The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. Registrarof Companies, (For the State of Telangana), lt floor. Corporate Bhawan, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad-s0O 068. .. Respon-dent ' ...RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under section 528 of B.N.s.s. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition the High court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings in in cc No.6g/20:12 pending on the file of court of Spl. Judge for Triar cases Under Economrc fffences, cBr court complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences sec.7(6) Rrw 447 of companies Act 2013 l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that n the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition,th,: High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in cc No.6g/2022 pending on the file of court of Spl Judge for Trial cases Under Economic offences cBl court complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec.7(6) Rlw 447 of oompanres Act 2013, pending disposal of the quash petition This Petition comrng on for hearing,upon perusing tre [\l]emorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sRl L. HARlsH, Learned counsel representing sRl PRAVEEN KUMAR cHALLA,Advocate for the Petitioner, the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri B.NARASIMHA SHARMA, ADDTTONAL soLrcrroR GENERAL oF rNDrA for the Respondent No. 2 CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11233 OF 2025 Between: Narala Vijay Krishna, S/o Narala Rajendra, Aged about 41 Years, Occ.Pvt Consultant, H.No.2-2-1 137/1 , New Nallakunta, Hyderabad-500044. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. .. Respondent

2. Registrar of Companies, (For the State of Telangana), ll floor, Corporate Bhawan, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad-500 068. ...RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crrminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings in CC No.69/2022 pending, on the file of Court of Spl. Judge for Trial Cases Under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec.7(6) Rlw 447 of Companies Act 20'13. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No 69/2022 pending on the file of Court of Spl. Judge for Trial Cases Under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec.7(6) Rlw 447 of Companies Act 2013, pending disposal of the quash petitron. This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SRI L. HARISH, Learned Counsel representing SRI PRAVEEN KUIVIAR CHALLA ,Advocate for the Petitioner the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri B.NARASIMHA SHARMA, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA for the Respondent No. 2. / CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11265 OF 2025 Between: Narala Vijay Krishna, S/o Narala Rajendra, Aged about 41 Years, Occ.Pvt Consultant, H No 2-2-113711 , New Nallakunta, Hyderabad-50{1044. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor liigh Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. .. Respondent

2. Registrar of Companies,, (For the State of Telangana). ll floor Corporate Bhawan, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad-500 068. .,.RESPONDENT/ OEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, tne High Court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings in CC No.85/20:22 pending on the file of Hon'ble Court of Spl. Judge for Trial Cases Under Eccnomic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec.7(6) Rlw 447 of Companies Act 2013 l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No.85/2022 prending on the file of Hon'ble Court of Spl Judge for Trial Cases Under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec.7(6) Rlw 447 of Companies Act 2013, pending disposal of the quash petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SRI L. HARISH, Learned Counsel representing SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR CHALLA ,Advocate for the Petitioner, the Public Prosecutor on behatf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri B.NARASIMHA SHARMA, ADDTTIONAL SOL|C|TOR GENERAL OF INDIA for the Respondent No. 2. CRIMINAL PETITION NO:11267 OF 2025 Between: Narala Vijay Krishna, S/o Narala Rajendra, Aged about 38 Years, Occ. Pvt. Consultant, H.No.2-2-1 13711 , New Nallakunta, Hyderabad-500044. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. .. Respondent

2. Reqistrar of Companies, (For the State of Telangana), ll floor, Corporate Bhiwan, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad-500 068. ..,RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings in CC No.62/2022 pending on the file of Court of Spl. Judge for Trial Cases Under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec T(6) Rlw 447 of Companies Act 2013. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No.6212022 pending on the file of Court of Spl Judge for Trial Cases Under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec.7(6) Rlw 447 of Companies Act 2013, pending disposal of the quash petition This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SRI L. HARISH, Learned Counsel representing SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR CHALLA ,Advocate for the Petitioner, and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri B.NARASIMHA SHARMA, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INOIA for the Respondent No. 2 CRIMINAL PETITION NO :11 268 0F 202s Between: Narala vijay -Krishna, S/o Narara Rajendra, Aged about 4i years, occ.pvt Consultant, H.No.2-2-1 137/i, New Nallaklnta, Hyde"rabad_500r)44 AND ...PET|T|ONER/ACCUSED No. 3 The State of Telangana, Rep Telangana at Hyderabad by its Public Prosecutor High Court of .. Respondent

