2175 I of 2OL4 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Government pleader for Endowments and learned Senior Counsel for the unofficial respondents arid perused the material on record.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that this r,vrit petition is filed by the petitioners questioning the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Oflicer (RDO), Nagarkurnooi in C.C.No.I/ 1503/2O14, dated OI.O7.2Ol4. li, the said order, the RDO directed to maintain status-quo over the subject land till disposal of W.p.No. lS22S of 2013. Thereafter, W.p.No. lS22S of 2013 was disposed of by this Court on 12.12.2O7g. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners ald learned Senior Counsei for the unofhcial respondents submit that there is a, oRC pending between the parties to a, extent of I I j I i i 2 sx'J W.P.No.z7751 ol 2074 Ac.12.35 guntas rn Sy.No.165 of Komatikunta Village' LingalMandal, Nagarkurnool District and requested to pass apProPriate orders' In view of the submission made by the both sides' 4. without going into merits of the case' the writ petition is ciosed by directing both the parties to maintain status-quo existing as on today, till d'isposal of the ORC pending before theRevenueDivisionaloffrcer,Nagarkurnoolforthesuit schedule property' There sha1l be no order as to costs' S. As a sequel, the misceilaneous petitions pending' if any, shall stand closed' SD/-P. [RiY=[ts?HXt ,TRUE COPY// CTTON OFFICER ?ffi 33 JiiSiY-JPXiicsOE fi i,Y: s1's J?iY*r' tate of Telangana' at the State of Telangana' *t?tSf-mH"')ll:l?";:TJ' To
1. 2 3 4 5 PSK GJP HIGH COURT DATED:0310912025 ORDER WP.No.21751 of 2014 - - :-l:=:=1\\ ' -,.. IflE $;;..-'""- ^ i, t, ',..(_\ -,:,. ; :i'._:r:) ,10 sEP 20?5 ,t ll;r., 1-C t' '-', CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS