High Court · 2025

Sri Pabba Ashok, S/o Shankaraiah, Aged about 51 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Doultabad Village and Mandal, Siddipet District, Telangana State ..PETITIOT.TER AND '1. The State of Telangana, Rep by lts Principal Secretary Department of Home Dr B R Ambedkar Bhavan Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad

2. The Commissioner of Police, Siddipet, Siddipet District. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Gajwel, Siddipet District. 4. The Circle lnspector, Thoguta Siddipet Diitrict. 5. The Sub - lnspector, Doulthabad, Siddipet District. 6. Aadi Renuka @ Rekha, Wo. Venkateshwarlu, Aged a-boqt 40r O.cc- Housewife, Flio. Ii.No. 1-36, Doulthabad Village and Mahdal. Siddipet District. 7. Aadi Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged bbout 50 years, Occ- Agriculture, Ri/o. H. No. l-36, Doulthabad Village and Mandal. Siddipet District.

8. Aadi Srinivas, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 47 years, Occ- Agriculture, Fi/o. H. No. 1-39, Doulthabad Village and Mandal, Siddipet Dishict. Petition under p.Jticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of respondents particularly the Respondents No.s- 2 to 5, without issuing any notice having no authority, in interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's agriculture land admeasurlng to an extent admeasuring to an extent of Ac. 5.06 % in different Survey Numbers such as Ac. 1 .18 y2 gls in Sy. no. 'l22lA - El, Ac. 1 .02 gts in Sy. no. 1'19lE1 - E2;{Ac. 1.11 gts in Sy no. 1,18A, Ac.0.26 gts in sy no. 127lAAand Ac. o.29 gts in sy no. 113E situated at Douttabad Viflage and Nrandar. siddipet Diskict in spite there being concerned varid documents. is highry iflegar, abuse of power, arbitrart'and,against the principles of naturar justice and arso viorative of Articles 14, ana'".5b0-R of the constitution of rndia consequenfly direct the respondents no. 2 to 5 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners agriculture land. Petition under section 15'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased pleased to direct the Respondents Nos- 2 to 5 not to interfere with the petitioner,s agriculture land admeasuring to an extent admeasuring to an extent of Ac. 5.06 % in different survey Numbers such as Ac. 1.rg y2 gts in sy. no. 122rA - Er, Ac. 1 .02 gts in Sy. no. 1191E1 - E2, Ac. 1 .11 gts in Sy no. 1 18A, Ac.O.26 gts in Sy no. 127lAA and Ac. 0.29 gts in sy no. 113E situated at Dourtabad Viilage and Mandal, Siddipet District, pending disposal of the above Writ petition. counsel for the Petitioner : SRr RAMAVAR.AM CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1to5 : SRI M.SR|NIVAS, AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Re$pondents No.6to8 : The Court made the foflowing: ORDER .THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26369 of 2025 Q@JB: Heard learned counsel for the petitione.r and Sri.M.Srinivas, Icarneci Assistant Covernrnent Pleader l:or [{ome .rppcaring for respondent Nos.1 to 5. With'their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at tlre admission stage itself.

2. 'l'his writ petition has been filecl seeking, thc follon,inp,, praver:- "to declnre the nction of respondanls prtrtictrltrltl tlrc Rt'spotrdcttts Nos,2 to 5, tpithout issuittg rnrl nottce, lttn,ing no attlnritry, in interfering into tlrc peaceful possession and enjoyment o.[ tlrc petitioner's agriculture land rulnrcl*ring to ttrt txtent tdnrcnsuring o.l' Ac 5.06 lz in different Suroell Ntintbers sut'h us Ac.l,18 1/z gts in Sr1 No.i22/A-E7, Ac.1.02 gts in Sry no.l l9/L'.1-1.?-, At:.7.71 gts in Sry no.7'18A, Ac.0.26 gts in Sy no.127/AA nrid Ac.0.29 gls in St1 no.113E, situated at Doultnbnd Village mul Mnnrlal, Sidtlipet District, itt sltita lherc being concerned unlicl dot'tit,/r',lls i.s ligliltl !llegtl, ttbtrsa of pttrurr, ultitrnry tnd ngainst llte print-i1i!L:; of nulttnil 1tt.tice nnd dso t,ioLttii,t, of Articlcs 14 nnd 300A of the t'onstitrttion o.f Intlit const,quently direct tlrc respondents no.2 to 5 nol tr nterfcre u,ith tlw penceful possessiott nnd enjoyntent of l:he petitioners ngriulhtre lfind."

