The High Court · 2025

Judgment

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. Chinthapalli Saran R:/o H.No.2-2, SC Andhra Pradesh. va. D/o Ravi Kumar, Aqed about 30 years' Occ. Software, 6oiony, VinianampaduVillage and Mandal, Bapatla District, ...Respondents/ComPlainant

PetitionunderSection52SofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against pe-titioner/Accused in Crime No.iOtglzozs, on the fite of KpHB Cotony police station, cyberabad for the offences U/s 69 BNS. l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 l.A. NO ;20F 2025 Between: Chinthaoalli Saranva. D/o Ravi Kumar, Aged about 30 years' Occ' Sort*"i6, nyo rl.r.16.z-2, sc Colony, Vinja=nampadu Village and Mandal, Bapatla District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner/2nd Respondent in iA Nos 2 & 3 of 2025 AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecu.r r. High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. 2 Pallepogu Gopi, S/o Mohan Babu, Aged about 31 y: us, Occ. Software, Rl/o H.No. 1-25, Vinjanam Padu Village, Yaddana P r' i Mandal, prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh ...RespondenUPetitioner/Accused irr A nos. 2 & 3 ot 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that stated in the [Vemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitiorr. be pleased to permission to compound the offence, ar No,1013/2025, on the file of KPHB Colony Police Station. : the offences U/s 69 BNS, in the interest of justice and eqr i loss and injury will be caused to the petitioner and 2nd respc l the circumstances the High Court may i quash the Crime yberabad District for y or else irreparable rdent herein. l.A. NO: 3OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that I the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petitior, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the roceedings against Petitioner/Accused in Crime No.1 01 3/2025, on the file of I pHB Colony police Station, Cyberabad for the offence U/s 69 BNS in the in r rests of justice and equity. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing re lrzlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing -.t e arguments of Sri Chiranjeevi Tanikonda, Advocate for the petitioner ani Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the ti rspondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER e \ THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 anil3 q[2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.11247 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER: 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.1013 of 2025, on the file of KPHB Colony Police Station, Cyberabad District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 69 of BNS, 2023.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent No.2/defacto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to 0 compound the offences and to record compromise.

3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with ') theil respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services '\ *.l 2 -I I:TD. J Crl?_ I1217 )0J5 l Committee for the State of Telangana yrde orders da zd 02.09.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court egal Services Committee is directed to submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued b', this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appei red before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of . 'elangana the Secretary of the above said Authority identified t re parties and submitted a report dated 10.09.2025 stating that ttrr parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercio ,, entered into compromrse.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2'.t are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and tr: proceedings in Crime No.1013 ol 2025,on the file of KPHB Colonl' Solice Station, Cyberabad District, are hereby quashed subject tc, the petitioner paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thouszr d Only) to the Director, Sanik Welfare, Hyderabad and Rs.5,0001 'Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana State Legal Servir:r s Committee, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from oday and file proof of same before the Registry. I 3 L:I D. J Crlp _l 1247 2025

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. U. SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR e SECTION OFFICER To, First Class, Kukatpally, Medchal- Malkajgiri District.

1. The lV Additional Junior civil Judge cum XV Additional Judicial Magistrate of 2. The Station House Officer, KPHB Colony police Station, Cyberabad 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC to Sri Chiranjeevi Tanikonda, Advocate [OpUC] 5. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUTI ABK,/SA Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Total Amount of Rs. '10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand onty ) has been paid by sri r. chiranjeevi, counsel for the Petitioner as drrected by the Hon'ble court vide order dated 19.09.2025 as Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees'Five thousand only ) to the Telangana State Legal Services Authority and filed Memo as proof of compliance USRNo. 107900 of 2025 and Receipt No. 801 dated 2S-O}_2O25. % I .-\ \: ._*1 HIGH COURT DATED: 1910912025 i I {f ,< c\ . -j:r. I / ^. :.'a- ;.. i: 1[l \ '2/ [!C ?sn i-r I ,t, ! \: ;/ , COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.11247 of 2025 ALLOWING THE l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION ff{ 6 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No. IN Crime No.1013/2025 (on the file of KPHB Colony Police Station, Cyberabad) OF 2025 Between: Pallepogu Gopi, S/o tVohan Babu, Aged about 31 years, Occ: Software, R/o H.No.1-25, Vinjanam Padu Village, Yaddana Pudi Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. AND

1. 2 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. Chinthapalli Saranya, D/o Ravi Kumar, Aged about 30 years, Occ: Software, R/o H.No.2-2, SC Colony, Vinjanampadu Village and Mandal, Bapatla District, Andhra Pradesh. . . . Petitioner/Accused Respondents/Complainant JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE It is submitted that the present petition was filed to quash the proceedings

1. against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.1013/2025, on the.flle of KPHB Colony Pollce Station, Cyberabad for the offences U/s 69 BNS.

2. As both the parties have come to an understanding, as initial misunderstandings and misgivings were sorted out amicably, and therefore, the 2nd petitioner/Defaeto complainant, is not interested to prosecute the petitioner any longer in view of the settlement and compromise arrived at between the paties herein. t.q,4 d- S^hlW t . t,- 7

3. It is submittcd that, the Memorandum of loint compr rmise memo for the petitioner and the 2"'i respondent/defacto complainant marriar e was performed on 22-08-2025, after filing of the FIR No.1013/2025 0n the ft € of the KpHB police Station, Cyberabad, against the petitioner given by the 2 . responde nt/defacto complainant. Now both parties came forward to a s( tlement as under compromtse.

4. it is submitted that the compromise and setflement ar- red at, between the parties, for withdrawal from the prosecution, in the interests r 'justice as both the career of the petitioner as well as the 2nd respondent will re damaged as the misunderstandlngs, are sodcd out between them and ar ricably settled and therefore, the 2nd respondent, is no more interested to prosr :ute the proceeding against the petitionrtr and to take the same to the logical end urt may be pleased

5. It is submitted that, in view of the same, the Hon,ble Cr to permit the petitioner and 2nd respondent herein for rv prosecution and to compound the offences U/s 69 BNr; compromise and to quash the proceedings in Crime No.101:/ KPHB Colony Policc. Statron, Cyberabad against the petit ( interests of justice and equity. 6. This Compromised memo is the full and final settlemen. rf the both parties. thdrawal from the by recording the 1025, on the file of fier herein in the Therefore, the ioint memo of compromise is being filerl seeking permission of this Hon'ble couft, to cornpound the offence and to record t re compromise and to quash the proceeding in the above crime No.1013/2025, t n the file of KPHB Colony Police Station, Cyberabad for the offences U/s 69 BNS. It ls therefore prayed that the Hon'bre court may be pr: rsed to receive the joint memo of compromise and to permit the petitioner and tlrr 2nd respondent to compound the offence in the interests of justice and equity. l i I I l p (r8' dw sc,l, Aw c F 4

6. ,*;yn Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel to the spondent No.2 \f . 18'og' )'o,l s I : I : i i l !q& Petitioner dN sa*'1- Respondent No.2