The High Court · 2026

Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in FIR in Cr. No. 1591 of 2025,d|. 1810712025, P.S Gachibowli, Cyberabad District. ...Respondents l.A. NO: 2 OF 21r2s Between: Thadikamalla Rishi Kumar Guptha, S/ o. T.srinivasa Rao, Aged about 32 years, Presently residing at 31 1 1, Humbolt Ave, Santa Clara, California-95051 Rep. by his GPA, T.Srinivasa Rzro, S/o. Kasi Vishwanadham Age. 62 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 132, 2nd Floo', S;rlipet, Jangareddygudem, Eluru District, Andhra pradesh _ 534001. AND The state of rr:langyana, Rep by its Public prosecutor High court for the state of Telangana at H'Tderabad, through SHO Gachibowli, Cyberabad District ... Petitioner/Accused ... Res po n d e n ts/De-fa cto Complainant Petition under section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum or Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to extend the ordr-'r passed by this Hon'ble court in crl.p No. 11217 ol 2025. dated 09.09.2025 for a period of four weeks in the interest of justice. This Petitiorr corning on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of cdminal Petrtion and upon hearing the arguments of sri V Ravi Kiran Rao, senior counsel for PILLIX LAW FIRM, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, Additic,nal Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No.1 and of Sri eazi Salar Masood r\atif. Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CRIMINAL PEnTto N NO: 164'.t3 0F 2025 Between: The state of relangana through the Station House officer, Gachibowli p.s., cyberabad commissionerat, rep. by The public prosecutor, High court for the state ofTelangana, iyderabad - 500066. AND ... petitioner/Respondent Thadikamalla llishi Kumar Guptha,, S/o. T.srinviasa Rao, age 32 years, R/o. 31.1 Humbolt Ave, Santa Clara, California - 950051. R/o. 16_280, Near BUDS and BLooM convent vinayaka temple street, Jagareddigudem west Godavari district, Andhra Prader;h- 534447 .1, petition un rer Section 483(2) of BNSS prayins that ,, ,nu ",r.r;li""l3liiil3f;l the Memorancum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to cancel the arrticipatory bair granted to the Respondent/A-.1 vide orders dated 9.9.2025 in Crl.P.No.'l 1277 of ZO25 on the file of Hon'ble High Court. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Petitioner and Sri V Ravi Kiran Rao, Senior Counsel for PILLIX LAW FIRM, Advocate for the Respondent. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER a:l IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA o.2 of Between: InlAnd o. PETITION No.16413 2o.25 DATE: 3O.OL.2OZ6 [email protected] of 2O2S The t)tate of Telangana, Thro,rgh the Station House Officer, Gach ibor,vli P.S., Cyberabad Commissionerate, Rep. by the Public prosecutor, High Cotrrt for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad - 500066 Thac ikarnalla Rishi Kumar Guptha AND Petitioner/ Re spondent Respondent/Accused COMMON ORDER The criminal petition No. 16413 of 2025 is filed by the Public Prosecutor seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent-accused uide order dated 09.O9.2025 in Crl.p.No. |L2TT of 2025.

2. I.A.No.2 of 2o2s in crr.p.No.tr277 of 2o2s is filed by the ;rccursed seeking extension of time to surrender before the 2 concerned authorities as passed in order dated 09.O9.2O25 in Crl.P.No. t1277 of 2025.

3. Heard Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the Petitioner-State, and Sri Qazi Salar Masood Aatif, learned counsel for the Respondent- Accused.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that, in view of the direction of this Court to surrender within fifteen days, the respondent-accused has failed to surrender before the investigating authority and has not complied with the conditions imposed by this Court. Therefore, he requested the Court to cancel the bail granted to the respondent-accused.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent-accused submitted that though anticipatory bail was granted, a Look Out Circular (LOC) is pending against the respondent-accused. He further submitted that W.P.No.27954 of 2025, relating to the said LOC, is pending before the concerned Court. As such, the respondent-accused could not appear before the investigating authority, and hence requested for extension of time to surrender before the concerned authorities. \ \ 3

6. Upon considering the submissions of both learned counsel anrl on perusal of the material available on record, it is notecl thrt the respondent-accused has not compliecl ,"r,ith the conditirn of surrender due to the pendenc-y of the I-oc. Hence, the invcstigating authorities are directecl r-rot to arrest the resrontlent-accused until he submits his suretics before: the concerned authorities.

7. I* vicw of the above, crl.p.No. L6413 o{' 2o2s ancl I.A.No.ll of 2025 in crl.p.No.l.r2TZ of 2025 are accordingly dispose d ol I\{iscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand <:losr:d SD/. M.OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatp ly, at Prashanth nagar, Cyberatrad (with records if any)

2. The Station House Officer, Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad District. 3. One CC to SRI PILLIX LAW F|RM Advocate tOpUCI 4- Two CC)s to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High Court for the State of Telangana, t at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two Cfr Copies ADK/psl l, HIGH COIJRT DATED: 30/01 12026 COMMOI.I ORDER THE S ( C) ll 6 '{ IrR 2t126 * t l.A.No.Z <tt 2025 in CRLP No.11ZTT of 2025 ln/And CRLP No. 16413 of 2025 DISPOSING oF THE CRLP No. 1G413 of 2o2s AND l.A.No.Z ,cf 2025 in CRLP No. 11ZTT of 2025 b 9"