2. Registrar of companies. (For the state of reranqana), I 'roor, coroorate Bhawan. Bandtaguda, Nagole. Hyderabad-s00 0'68 ' ...RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 529 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the crrminat proceedings in cc No.65/202:l peioing on tne rite of court of Spl Judge for Trial cases Under Economic crfiences, cBl court !o1ole1, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences sec.7(6) Rt,u 447 of companies Act 2013 l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 52g of BNSS praying rhat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal- petition,the Hign court miy ue pleased to stay all further proceedings in cc No.65/2022 pendiig on tre fill or Hon'ble court of spl. Judge for Trial cases Under Economic offenies, cBl court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec T(6) Rt\N 447 of Companies Act 20 13, pending disposal of the quash petition. This Petition comrng on for hearing,upon perusing the l\,emorandum of Grounds of criminal Petitron and upon hearing the arguments of sRl L. HARlsH, Learned counsel representing sRl pRAVEEN KUMAR cHALL.A ,Advocate for the Petitioner, the Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No..l and sri B NARASIIVIHA SHARMA, ADDTIONAL solrctroR GENERAL oF rNDrA for the Respondent No. 2 CRIMINAL P ETITION NO: 11273 OF 2025 Between: Narala Vijay Krishna, S/o Narala Rajendra' Aged about 41 Years, Occ Pvt ttto z- 2- 1137t1, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad- 500044. Consultani, 't-t. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3 AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hydeiabad .. Respondent

2. Registrar of Companies, (For the State of Telang-a1a), ll floor, Corporate Bhiwan, Bandlagjuda. Nagole, Hyderabad- 500 068. ...RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings in in cc No.6312022 pending on the iile of Honble Court of Spl Judge for Trial Cases Under Economic Offences, CBI court complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences sec. 7 (6) Rlw 447 ol Companies Act 2013 l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition,the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in cc No. 6312022 pending on the file of bourt of Spl Judge for Trial Cases Under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences Sec. 7(6) Rlw 447 of Companies Act 2013, pending disposal of the quash petition This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sRl L. HARISH, Learned counsel representing sRl PRAVEEN KUMAR CHALLA ,Advocate for the Petitioner, the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri R.R. MANGULAL, Standing Counsel for the Respondent No' 2 CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11 27s OF 2025 Between: Narala Vijay Krishna, S/o Narara Rajendra, Aged about 4i years, occ.pvt Consultant, H No.2-2- 1 1 3711 , New Nallaklnta, Hyde-rabad-500r)44. ...pETtTtONERyACCUSED No.3 AND '1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its public prosecutor Hiqh Court of Telangana at Hyderabad

2. Registrarof companies, (For the state of reranoana), I .roor. coroorate Bhawan, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad_S0O 0'6g. " ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 52g of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, thr: High court may-be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings in in cc No.64t2022 pe-nding on thJ rite -cgr of Hon'ble court of spl. Judge for Trial cases Under Economic on"encei, court complex, Namparry at Hyderabad for the offences Sec.7(6) atw iii ot Companies Act 20 1 3. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal'pelition,the High court may ue pleased to stay all further. p_roceedings in cc No.64l2oz2 pendiig on the fil'e of court of spl Judge for Trial cases Under Economic offences, cBl 6ourt corpJ.r, Nampally at Hyderabad for the offences sec.7(6) Rlw 447 of ccmpanies nct z'ors, pending disposal of the quash petition. This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sRl L. HARlsH, Learned counser representing sRr PRAVEEN KUMAR CHALLA ,Advocate for the Petitioner, and the public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and sri B.NARASIMHA sHARMA, ADDITToNAL sollctroR GENERAL OF INOIA for the Respondent No. 2 cRl MIN AL PETITION NO: '1127 8 0F 2025 Between: y :x 3, JJ : [ -5',,:]i,',t, iii.,Hix, ftffi i:1'fi ,ot%10. o:3333 o|l " ^','' o cc P vt ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No' 3 AND 1 2 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of iijL.'sli;t ivJ"iiora ResPondent roor',corporate Sf; 3f Xfi :3:,".:ry,',J::iiJSstlhfi v:Fl;'""ll3J1E8;'a)',,f ...RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT stateO PetitionunderSection52BofBNSSprayingthatlnthecircumstances 'in'ine-'fU".orrnaum ot Giounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be oreased to quash tne c.m,nli proceeoings in in cc No.67 12022 pending on the fire of Court of Spl. Judge toi f iat Casei Under Economic Offences' CBI Court "r.rrrirrrv ,iuva""n'J for the offences sec T(6) Rtw 447 of companies 3;#; Act 2013 I.A. N O:1 OF 2025 PetitionunderSection52BofBNSSprayingthatinlhecircumstances stateo irline lrremorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be oleased ro stay ail rrrtn", pro.""Jings in cc No.6712022 pending on the file of ilourt of Spl. Judge tor T'iat Cas6s Under Economic Offences' CBI Court EI.ii,* rllmparrv"at uyoerabad ior the offences Sec T(6) Rtw 447 of Companies X;i i0ir. pending disposal of the quash petition ' This Petition coming on for hearing' upon perusing the Memorandum of GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofSRlL.HAR|SH Learned Counsel representing for SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR CHALLA 'Advocate Inl-,"O,,on"r' the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and Sri , *O*O'.,,O SHARMA, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA fOT thc Respondent No 2 The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: I l i I i I I I I I I I I THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.11231 11232 11233 't1265 11267 11268 11273 11275 and 11278 OF 2025 COMM ON ORDER: Crl.P.No.11231 ot 2025 is filed by the petitioner - accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C-C.No.61 of 2022 on lhe file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Section 7(6) read with Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013

