✦ High Court of India · 15 Apr 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Apr 2025
Length
1,459 words

Smt. G.Neeraja Wo. G.B Prasad, Housewife, R/o. 10-3-311113D, Road No. 2 Castle Hills, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 057. ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Counsel for the Appellants: SRI POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDY, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K.V. BHANU PRASAD, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1348 OF 2024 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against the order dated 21 .04.2015 in Writ Petition No '16715 of 2009 on the file of the High Court. Between: ) 1 2 The State c1 Telangana, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Departmenr. Secretariat. Hyderabad. The Special ()fficer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Hyderabad under the Repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Flegulation) Act, 1976, Hydererbad, represented by the Joint Collector, Hyderacad, Person-in- C harge ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS AND Sri A.S R. Prasad, Si/o Sri A S.N Hyderabad - 500 09(3. N/urthy, Plot No. 43K, Road No. 71, Jubilee Hills, ...RESPONDENT/WRI I- PETITIONER lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under S;ection 151 CPC praying that rn the circumst;rnces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order rn \/y' P No. 16715 of 2009, Dt.21104/2015, pelding disposal of the Writ Appeal Counsel for the Appellants: SRI POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDY, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K.V. BHANU PRASAD, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1350 OF 2024 Writ Appeal under cl,atl;e '15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the order dated 21 .04.2015 inW.PNc 17160of 2009 onthefileof theHighCourt. Between: 1 2 State. of Telang;ana Rep by the Principal Secretary Revenue Department secretarial, Hyderabad The Special r)fficer and Competent Authoritv, Urban t_and Ceilino. fy9grgPr9 under the. repeated Urban Land (Ceiling and Rrlgutation) Ac"t, 1976. Hyde.abaJ. rep. by the Joint Collector Hyderabai person .in-charg'e ,..APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS AND Smt. G. Neerala Wo. G. B. Prasad Housewife, R/o. 10-3-3.1 .1/13t.), Road No.2 Castle Hills, tvlababtanl . Hyderabad - 500 057 . ; . '.ii{t. -) ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order in W.P. No. 17'160 of 2009, D|.21 .04.2015, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal Counsel for the Appellants: SRI POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDY, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K.V. BHANU PRASAD, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1355 OF 2024 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred ag'ainst the order dated 20.02.2019 in W.P No.22114of 2013 on thefile of the High Court. Between: 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Hyderabad, under the Repealed Urban Land (Ceilin 1976, Hyderabad, rep. by its Joint Collector, Hyderaba Urban Land Ceiling, g and Regulation) Act, d. ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS AND 1 2 3 Sri G.Srinivas Reddy S/o. G.Ganga Reddy, Aged about: 50 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H,No. 6-3-'1 186/4/9, Kanchanganga, Begumpet, Hyderabad. Sri N. Anurag Reddy S/o. Nagesh Reddy, Aged about: 25 years. Occ Business, R/o. Plot No. 66 & 67, Ganga Stan, Doolapally Village, Qutbullahpur lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District. Sri L.l/lanohar Rao S/o. Late Venkat Rao, Aged about: 57 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No. 1 , Survey No.142, Saraswathi nagar Colony, Lotokunta, Secundrabad. ...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS lA NO: 2 OF 2024 4 Petition undr:r Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated In the affidavit filed rn r;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order irr W P.No.22114 of 2013, dl. 20.02.2019, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDY, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K. RAVI KUMAR FOR SRI S.V. RAMANA SRI O. MANOHER REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO: 1356 OF 2024 Writ Appeal undeT clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated

27.03.2019 in the !\r P No 64B1 of 2019 on the frle of the High Court Between:

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Special (lfficer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Hyderabad Under the Repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and F{egulation) Act, 1976,

3. The District C)ollector, Ranga Reddy District, State of Telangana 4. Revenue Divis onal Officer, Ranga Reddy District, State of Telangana 5. lVandal Reverue Officer, Manchirevula village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy i)istrict, State of Telangana ...APPELLANTSiR ESPONDENTS AND P.Bharathi Wo P.VSLrbba Rao, Aged about: 59 years, R/o. Flat Nc.201,2nd Floor, Harmony Heights, Road No.9, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/WRI T PETITIONER lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumst;rnces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order n W P No.64B'l of 2019, Dt.27.03.2019, pend ng disposat of the Writ Appeal ( Counsel for the Appellants: SRI POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDy, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent: SRI S. SRINIVAS REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL WRIT APPEAL NO: 't372 OF 2024 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against thd order dated 02J2.2022 in W.P. No. 167 15 of 2009 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. Department, Secretariat. Hyderabad by the Principal Secretary, Revenue 2 The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad, Under the Repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, '1976, Hyderabad, Rep. by the Joint collector, Hyderabad, Person-in-charEe. ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS AND Sri A. S. R Prasad S/o. Sri A. S. N. Murthy, Plot No. 43K, Road No.71 , Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 096 ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Counsel for the Appellants: SRI POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDY, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K.V. BHANU PRASAD, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT ^) THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YA.RA WRIT APPEAL Nos.1371 1348 1350 1355 1356 and 1372 of 2024 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice' Sujog Paul) \ Sri Pottig ari Sridhar Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of the learned Advocate General, for\ the appellants; Sri K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned Senior Counsel appearing fol Sri Kothapalli Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the respondents in W.A.Nos.137 1, 1348, 1350 ar-1 \i\72 of 2024; Sri K.Ravi Kumar, Iearned colirisel appearing for Sri l).V.Ramana, learned counsel for respondents in W.A.No.1355 of 2024 and Sri S.Srinivasr Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the r(:)spondent in W.A.No.1356 ol 2024

2. In vieu' o: the consensus arrived at by the lea:ned counsel for the parties vvhile affirming the impugned orders ot'the iearned Single Judge, a.s agreed, we deem it proper to hold that the relief granted to the writ petitionbrS shal1 be'applicable to 1,he extent of the land clairned by them in l-heir writ petitions. 2

3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ appeals afe disposed of. No order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYi/ SD/-I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 2 One CC to SRI KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI S.V. RAIVANA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI S. SRINIVAS REDDY, Senior Counsel [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies To, N/P L 7 'i6 _) - HIGH COURT DATED:1 510412025 { F{E Ii f/ 16- e o ,< lJ',i z't APH m5 , l) (n z o r\'i GOMM o \. GMENT W.A.Nos.1371, 1348, 1350, 1355, 1356 and 1372 of 2424 DISPOSI'{G OF THE WRIT APPEALS WITHOUT COSTS ( 2h \ I I i

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments