✦ High Court of India · 02 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 02 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,719 words

Acts & Sections

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the. affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction one more particurarry in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the respondents in not conducting survey for demarcation of rand in rand in sy.No. go1t2 to an extent of Ac.0_0.100 gts' Sy No. 801/1 to an extent of Ac.0-0'r00 gts, Sy. No. 801/6 to an extent Ac.0- 1000 gts, Sv. No 801/3 to an extent of Ac.0-0.100 gts, sy. No. B0.r/5 to extent of Ac 0-0900 gts, sy No. 800/4 to an extent Ac 0-04.00 gts, total an extent of Ac.0_ 26gts and sy.no.793/'r to an extent of Ac.0-01.00 gts, sy. no.7g3l.r to an extent of a Ac.0-0'l .00 gts Sy no 793/1 to an extent of Ac.0_09.00 gts Sy.no,793/3 to an extent of Ac 0-05.00 gts, Sy.no.793 t4 to an extent of Ac.()_01 00 gts Sy.no.793/5 to an extent of Ac 0_01.00 gts Sy,no.7g316 to an exrent of Ac.0_01.00 gts Sy no 793/7 to an extent of Ac 0-0 1.00 gts Sy.no.7g3l, to rn extent of Ac.0-01.00 gts sy no Tg3l1() to an extent of Ac.0-01.00 gts sy.no 7g311 1 to an extent of Ac.0_ 01 00 gts sy no793112 to an extent of Ac.0-0'1 .00 gts ald Sy.no.7g3l13 to an extent of Ac 0-05 00 gts totaily an extent Ac.0,027gts totirr to extent of Ac 123 situated at chinnama,areddy virage and Mandar, Kamaredy District as being arbitrary, ilegar and consequenfly direct the respondents rJo.5 and 6 to conduct survey for demarcation of the rand in rand in Sy. No. g01r>- to an extent of Ac.0- 0'100 gts' sy No 801/1 to an extent of Ac.0-0100 gts, sy. \o. 801/6 to an extent Ac.0-1000 gts, Sy. No 801/3 to an extent of Ac.0_0.100 gts, Sy No. 801/5 to extent of Ac 0-0900 gts. Sy No 800/4 to an extent Ac.0 04.00 gts, along with Sy no 793/1 to an extent of Ac 0-01.00 gts,sy.no-7g3/'r to ar extent of Ac 0-0.1 .00 gts Sy.no.793 l1 t<t an extent of Ac.0_09.00 gts Sy.no.793/3 to an extent of Ac.0- 05 00 gts, sy no.i'g3/4 to an extent of Ac.0-01.00 gts sy.no 7g3l5 to an extent of Ac.0-0 1 00 gts sy no 793/6 to an extent of Ac.0-01.00 g s sy.no.793 /7 to an extent of Ac 0-01.)0 gts Sy.no 793/B to an extent of Ac.0_0_ 00 gts Sy.no.793/10 to an extent of r\c 0-01 .00 gts sy.no 793 t11 to an exterrt of Ac.0_01.00 gts sy no'793r12 to an extent of Ac 0-0'1 00 gts and sy.no.7g3l13 to an extent of Ac 0-05.00 gts totaily an extent Ac 0.027gts totar to ext.At. an Ac 01.239ts situated at chinna tvarareddy virage, Kamareddy Mandar an i D)strict. l.A.NO:1 oF 2025 Petition Under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the circ umstances stated in the affidavit fired rn support of the petition, the High court may be preased to forthwith direct the respondents No.5 and 6 to consider F-Lirre apprication of the petitioner dated 30 06.2 025 f or conducting of survey and dernarcation of rand in land in sy No 801/2 to an extent of Ac.0-0100 gts, sy. No 80.1/.1 to an extent of Ac.0-0100 gts, Sy. No 801/6 to an extent Ac.0-1000 gts, Sy. No 801/3 to an extent of Ac.0-0i00 qts, Sy No. 80.1/5 to extent of Ac.0-090t gts, Sy. No 800/4 to an extent Ac 0 04 00 gts, arong with Sy.no 793 11 to an e (tent of Ac 0_01.00 gts,Sy.no.793/1 to an extent of Ac.O-0.1 .00 gts Sy.no. 793/1 lc an extent of Ac.0_