2. Crl.P.No.11232 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner - accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.6B cf 2022 on lhe file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases uncler Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Section 7(6) read with Section 447 of the Companies Act, 20'l 3. 3 Crl.P.No.11233 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner - accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.69 cf 2022 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases uncler Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered ( 2 for the offence under Section 7(6) read with Section 447 of the '.'1 Companies Act, 2013

4. Crl.P.No.11265 ot 2025 is filed by the petitioner - accused l.,lo.3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.85 of 2022 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered for tlre offence under Section 7(6) read with Section 447 ot lhe Companies Act, 2013

5. Crl.P.No.11267 ot 2025 is filed by the petitioner - accused No 3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.62 of 2022 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Section 7(6) read with Section 447 of lhe Companies Act, 20'1 3.

6. Crl.P.No.11268 ot 2025 is filed by the petitioner - accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.65 o'f 2022 on lhe file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Section 7(6) read with Section 447 of lhe Companies Act, 2013. { 3

7. Crl.P.No.11273 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner _ accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceeclings in C.C.No.63 of 2022 on lhe file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Section 7(6) read with Section 447 of lhe Companies Act, 20 13 B. Crl.P.No.'l 1275 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner _ accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C No 64 of 2022 on lhe file of the learned Special Judge for Trral Cases under Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Section 7(6) read with Section 447 of the Companies Act, 20 13.

9. Crl.P.No.1 1278 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner _ accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No 67 of 2022 onthe file of the learned Special Judge for Trial Cases unoer Economic Offences, CBI Court Complex, Nampally at Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Sectron 7(6) read with Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013.

10. Since the petitioner is the accused No.3 in all the petitions, they are heard together and disposed off by way of this common order Heard the submissions of Sri L Harish, learred counsel ) l "t \ I representing Sri Praveen Kumar Challa, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.Narasimha Sharma, learned Additional Solicitor General of lndia for respondent No.2 and Sri R.R.Mangulal, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 in Crl P. No. 1 1273 of 2025

11. The learned petitioner counsel has submitted that the allegations do not attract the ingredients of Section 7(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 and that accused No.3 is the Company Secretary and accused No.4 is the Company. He further submitted that the allegations that the company is not functioning at the given address and that it is not doing any software business as mentioned by it during its registration and that they are conducting fraudulent transactions is all false. He further submitted that none of the victims have given a complaint, therefore question of deceiving anybody does not arise He further submitted that the said allegations do not point out any offence agalnst the petitioner who is accused No.3. He therefore, prayed to quash the proceedings against the petitioner.

12. The learned Additional Solicitor General of lndia has submitted that the petitioner herein is the Company Secretary and there is legal foundation for the alleged offences and the prima facie contents of the complaint do attract the offences against the l - petitioner. He further submitted that by virtue of the Orders by the Government of lndia, Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), accused No.4 company was ordered for lnquiry by the Minist:y vide its letter dated 03.09.2 021 to inquire into the sustained rnvolvement of Chinese Nationals in fraudulent and money launcJering activities through companies registered in lndia An lnquiry Officer was appointed to visit the registered office of these cornpanies and in the instant case, one such company being the A4 company has been incorporated with the involvement of Chinese Nationals who were operating fake websites and using telegram app to defraud innocent victims. lt is has been reported that they created 12 companies and one such company is the 44 company and instructed locals/Directors to open bank accounts of these fake companies, which were controlled by the Chinese nationals. lt was furlher found on verification that the practicing company secretary (PCS) has certified the location of registered office cf the company showing at a place mentioned against the name of their company respectively. He further certified and signed the incorporation documents (SPICE), DIN application, situation of registered office submitted through online MCA portal by stating tha: 'any false or incorrect particulars of any information or supprcsslo n of any material information shall attract punishment for frauT section 441, I \ 6 448 and 449 of the Companies Act, 2013 which provide for false statement and for false evidence respectively and I shall be liable for action under Section 448 of the Companies Ad, 2A13 for wrong cedification, if any found at any stage". Thus, the learned ASG has \ \.1 prayed to dismiss the petition

