High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularty in the nature of writ of lvlandamus in not registering the FIR (First lnformation Report) against(i). pulla Sudharshan Reddy, S/o- Pulla Rukma Reddy, R/o- Kamala Nehru Colony, (ii).Surity Venkatesh, (iii). Sunku Vipran aayana or Umesh, S/o- Sridhar R/o- I\/arikal, (iv) Hari Teja, S/o- Surity Ramulu, (v).Golla Raju, S/o- yerrappa. (vi).Golla Anjaneyulu, (vii).Hanmi Reddy, S/o- Narayana, (viii).pentarnini Narsimhulu, S/o- P.Narayana, on the Complaint given by the petitioner, dated 07l10l2o21for cor.-rrritting criminal trespass. wrongful restrair and criminal intimidation anc r; ls : ,trommitting offences U/S 341 , 354 , 437 ' 447 , 506 r/w 34 lPC, which is illegal, iarb tr ary and also violation of Sections 154 and -t 5t of the Crtminal Procedure Cod:, a'rc also against the Hon'ble Supreme ('ourt ,uclgment in Lalith Kumarr Vs. Gcverrrnent of UP and also violation of gurdelires issued by the Central Governn.srt vide Circular No..15011/9'1/2013'SC/ST-W, dated- 12t1O12015, anC c,rrrsequently direct the Respondent Nor;.2 to 5 to register the First lnformatio - R::port on the basis of the Complaint given brr tlte Petitioner on 07l1ol2o21 and oon( lrct the enquiry as per the law and prcter:t Pe"itioners life and liberty. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition ttrder Section 151 CPC praying that in the oircurnslances stated in the affidavit filed in sllpp6rt of the petition, the High CoLtrt may be pleased To direct the Respotrdent Nos.2 to 5 to register the First lnformzrticn Report (FlR) against (i).Pulla Su,llrarshan Reddy, S/o- Pulla Rukma Reddy, F7o Kamala Nehru Colony, (ii).Surity, \/e nkatesh, (iii) Sunku Vipranarayana @) Llrnesh, S/o- Sridhar, R/o- t\4arikal, (ivt }lar 'Ieja, S/o- Surity Ramulu, (v).Golla RalLt, S/o- Yerrappa, (vi) Golla Anjanevr-r rr (vii).Hanmi Reddy, S/o- Nar;ryana, (viii). Pentamini Narsimhulu, 5/0- P I'larayana, on the basis of the Complainl given by the Petitioner on 0711012021 irnd c:nduct the enquiry as per the law anc pn:tecr Petitioners life and liberty. Counsel for the Peti':ioner: SRI Y. BALAJI Counsel for the Res )ondents: GP FOR HOME The Court madr: the following: ORDER ! t. E r i.r THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W,P.No. 33254 of 2O2t ORDER None appcars for thc petitioncr. Heard learned Government Pleader for Home appcaring for respondents, and perused the record.

2. The case of the petitioner as set out in the afhdavit hled in support of the u,rit petition is rhar though he had approached the respondents-authorities and submitted a complaint/ representation , d,L.O7 .lO.2O2 1 , the said compiiant has not been acted upon by the respo ndc nr s-a u rhorities by registering FIR againsI the persons named therein, which action of the respondents it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary.

3. Per contra, learned Govcrnmcnt pleader for Home appearing for respondents submirs that thor,rqh tJrc complaint of the petitioner is dt.07. 10.2O21, shc hacl senl the same through registered post and it nas received by the authorities on

29.11.2021, and the same is ur-rsigned. t

4. Learned Government Pleader further submits that though the responden ts-authorities on rcceiving the aforesaid complaint have called the petitioner to submil a signed complaint, there is no I I,! I I I I l I i I I l l I i '. IEI I I I t i i I -r- respons,lr f -, rr-r the petitioner by filing a signe(l cror lp aint for the authoriLi : I rke action.

5. I har .' I aKen noLe of thc respective submissitlll; aIade.

6. F rr',i r I r,lgard to the submissions macle : s :[rlr'': and taking note ol tlrr ac t that the complaint, dL-O7 .lO 2''-)21 , st Lted to have bee n frlc:, 1 I r- the petitioner by sending the samt: th roul,h registered post (t'- .().11.2011, is an unsigned c(-)ml)llir t. for the responrlco s -:uthorities to take further action. th is (lr urt is of the view tlrzrl i- the grievance of the pctiLioner a:; :Lll-'ged in the aforesai:l r r:rplaint still persists, the pctitioncr sl.lo tlc be directed to app:-: rrr I the respondents-authori ties by' sLti I n ti t1q tr signed complairtt f r: the authorities Lo take action. On tl c petllroner submit,inl: signed complaint, the authorities shr 1l L rok into the same an:l ::l:e lurther action, in accordance rt'itl'i in.'

7. -qr- l ,r r to the above obscrvalion ancl dLr':c r it n, the Writ Petitior 1 s;posed of. No ordel as to costs

8. (1. r ,r c ucnLlv, misccllaneous petitions, il :i..\ p:rlding shall stand c;os. r //TRUE COPY// ,\A \\ SI)-A. JAYASREE SSIS'TANT REGISTRAR S;EI)TION OFFICER HvderaL ad

1. The Prir ,tioal Secretary' Dept. Of Home, Secre z itJblti,iro'leneral of Police Narayanpet District.l'elarc;at a State 5 Til; S;i,; i' r,rrdent of Police, Marikdt viitage and M;ndal \irravanpet a in. oe,,rrv S iiperintenient of Police, Marikal Village arrd lt'4 a rdal District,' -el,rr ga'ra State . Narayairc,jt t ist'ict. Telangana State ,*j,; The lita te of Teiangana, To, t .. Marikar Porice Station, Marikar circre, Narayanpet : if [[+"J,X!H: 39,'f :lflifif ,:3..{'"?ii?[i',1;3%'"1?',y,"il.stateorre,angana,at \ TJ BS 6_-- I I ! HIGH COURT DATED:23104'2025 ORDER WP.No.33254 of 2021 : F' :t t i i ( ( f q f o ,./. i -r: s TAt{- ,T ( ? t l; '\ ?,25 * c l- -'\:a: r.- iL ' '! T{'t ' --_ -/_ f ( DISPOSING CIF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS , II I (, .L \5 .l