Ibrahimpatnam R.R. District v. The Commercial Tax Officer Saroornagar, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 04 Aug 2004
- Bench
- BILAL NAZKI, S ANANDA REDDY
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
M/s Venkateshwara Iron Castings (P) Ltd, Patelguda, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chairman Sri Ch.VittalKumar S/o. Narsaiah, 45 years, Mangalpally, Patelguda, Ibrahimpatnam R.R. District. ..... PETITIONER
AND The Commercial Tax Officer Saroornagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the orders Dt.29.6.2004 in Form No.5 is illegal, arbitrary, improper without authority of law and contrary to the provisions of APGST Act and set aside the same, consequently direct the respondent not to collect the disputed tax for the assessment year 1997-98 pending disposal of the appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and grant such other relief or reliefs as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KUNUKU DURGAPRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following
O R D E R:
(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki). Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would not insist on the writ petition being entertained, if a direction is given to the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal, expeditiously, as the appeal is pending for the last two years. Accordingly, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the appellate authority to dispose of appeal No.1106 of 2002, within a period of three months. No order as to costs. 4th August, 2004. _____________________ (BILAL NAZKI, J) _____________________ (S.ANANDA REDDY, J) To
The Commercial Tax Officer Saroornagar, Hyderabad. Two C.Cs to the G.P for Commercial Taxes, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
Two C.D copies.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 04 Aug 2004. The bench was BILAL NAZKI, S ANANDA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.