09.00 gts Sy no 793/3 to an extent of Ac.0-0s.00 gts, Sy.no.793 14 to an extent of Ac 0-01 00 gts Sy.no.793/5 lo an extent of Ac.0-01.00 gts Sy no.793/6 to an extent of Ac.0-01.00 gts Sy.no.793/7 to an extent of Ac.0_01.00 gts Sy.no.793/8 to an extent of Ac.0_0.1 .00 gts Sy.no.7g3l10 to an extent of Ac 0-01 00 gts Sy no.793/1 1 to an extent of Ac. 0-01.00 gts Sy.no.793t12 to an extent of Ac.0_ 01.00 gts and Sy.no.793/13 to an extent of Ac.0-05_00 gts totally an extent Ac 0.027gts total to extent an Ac. 0 1,23gts situated at Chinnamallareddy village, Kamareddy A/landal and District. p ending the disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the petitioner : SRI KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR, LEARNED COUNSEL REPRESENTING MS. EANONRiOTVi;' Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : AGp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : AGp FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER t THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.261O6 of 2O2!i ORDER: He:rrd Sri Kou,turu Pavan Kumar, lear ned counsel representin8 Ms. Banclari Dirrra, Iearned cou tsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, lor responclent Nos. I to 6.

2. Thc petitioner is claiming that he is the at solute owner and possess;or of lancl admeasr-Lring Ac.O.O1.CO guntas ln Sy.No.793/1, Ac.0.O9 gunt.rs in S_",.No.793/1, A(.0.05 guntas Sy.No.793/3. Ac.0.0 i gunt.ls ln Sy.No.79lil4, Ac.O.01 guntas iS_v No 79"/-, Ac.0.01 guntas 1n ir'. No.793 / 6, Ac.0.O 1 guntas l1-l Sr..No.793/7, Ac.O.O1 guntas Sy.No.793l8, Ac.O.01 gLrntas in S_v.No.793l 1 0y Ac.0.01 guntas ln Sy.No.793/ I i, Ac.0.O 1 guntas 1n S'..No.793l 12, Ac.0.05 gu ntzls S_r,.No.793/ 13, Ac.O.O1 guntas Sy.No.BO1/1, Ac.0.1O guntzrs ir-r Sr..No.B01/6, Ac.0.Ol guntas 1n Sy.No.BCt 1/3, Ac.0.09 guntas Sy.No BO1/5 ancl Ac.0.04 guntas in Sy.No.B0O/4 sitr-rated at Chinn,r Mallareddr. Village, Kam.areddl, Manderl, I(amzrredcly District. ln proof ol 2 the same, he has fi1ed latest passbooks and NALA proceedings dated 27.07.2022.

3. It is the specilic contention of the petitioner that though he has obtained conversion proceedings dated 27.O7.2022 from thc 4th respondent, he has not obtained lay out and sold plots to individuals.

4. [n paragraph No.9 s'rit affidavit, he has stated that third part)' startecl illegal cor-rstruction without obtaining anv valid permissior-r from the official respondents and thcrefore, he has submittccl a representation dated 03.O7.2025 to the Gram Parrchavat authorities requesting to demolish the illeg:rl constructions and initiate immediate action' The same was not considered. Therefore, he has fled WP.No. 197 15 of 2025 before this Court and the said writ petition is pedding.

5. In paragraph No. 1O of the writ. affidavit, the petitioner also contended that he has filed O.S.No.64 of 2023 against third parties [or Pcrpetttal Injunction and the trial Court granted interim injunction and the said suit is pending and the said interim order is subsisting.

