✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 29 Sep 2010

B. Sudhakar Rao v. The State of A. P

Criminal Petition No. 10386 of 2009SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU

Case at a glance

Decided
29 Sep 2010
Bench
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU

Outcome

Dismissed

In the result, the petition is dismissed subject to the above

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. In the result, the petition is dismissed subject to the above observations made herein. _____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J. Date: 29-09-2010. DSH

Judgment

Cause title

The State of A. P., Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P., Hyderabad. --- Respondent

This Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10386 OF 2009

ORDER:

Though this petition is filed seeking quashing of Crime No.289 of 2009 of Vijayawada I Town police station, relating to offences punishable under Section 34 (a) of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968, and Section 135-C of the Representation of People Act, 1951, the only point urged by the petitioner’s counsel before this Court is that the petitioner’s Maruthi car was seized by the police in this offence and that it is lying un-attended and that when he applied for return of the car, he is being driven from pillar to post asking him to approach the Deputy Commissioner of Excise and the Collector, as the offences involved were under the above two enactments. In such a situation, the petitioner is at liberty to move the appropriate Court or authority for necessary reliefs relating to release of his car or interim custody of his car. I do not find any valid and legal reasons to quash F.I.R. in this case.

Operative part

2.

In the result, the petition is dismissed subject to the above observations made herein. _____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J. Date: 29-09-2010. DSH

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, the petition is dismissed subject to the above

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 — s. 34(a); Representation of the People Act, 1951.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Sep 2010. The bench was SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 10386 of 2009). ← Search more judgments