13. Perused the record.

14. lt is pertinent to refer Section 7(6) and 447 of lhe Companies Act, 201 3 and the same is extracted hereunder "7. lncorporation of company - (6) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (5) where, at any time after the incorporation of a company, it is proved that the company has been got incorporated by furnishing any false or incorrect informatron or representation or by suppressing any material fact or information in any of the documents or declaration filed or made for incorporating such company, or by any fraudulent action, the promoters, the persons named as the first directors of the company and the persons making declaration under clause (b) of sub-section(1) shall each be liable for action under section 447." "447. Punishment for fraud - Without prejudice to any liability including repayment of any debt under this Act or any other law for the time being in force, any person who is found to be guilty of fraud, involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees or one per cent. of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than the amount involved in the fraud, but which may extend to three times the amount involved in the fraud: Provided that where the fraud in question involves public interest, the term of imprisonment shall not be less than three years. Provided further that where the fraud involves an amount less than ten lakh rupees or one per cent. of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower, and does not involve public interest, any person guiity of such fraud shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term I 7 .../ { which may extend to five years or with fine which may extend to fifty lakh rupees or with both. Explanation. -For the purposes of this section- (i) "fraud", in relation to affairs of a company or anybodv corporate, includes any act, omission, concealment of any fact or abuse of position committed by any person or any other person with the connivance in any manner, with intent to deceive, to gain undue advantage from, or to injure the interests of, the company or its shareholders or its creditors or any other person, whether or not there is any wrongful gain or wrongful loss; (ii) "wrongful gain" means the gain by unlawful means of property to which the person gaining is not legally enti ed; (iii) "wrongful loss" means the loss by unlawful means of property 1o which the person losing is legally entifled."

15. The record points out serious allegations against the petitioner herein. The petitioner is accused No.3, is alleged to have t certified the certificates of incorporation of accused No.4 company. It is further alleged that he has created certain dummy accounts and diverted the amounts into the said account. lt is firrther alleged \ that the accused No.4 Company is not carrying out its business at the registered address and also not carrying out the activities as mentioned under its registration. lt is also alleged that accused No.3 has made his family members/colleagues as Cirectors i.e. accused Nos. l and 2 in the accused No.4 company with an intention to defraud the gullible investors to facilitate the Chinese nationals to be ultimate beneficiaries. Therefore, prima facie allegations poinl out the alleged offences against the petitioner 8 herein Hence, the petitions lack merits, therefore, the same are liable to be dismissed a .,i 't6 In the result, the Criminal petitions are dismissed Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed sD/- L.Vt ASSISTANT JAYA LAXMI REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER I I To, Bh awa n, Ba n d ta j ud a, lra'go r", HvJliairi : i6,Or6a CBI Court Compiex, r.rampafry rt Hyj#'i'jl l The speciar Judoe fo.r. Triar of cases Under Economic offences, 2. Registrar of Comoanies, (Fo.r the State of Telangana), ll floor, Corporate Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of retangana at ' Iyo""?"";:: 4. One CC to SRL PRAVEEN KUMAR CHALLA Advocate [OpUC] 5. One CC to SRl. B NARASIMHA-SHARMA Additionat Solicitor General of lndia , Hish Court for tne state oileij"g;"" li[ii"*o"o 6. One CC to Sri R.R. Mangulat, Standing Counset tOpUCl 7 . Two CD Copies kul/PSl- HIGH COURT DATED:1 5/09/2025 COMMON ORDER i / //q \b \, t,'' 14: 31 0[I 2025 \- -\- r,nTc Hf-l) $( L t*) CRIMINAL PETITION Nos. 11231 11232 11233 11265 11267 11268 11273 11275 and 11278 OF 2025 DISMISSING AI-I-'II II] CRL.PETITIONS @ LalN