3. Brief facts stated in this writ petition are that petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor oi land admeasuring total extent of Ac.5.06lzz i.e., Ac.1.'18 rn gts in Sy No.122/ A-L-.l, Ac.1.02 11ts in Sv No.179/87-E2, Ac.l.11 gts in Sv No.118A, Ac.0.26 gts in Sy No.127/AA anci Ac.0.29 gts in Sl, No.l13E, situatecl at Doultabad Vittage anci Manclal, Sicklipet L)istrict, having acquirecl the satne through registerct{ satc tjeecls Lrearing ckrcumerrt Nos.5718 of 2016 clatecl 28.07.201,6,'1936 of 2015 dated 04.03.2015, and 8780 of 2017 datecl

74.72.2077. The case r-rf the petitioner is that responclent Nos.6 to 8 are interiering r,r,ith the petitioner's peaceful posscssiorr anrl enjoymerrt ovc,r the G- e' i \ ) subjcct property and are claiming back the lands solc{ to the petitioner. , [;urthcr case of the petitioners is that the respondent authorities are i.terfering i. the civil dispute and are threatening the petitioner to conrprotrrise rvith responclent Nos.6 to 8. 4ra.ieved b,r., thtt sanle, this writ pt:tilion is filed. t't

4. Learned Assistant 'Governrnent pleader [.r I{ome appearing for responclent Nos.1 to 5 placed on recortl ir.rstructiclns issued b), Sub_lnspector rrf [)rrlicc', Doultabad Police Statio:r, Sitlciipet District, Whercirr it is stateti that rcsponc{ent No.6 made complaints on 01 .08.2025, 07.08.2025, 11.0g.2025 ancl 13'0tl'2025 stating that petitionc'r trr:spasscd her l;rnd ancl requested to take actiorl agairrst petitioner. on such conrplaints, GD entries w,ere made and tlltrins the course of the enquiry, it raras revealeci that the dispute betwr:en pariic's is ciVil tlispute. I lcrrcc, ()n ()5 08.202.5 , 12.08.2025, 1g.0g.2025 the corrrp'rl3i111s oi rs5pondent No.6 w,cre clos,*.d as,Civil in Nature,. It is further stateti that the respondent authorities did not threatened the petiticiner to settlc the disprute with the respontlent Nos.6 to g. 5' [iecorc{ing the submissious matle by learned counsel appearing or.r either sitlc, rt'itllouI expreissing any opinion on the merits of the case anrl since the respondent No.6 complaints dated 01.0g.2025, 07.0g.2025, 11.0ft.2025 and 13't)tt'2025 registered against the petitioner are closed as 'Civil in Nature,, this Court tieertns it appropriate to clispose of the writ petition granting liberty to petitioner to seek appropriate rernedy as available unrler law, if otherw,ise aggrievec{' lt is made clear that the respondent authorities shall not interfere J with the petitioner's possessiorl over the subject property without I'ollowinll due proceclure as contemplatcd undt:r law,.

6. Accordingly, il'ris writ pctiiion is rlisposed of. Miscellarreous applications, if an1, pending, shall stand closed. No orc{er as to costs. \ //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The PrinciPal Secretariat Bt ALI BAIG ANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER kar Bhavan

2.ThecommissionerofPolice,siddipet,siddipetDistrict'

3.TheAssistantCommissionerofPolice,Gajwel,siddipetDistrict. 4. The Circle-lnspector, Thoguta Siddipet District' 5. The Sub - lnspector, Doulthabad, Siddipet District' 6.oneCCtoSRIRAMAVARAMCHANDRASHEKARREDDY'Advocate. loPUcI

7. Two ccs to GP FOR HOME, High court for the state of Telangana' [oUT] 8. Two CD CoPies. BSK q+ PMK t I l hlr L) 19 BEC zffi t { * iqTC Ht--n. HIGH COURT DATED i0310912025 ORDER WP.No.26369 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE VI'RIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ?r