1. Pala Subhashini v. '1 . The State of Telangana, Represented

Petition Under Article 226 oI the C nstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fil therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order o direction more particularly a writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent t act upon the application dated O7l 0712025 having acknowledged on 07/0 12025 filed by the petitioners for correction of missing entries situated at E umalla village, (Old Kodangal Taluq), Vikarabad District, (old Mahaboob Nagar District) belonJs to their family herein being Pattedars, which was succeeded from Late P. Papamma W/o Ram Reddy' |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Ccurt may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to act upon the application dated 07-07-2025 having acknowledged on 07 -07 -2025 filed by the petitioners fr:r correction of missing entries situated at Erpumalla village, (old Kodangal Ta luq), vikarabad District, (old Mahaboob Nagar District) belongs to their family herein being Pattedars, which was succeeded from Late P. Papamma W/o Ram Reddy pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI CH.LAXMI NARAYANI, Counsel for the Respondents : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP f:OR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER i i I II' I I I i i I i I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I , THE HONOURABLE SRIJ TICE K. LAKSHMAN . WRIT PETITION 0.26014 of 2025 - ORDER: Heard leamed counsel for the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, leamed Assistant Government Pl er for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. According to the petitioners, re is a missing extent in the Iatest passbooks. Therefore, they h ve submitted a representation F dated 07.07.2025 to respondent No with a request to correct the ? wrong entries and to issue fresh Pattadar Passbooks. Despite receiving and acknowledging the d representation, respondent No.2 did not take any action. Ag$ieved by the said inaction of respondent No.2, the present writ pe ition is frled.

3. The petitioners rely on the al judgment and decree dated

01.02.1983 in I.A. No.113 of 1975 in O.S. No.76 of 1968, passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Ci I Court, Hyderabad.

4. The petitioners and one Sri ohar Reddy filed a suit in O.S.No.76 of 1968 against Sri Bu hi Reddy and two others for partition and separate possession f the suit schedule A to D '\. \ X 2 properties therein. A preliminary decree was passt:d on 30.01.1971, and the final decree proceedings were passed on 0 1 .02. 1983

5. It is the specific contention of the petitioners that certain extents are missing in the latest passbooks and title deeds issued by respondent No.2. Therefore, they have submittecl a representation dated 07.07.2025, requesting correction of the wrong entries. The petitioners specifically mentioned the missing extents and aiso filed copies of the preliminary and final decree proceedings

6. Rule 8 of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Rules, 2025 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules, 2025') prescribes the procedure for mutation based on an order or decree passed by a competent courl of law. As per Rule 8, sub-rule (6), the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) is the compet,lnt authority, and is required to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders within thirty days from the date of service of notice . Accordingly, the petitioners are required to submit an online application to the concemed RDO along with all the relevant documents, including the aforementioned preliminary and hnal decrees. Upon receipt of the same, the concemed RDO shall consider arrd dispose of the application in accordance with law 3

7. In light of the aforesaid dilcussion, the writ petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioners to submit an online application to the concerned RD , along with all the relevant documents, with a request to incl e the missing extents. Upon receipt of the said application, the shall consider and dispose of the same strictly in accordance ith the procedure prescribed under the Rules, 2025, by putting e petitioner and all interested parties including the defendants t q the said suit on notice and affording them an opportunity. Ther shall be no order as to costs. F As a sequel, miscellaneous -L- titions pending, if any, shall stand closed. I SD/.L.LAKSHMI BABU EPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COFY// To

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Dep at Hvderabad.

2. Thebollector, Vikarabad District IDOC 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High SECTION OFFICER rtment Se 4 riat State of Telangana ,Vi karabad. urt for the State of Telangana at LAXMI NARAYANAI Advocate [OPUC] Hyderabad. [OUT] 4. One CC to SRI CH 5. Two CD CoPies SA/BSK W. HIGH COURT DATED:0210912025 C.C. TODAY r+ (-) eY 815 *, _(a I:: -.: i:*l !CYl'" 7 7 Z * ORDER WP.No.26014 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. q 3