6. During the pendency of said suit and subsistence of the interim order, thc petitioner has filed F-lir-re application -' vide ID.No.DtrRO2250 1199558, ciared 30.06.2025, u,ith the 4th responrlent u,ith a req Llest to conduct survey and demarcation ol' aforesaid land. Br-rt, the s. me \ /as not considered. Therefore, he has lilccl the presen writ petition seeking a direction to the 4(h respondent to cons der the F-line applicertion to conduct sllrvc\', clcmalcate , 1-re aforesaid propertles

7. During the course ol' l-rcaring, Icar.red colutsel for the petltroner on instructions sr_rl;m ittccl that the petitioner has already lilerl I.A.No.363 ol 2025 l;clirre the t-izrl Court in O.S.No.64 c'f 2023 under C)rder XXVI Rule 9 of C.P.C. to appoint an Advocate Commissioner lor the purpose of conducting surve-\,. The said erppliczrtion is pendirlg. Therefore the petitior-rer has to pursLrc said l.A. and get the aforesaid propertv surveyed

8. Liberty is also grar-rted to thc ltetitioner lo get survey conducted irt respect of suit scheclr-rle ltroperty ir O.S.No.64of 2023 and also zrforesaid propert_v admeasurin 1 Ac.O.O l.OO guntas liv.No.793/ 1, Ac.0.09 guntas 111 ri1 .No.793l 1, Ac.0.05 guntas 1n S_v.No,793/:3, Ac.0.Ol guntas Sy.No.793/4, Ac 0.01 gLlntas in S.r..No.793/5, Ac.O.01 guntas 4 in Sy.No.79316, Ac.O.Ol guntas in Sy.No.79317, Ac.0.ol guntas in S1'.No.7g3/g, Ac.0.01 guntas in Sy.No.793110, Ac.O.Ol guntas in Sy.No.793111, Ac.O.O1 guntas irr Sy.No.793/12, Ac.O.OS guntas in Sy.No.793l13, Ac.0.01 guntas ir-r S_v.No.BO1/ i, Ac.0.01 guntas in Sy.No.BOl/ 1, Ac.0.1O guntas in Sy.No.BOt /6, Ac.O.Ol guntas in Sy.No.8Ot/3, Ac.0.09 gr-rntas in Sy.No.80i/5 and Ac.0.04 guntas in S1,.No.800/-l situated at Chinna Mallareddy Village, Kamareddy Mandat, I(amaredd_y District, demarcate the same by fixing the boundar-ics. lt is for the civil Court to consider the said application. 9. With the aloresaid observations, this Writ petition is disposed of. Miscellancous petitions pending, if any, tshall stand //TRUE COPYII ,t S /-P. PONNA KRISHN A ISTANT REGISTRA R SECTION OFFICER t Buildings, State of Telangan a at HyderaGd 1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, S 2 The Chief Commissioner of Land Adm in istration 3. The Disk ict Collector, Kama reddy Mandal and District 4. The Tah asildhar Kamaredd y fvlandal and District 5. The lnspector of Surve y and Land Records, Chinnamalla Reddy village, Kamareddy [\4andalan d District 6. The IVtandal Surve yor Kamaredd y, Mandal and District 7 The Station House Officer. Chin namalla Reddv village, Kamaredd B. Two C Cs to GP FO R REVENU E, High Court for the State of Tela ngana at Hyderabad lourl 9 Two CCs to GP FOR HOME Hrgh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad ampal[, Hyderabad N v

10. One CC to IT/S BANDARI DIWA AdVOCAI 1.1 Two CD C e [oPUC] closed. To SA BS 4L HIGH COURT DATED:0Zt09t2O2S ORDER WP.No.26106 of 2O2S \ ,t J o L/r 5f,t1t' \ ( {' t 15 sEP 2$25 I D Esear c \r'I DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. I \) q \5

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments