✦ High Court of India · 25 Aug 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Aug 2025
Length
1,055 words

3. P.Srinu, S/o.Arunachalam, Aged 50 years, Occ Driving, Rl/o.H.No.1- . 601321876lN 1, Pragathi Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary to government, Home Department, Telangana Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. The District Magistrate and District Collector, Ranga Reddy Elistrict at Hyderabad. Sub Divisional Magistrate and Revenue, Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District. Mandal Executive Magistrate-cum-Tahsildar, Serilingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad at, Hyderabad. Station House Offrcer, Raidurgam Police, Station, Scrilingampally Mandal, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. Devineni Satish, S/o Krstaiah, Aged 42 years,Rl/o.H.No.9-1-366/E16, Bapu ghat, Langer House, Golconda, Hyderabad. G.Chennaiah, S/o.Nagabhushnam, Aged 55 years, R/o.H.No.447lE22, Azalh nagar, Kon&pur, Serilingampally, Hyderabad. Devineni Jqfa, Wo.Kistaiah, Aged 38 years, Fyo.H.llo.9-1-366/E16, Bapu ghat, Langer F.buse, Golconda, Hyderabad.

10. Munta Ramulu, S/o.Timmanna, Aged 37 years, Fyo.H.No .4471E22, Az,alh nagar, Kondapur, Serilingampally, Hyderabad. 1 1 . Tallari RanE, S/o.Bala Kotaiah, Aged 35 years, R/o. Kukatapally, Hyderabad.

12.Palmunu Bhaskar, S/o.Janardhan Rao, Aged 40 years f /o.Flat No.502, Jayadurga Residency, Vijay Nagar Colony, Kukatapall)', Hyderabad. ...RESPONT}ENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ln(li circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th(, pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part c r praying that in the High Court may be one in the nature of respondents 3 to 6 on the complaint dated 09.09.2016 submitted by petitioners as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non discharge of legal obligation co,l the provisions of Section 107 of Code of Criminal Proced l articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and cor : respondents 3 to 6 to take the petitioners complaint on f l, the respondents 7 to 12 and enquire into and adjudicate the with law to protect the possession of pelitioners over thrl lnterim order dated 16.07.2015 in I A.No 511 of 2015 in C. rrred on them und er e, 1973 and offends equently direct the , issue summons to same in accordance rroperty covered by i No 843 of 2015 on the file of Court of Learned Senior Civil Judge, at L.B.Naga- l.A. NOiJ OF 20t16(WPMP. No:40520 oF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the , rrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hrgh Co r direct the respondents 3 to 6 to initiate necessary procl dated 09.09.2016 submitted by petitioners and decide thr with Chapter Vlll of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to r,r of petitioners over the property covered by lnterim order d. t No. 511'of 2015 in O.S.No.843 of 2015 on the file of Co.r t may be pleased to rdings on complaint ;ame in accordance )tect the possession :d 16.07.2015 in l.A. t of Learned Senior Civil Judge, at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the main writ I etition. Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI RAJA REOOY KONETI (Nc r Respondent No.1, 5 & 6: SRI R.LAXMIKANI AGP FOR Ho Respondent No.2 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Respondent No.7 to 12: M/s. BHARADWA.I PRESENT) H REDDY, ,lE ASSOCIATES The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.32741 OF 2016 ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking for the following relief 'to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in $e naturEgf V!{RIJ OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of respondent l.los. 3lo6 on the complaint dated 09.09.2016 submifted by petitioners i'es. illegal, irregular, irrational. amounts to non discharge ol legal obligation-sa.ilferred.on them under the provisions of Sectron 107 of Code of Criminal:Pr66edure, 1973 and offends Articles '14 and 21 of Constitutbo':,oJi..Xrdia ard consequently direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 to take .the '.petltiOners' complaint on flle, issue summons to the respondent Nos. 7 tc, 12€nd enqufe into and adjudicate the same tn accordance with law .to, protect the possessron of petitioners over the property covered by lnlerirn.ordpr dded 16.07.2015 in LA.No. 511 ot 2015 in O.S.No. 843 of 2O15 on:ttielfile ol Coirt of the earned Senior Civil Judge al L B Nagar and pass such othei order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem flt and proper in the circtJmstances of the c€se"

2. None appeared for the petitioners 3. Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondentsipolice submit that, pursuant to the complaint dated 09.09.2016. Crime No. 391 of 2016 was duly registered, During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties amicably settled the dispute before the Lok Adalat on 12.01.2023. ln consequence, the offences were formally compounded before the Court of the Xlll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajendranagar.

4. I have carefully examined the materials available on record. I / 2

5. ln view of the subsequent developments during tl^e pendency of this writ petition, and since the grievance raised hererr has already been addressed by the respondents and the underlying ;riminal case itself has been seftled between the parties, no further a ljudication is warranted.

6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as ha ring become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall sti nd closed //TRUE COPY// sd/'tl .OSMAN ALI BAre -- .-- fr' I rf rANr Rlcls+RAF \ .iECTION OFFICER I ORU (i One CC to SRI RAJA REDDY KONETI, Advocate I One CC to M/s. BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES, Advocare [( )pUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the Sla e of Tetangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Sr te of Tetangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies To, 1 2 J 4 q BSR PMK HIGH COURT DATED:2510812025 ORDER WP.No.32741 of 2016 : - '-:--.. 09 2i26 ) ,J., * + \ ,;il --tl ., ,| i) -/ =:a' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS a b$

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments