The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased lo issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in interfeing with the personal life and liberty of Petitioner ln respect path way to the agricuture land of petitioners which is there from the respondent No-S and 6 in survey No. 132 survey Number to survey No-133 since from more than 70 years but the Respondents No-5 and 6 who are having land in survey No-132 have illegally encroached the path way of the petitionefs and restraining them to go their land, that the path way was allotted to the petitioners land by the land lords of the neighboring lands but the Respondents No-5 and 6 illegallY, occupied the path way and confined the petitioner to do their agriculture worlts, and closing the path way illegally, for this illegal act the respondent No-3 (i.e Sl of cherial) giving helping hand to the respondent No-s and 6 even without considering the report issued by the respondent No-4, which is illegal and contrary to law and infringement of Fundamenlal Rights of the Petitioners as guaranteed under Article 14 aad 19,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent No.3 and 4 to restore the pathway of Petitioners path way to the agriculture land of petitioners which is there from the respondent No-S & 6 in survey No. 132 survey Number to survey No-133 since from more than 70 years, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. PAGILLA JAYANTHI Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to3: SRI M. SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME Gounsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5&6:- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOUITABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26411 of 2025 OITDER: I-leard learned counscl for the petitioners anc-l Sri.M.Srinivas, lcarned Assistant Covcrnment ['k'ader for I'lome appearing for respondent Nos.l to 3 With their consent, this n rit petition is bcing taken up for disposal at the arlmission sta ge itsclf.

2. 'fhis r,t,rit petition has been filetl secking the following prayer:- "to dctltrc tltc rrt'titttt c,[ tlt llespottderrl No 3 in interfering uitlt llrc persont lrfi' trul ltbtrty ttl Ptliliotvr ltt respect potlt uay to tltc agriLt turc Lmd of yehtioners u,lut.h Ls tlrrt' .liom tlu respottdtttt No.5 tntLl 6 itL sun'ty No,132 to stlnvy No. 133 sirie fron more tlnn 70 V(ors b!Lt tlu, Rasyondents No.5 arr,1 b u,lut itre haping latul in surpey No.'132 lrrn't, illcgLtlly cncroaclud tltr: path wctll of tlrc petitioner's and restr'ritting tltcnt to go tlu,rr lanrl tlnt the path ruay z()as allotted to thc patitiLnrrs lnnd hy ilu lnnd lortls o.!' tlr netghhoring lurds but llu' Respo!rl.nls No.5 ririrl 6 illegnLly ttt'ttrprttl tlrc pnth uuttl atrd con.fitu'l llu: ]tt'lttront'r lLt rio llrcrr tgrrcrrllrtrr u,orks, urtrl tiosing llu pallt k,ttU tllegt ly .for lltis illrgrrl n.! tlu' t'1,\pottilu rl No.3 (i.r, SI o.f clrcrirrl) giritrg Irlpittg lurrul lo llu rcspondntt No.5 tu'rd 6 ercn uitltout rottsidcring Llrc report iss!r',1 bV LlLt rcspottdcnt No.4 ulrich is iLLegal anLl contrary to lao nnd in.lringct trt'rtl of FtuttlnnL,ntnl Rights of the Petitioners ns grtarnttlet'd trrttlcr Artttle 74 rtnrl 1r9, 21 nnd j00A of the Constittttion oJ-ltt,li,,."

3. llrief facts statetl in this rr,rit pc.tition are that petitioners claims to be tlre owners and posscssors of lan.l atlmcasuring 1600 guntas in Sy.No.133/B/ t, situated at Ktrdavcrgu Village, Cherial Manclal, Siddipct Dis;trict, havirrg accluirctl thc samt. tlrroulih sale deecl bearir-rg clocurnt'nl No.277 of 1990 datecl 30.04.1990. 'l'hereaitcr, the petitioners wert-. cultivating thc subicct land. It is f urther statctl that thc lands in Sy.Nos.132 anri 133 beionlls to one familV and the path \^,aV ior the potitioners' land is fr6nr the \ l I lancl in Sr,.No.133. The case oI tl',t: pctiticrncrs is that resporlderlt Nos.5 and 6 arr havinp, lantl in Sy.No.132 antl thev havr: illcgal[y cncroached the path r,r,ay and arc resh'aining the petitiorrers b approach their lands. Further case of the pctiti(rlrcrs is that the rcsprortdcr.:t No.3 is rrrterfcrrng in the above issue and is lrarassir.rg thc petitioners. Aggrieverl bv the saure, this writ pctition is filed \ -4. [,earncd Assistanl (]overnment [''tcatler [or Home appearing for rcspcrnrlent Nos.l t() 3 plact:d orr record irlstructions issrrccl bv Sulr-lnspector oI Policc, Cl-rel-ial I)olice Station. Siddipel [)istricl, \'Vhercin ii is statccl that tcsi.or'tLleut N0.(r rnat{c ;r conrplaint on I l.l)7.2{)25, stating that the petitioners arc trr..sl.rassirr-.; thcir larrcl .rnrl aLc- tl a r.tr.r p, ir-rg tlrt' bcruudarics ancl inspitc of IudS,rle:rt a:rtl Dtx:ree in OS.n"o.575 r.f 2011, the pctitit'ners arc rcst--ailring him l() ('r'llu lris iarrd arrrl rt.cirrestr:rl t() t:)ke .lction aSairlst pctitioners. On such complaint, (lD errt't, w'as madc ar.rd rlurini,. thc corrLst: of tlv: enquirr', the rcsproncierr[ Nlr.3 r,isited th,., lancls in 9r'.No.1.12 antl 133 .rnrl it was rt,t,ealed that thc clis;r111q, lrttwecn p.1rtiL.s is ra,,ith respcct to lancl boundary and thc sarnc is civil dispute. once, or-r 1ti.07.2()25, r(,sponclcnt No.6 complaint w,as closotl as '(-ivil in Natu|c' anc{ th.: 1.r,1rtisli 11,g1r-. clirectcri to approach c()rlrpchrrt ( ivil Court for reclressal

5. I{ecorriing tht'subn.rissiorrs rx.rLlc []\ Ic.rrnt-rl corrr.tscl a;rPga1in,, on oither sir'lc, r,,'ilhrrui i:rprr'ssirr. anr oPiirrrrn crn ilrr: nrt.iits r,i the c.ise anri sincc. tLv: lcsl-ro1q1li.;11 Nrr.(, r'r'rrnplaint datcd I2.()z'.2()25 registercd agaitrst the pctitioners is ciosotl on 18.02'.2(125, tftis (-otrrt c]c<:rns it appropriate to disposc of thc ryrit r/ fretition granting libertv to pctitioners to seek appropriate ren'red1, as available l under Iaw, if otherwisc aggrieved

6. Accordinglv, thrs rvrit petition disposecl of. M iscellant'orrs applications, if an1' pendin11, shall star.rrl clrrsed. i.,\o olLlcr as to costs, I To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSI TANT REGISTRAR N OFFICER S I \J

1. The Principal Secretary to Home Department, TS Secretariate, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Siddipet Commissionerate at Siddipet. 3. The Station House Officer, cherial, Cherial police station. 4. The Mandal Revenue Officer, cherial, MRO office cherial. 5. One CC to Ms. PAGILLA JAYANTHI, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana at 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CD Copies BM rJt HIGH COURT DATED:0310912025 ORDER (J 2 I JAt{ 2ti26 WP.No.26411 of 2025 .+ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ltT/ -Jf" g\\,t I