High Court · 2025

Petition under Order 47 Rule '1 R/w.1 14 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the I :tition, the High Court may be pleased to review the order passed in Writ Petil r n No 25970 of 2025 dated 18-9-2025 and pass such other order or order. This petitron coming on for hearing, upon perusing {ir petition and affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of )T.J.VIJAYALAKSHMI, appearing on behalf of Review Petitioner, SRI B.VlDl-l" \ SAGAR, rep, SRI ROHIT POGULA appearing for the Respondents No.1 to il rsst. GP for Revenue appearing of the Respondents No 7 to 11, SRI ASHOK IEDDY KANATHALA appeanng for the Respondent No.12, Ms.KEERTI KAB: A appearing for the Respondent No.'1 3, the Court made the following. ORDER HON' t}I-F], SRI .IUSl'ICE K. LAKSHMAN I.A.No.4 OI. 2025 Writ I'etition No.25970 OF 2025 oRD[,]{ lleard Dr. J.Vijayalakshrri. lcarncd counsel lbr the review petitioncr and Sri B.Vidhya Szrgar. lealrred counscl leprcsenting Sri Rohit Pogula. lealnccl counscl lirr rcspondcnt Nos.l kr 6 herein / writ petitioners, lear-ncd Asst. (lor t.l)leaclcr lirr l{cvcuue, Sri Ashok Reddy Kanathala, learned counsel fbr l2'r' r'espondent and Ms. Keerti Kabra, learned Counsel appearinu lirl l3'r' rcs;rondcnt.

2. 'the petitiorler rcspon(lcnt No.9 in the atbresaid writ petition, filed thc prest:nt levit--rv pttition [(] rc\ iew the order dated 18 09.2025 in W P.\o.15970 ol'201i

3. \\/rit petiLioncrs lllcd thc slid ri'ril. pctiLion challenging the order dated I 1.07.202-5 passed br, .1'l' resporrdent allowing the applications filed by the rcsporrdent Nos.6 to l2 therein / respondent Nos. l2 to l7 hercin tluough Bhu Bharathi l)oftal in'lM-24 Module lor PPB- Courl Cases to incorporate their names in the revenue records and issuing thc pattadar passbooks fbr the land admeasuring I I Ac.3.22 gLrntas III Sy.No. 169/,4A o1- Pcndval Villlr Maheshu,araur Mandal. R.anga Rcclcll, Drstrict 4 Vidc orclcr clatetl I 8.09.1015. this ('ourt clr .r oscii ol'thc sritl u'rit petitior-r dirccting 3''l rcsponderrt thcrcin to tli..1 r sc ol thc uppcal (il reccircd) lilcd b1 thc rvrit pctitioners Lrndcr !,itiorr l5 ol'thc Telangana Biru Iliralati (ltccord ol' Rights rn Ir rd) .,\cL, 2015 challcnging the ordcr dated I 1.07.1015 ol'rcsp()n(i( 1 t lr.o.J. str-rctlr Il accordance rr ith lnu'. by putting the pctitioncl's. r'( - | )u(l.nt \os.(r ro la thl-rcirt arrd all iutelcsted parlics ou noticc rrr,l , . irrtlinu tlre nr an oltpottuuitr. u ilhin a pcriod ol- thrcc (3) rnorrtlr. I o111 111.' riutc ol recc'ipt ola ct'rpr of'tlte said oldcr

5. I'hc petitioner herein tllecl thc PreserrL r.cvir'rr Pq1i1j1r11 contcnding that thc rvrit petitioners suppressccl the r r real lllcd bctirre- rcsporldent No.9 hcrein Joint (lollector', l{ange It -' ld1 t)isrrict, on

14.08.2025 r,ide SI{ No.18478 of 102-5 plior to rhe tLLr: o1'llline olthc prese nt *'rit petition i.e. 29.08.2025 I)ivisron }le nclr . 'this ('orrrt vicle order dated 16.07.2024 in W.A.No.759 ol 2024 grirrLr :d libcrry ro rhc petitioners to approach civil Courf tbr redressal of'tlt( i - gricvar-rce. The Division IJench also clarified thai the entrics, il' r r y, rnadc in thc revenue t ecorcls are sub.iect to outcome o1'civil srr t whiclr may bc tiled bl the parlies. Suppressinq the said lact ol'liling appeal belore I the 9'r' respondent hcrein, the *,rit pctitionels llled thc present writ pe f ltlon 6- Sri B.Vidh)'a Sagar, learnecl courrsel appearing lor writ [)etitioners rvould fairly submit that thc rvrit pctitioners did not in{brm the said lact to the learned counscl on lecord, due to the said rriscornrrunication, the1, havc not nrL'utioncd about the l'iling ol'said appcal b1,thc writ petitioners bctorc rhc 9'r'rcspondent hcrein

7. ln the light ol the sard subrrissions, this lcvierv application is allowed. The order dated 18.09.101i in W.['].No.]5970 o1'1025 passed b1' this Coun is modilled, grantinlr liberty to the writ pctitioncls, to approach civil Court tbr redlcssrl ol their qricvancc and the entries, il an1,. made in the revcnue reco|cls arc subicct to outcomc ol-civil suit to r1eb cd bv thc m

8. With the albresaid nrodillcirtion. this rcvicw is disposed of Consequently, misccllancorLs pctitions, il- any, pcrrding in this revicw shall stand closed. 'o''i5$r'Pfi"J'-!'&'f HiH G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, The Pfincipal Secretary' Revenue Department' Hyderabad- 500022' The District Collector' Ranga Reddy District' 1 2 Secretari0t' Telangana State' \

3. The Joint Coltector, O/o District Collector, Ranga Red: I District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, R: tr3a Reddy District 5. The Tahsildar, Maheshwaram [Vandal, Ranga Reddy I strir;t 6 One CC to Dr J V|JAYALAKSHATil, Advocate. [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the St, te of Telangana Iour]

8. One CC to SRt ROHTT POGULA, Advocate. tOpUCl 9. One CC to SRt ASHOK REDDy KANATHALA, Advrr.:, re. tOpUCl 10. One CC to Ir./s KEERTt KABRA, Advocate. [OpUC] 1 1. Two CD Copies BSK GJP \| j i I I I I I I I I i I i i HIGH COURT DATED:0511212025 n I ORDER l.A.No.4 OF 2025 IN WP.No.25970 of 2025 .f" < l --' .l i. iiLii ftm ,/ /...r' ,t/ DISPOSING OF THE REVIEW PETITICII WITHOUT COSTS tt ,Af"\ tt-