✦ High Court of India · 28 Oct 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 28 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
28 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,124 words

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION NO: 8421 OF 2015 Between: Mr. Sada Vishnu Reddy, S/o. Mr. Keshav Reddy, Aged about 25 years, Occ Business, E?Jo. 7 -1512, Yadagiri Nagar, Near Santosnagar, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner-GHtvlC, Tank Bund, Hyderabad 3. ZonatlCommissioner, North Zone-GH tvlc, Hyderabad 4. The Dy. Commissioner, Circle No XV, GH[/C, Qutubullapoor, Ranga Reddy Dist

5. The Deputy Collector & Thasildar, Qutubullapoor, Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist 6. The Dist Coltector, Ranga Reddy Dist, Lakidikapool, Hyderabad 7. t\I/s. K.K. Owners Society, a public society registered under the Societies Registration Act, (Regd. No.949/2011, dated 12.09.2011)having its office at House No. 6-40A, Apurupa Colony, Jeedimetla Village, Quthubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, represented by its President Mr. Hemanth Kumar Khandalwal S/o. Mr. Mata Prasad Khandalwal, aged about 52 years, Occ Business, Fl/o. H. No. 6-40/A, Apurupa Colony, Jeedimetla Village, Quthubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

8. [Vlr. Divera lnfrastructure & Projects Limited, Rep by its official [Vlr. Sumit Sharma S/o. Lalit Prasad Sharma Aged about 31 Years, Occ Service, Ri/o. Flat No. 203 in Second Floor, Reliance Manore Apartment, Road No.2 Banjara Hills

9. Mrs. Champa Devi Choudhary, W/o. Mr. Raghuram Choudhary Aged about 36 Years, Occ Housewife, Resident of H. No. 12912, Main Road, Bapuji Nagar, Hyderabad

10.tMr. Suresh Choudhary, S/o. Mr. Chenaram ChoudharyAged about 27 Years, Occ Business Fl/o. H. No. 12912,Main Road, Bapuji Nagar, Hyderabad 1 1 . Mr. Rajaram Choudhary, S/o. Mr. Durgaramji Choudhary Aged about 35 Years, Occ Business Rl/o. H. No. 12912, [Main Road, Bapuji Nagar, Hyderabad

12.Mr. Mchan Choudhary, S/o. Mr. Durgaramji Choudhary Aged about 33 Years, Occ Btrsiness R/o. H.-No. 12912, Maln Road, Bapuji Nagar, Hyderabad

13. Mrs. C,akubai Choudhary, Wo. Mr, Venaram Choudhary Aged about 38 Years, Occ Business, RYo. Plot No. 78, Vimanpuri Colbny Quthhullapur, Ranga Reddy District '14. Mr. Veeramachaneni Srilakshmi, W/o. Mr. Veeramachaneni Srinivasa Rao Aged about 35 Years, Occ Business, Fl/o. Plot No. 48, 49 Chanakeshava Nagar, Gajularamaram, Quthbullapur, IDA Jeedimetla, Ranga Reddy District

15. tVr. K. Suresh Babu, S/o. Mr. K. Mohan Rao Aged about 45 Years, Occ Businer;s, R/o. Plot No. '109, Shapur Nagar, Hyderabad-500055

16. Mrs. Pcne Devi, W/o. Jeevaram Choudhary, Aged about 45 Years, Occ House wife, Rio. Plot No. 1, Ho.No 2-1gOlA, Grrenpark Enclave, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad 1 7. IVlr. Ralkumar Surana, S/o.Late C.L. Surana, Aged about 63 Years, Occ Businer;s, R/o. 369, Mithila Nager, Road No 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, 500034

18.[Vlrs. Sz,vithri Mahesh, S/o. Mr. G. Mahesh, Aged about 60 Years, Occ House wife, R/o. 3 - 4-97 1 I 3, Ba rkatpura, Hyder abad-27

19. Mrs Manju Surana, S/o. Mr. Rahkumar Surana, Aged about 59 Years, Occ House'ruife , R/o. 369, Mithila Nager, Road No 10, Ban.jara Hills, Hyderabad, 500034

20.Mr Rahul Surana, S/o. Mr. Rahkumar Surana, Aged about 34 Years, Occ Busines,s, R/o.369, Mithila Nager, Road No 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, 500034

21. Mr Rak-.sh Surana, S/o. Mr. Rahkumar Surana, Aged about 32 Years, Occ Business, Ryo. 369, Mithila Nager, Road No '10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, 500034

22. Mr Nitin Kumar Goel, S/o. Occ Brrsiness, R/o. 369, Hyderabad, 500034 Mr. Chandra Bhan Goel , Aged about 36 Years, Mithila Nager, Road No 10, Banjara Hills,

23. Mr Nellure Satyanarayana, Years, Occ Business, Rl/o. Hyderatrad- 500055 S/o. Late N. Venkatappaiah, Aged about 52 B/20, Apurupa colony, lDA, Jeedimetla, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed {herewith, the High Court may be pleased to iss re order or orders, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 4 in granting building permissions in the land admeasuring Ac.1 'l 3.5 in survey 36, 37, 38, 4U6, 2a5,286, 287 and 288 situated at Jeedimefla village, euthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy without converting the nature of the land use as illegal, arbitrary, 1 un lawful and void and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to grant building permission in the land admeasuring Ac.113.5 in survey 36,37,38,40/6, 285, 286, 287 and 288 situated at Jeedimetla village, Quthbullapur ft/andal, Ranga Reddy District and demolish all the illegal constructions of respondent 8 to 23. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. N9: 11106 OF 2015) , Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No 1 to 4 not grant any building permission in the land admeasuring Ac.113.5 in Sy.No. 36, 37, 38, 40/6, 285,286,287 & 288 situated at Jeedimetla Village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. M.HARTHIKA, REP. FOR SRI G.TIRUPATHI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI M,DHANAN.TAY REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.5 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI C.RAMACHANDRA RAJU The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.8421 of 2O15 ORDETI,: This rvrit petition is filed seeking following relief: "lo cl.eclare the action of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, in qanting building permtssions in the land admeasunng Ac.11il.5 in Sy./[os.36, 37, 38, 40/6, 285, 286, 287 and. 2ll9, situctted at Jeedimetla Village, Quthbultapur Mandal, Rongareddy District, as illegal and arbitrary."

2. Ms. M. Harthika, learned cotrnsel representing Mr. G. 'l'hirupathi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner on record ir; present

3. Le:arned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this CotLrt to withdraw this Writ Petition.

4. Pr:rrnission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismisst:d as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismisst:d //TRUE CO SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT I SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI G.TIRUPATHI REDDY, 2. One CC to SRI C.RAMACHANDRA RAJU, loPUCl vocate [OPUC]

5. One CC to SRI IM.DHANANJAY REDDY, SC FOR GHI\4C IOPUC] : Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADIUN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. BSR GJP Two CD Copies -${ --ttiffi :rlii#ffi HIGH CC)URT DATED iitBl1012025 J, I (J t * S s1 t:I B 2t]26 * ORDER WP.No.8,t21 of 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN , WITHOUTCOSTS N N\,r

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments