D.Appalanaidu v. Pradesh, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Following the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 12, 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a order, direction or writ more particularly a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to terminate the petitioner services by holding the proceedings No.2/2004 dated 04-03-2004 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional. Counsel for the Petitioner: MS.I.MAAMU VANI Counsel for the Respondent Nos 1 to 3: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following :
ORDER:
Operative part
Petitioner questions the order-dated 04.03.2004 passed by the 4th respondent- Person-in-Charge, Venkatabhairipuram Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society in placing the petitioner’s services under suspension. Earlier, this court by an order dated 30.8.2004 in Writ Petition No. 3171 of 2003 and batch held that the Writ Petition is not maintainable against the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society as the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society is not State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India amenable to Writ jurisdiction. Following the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Ka 13.09.2004. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Prl. Secretary Government of Andhra Pradesh, Agricultural and Co-operation (Co.op.IV) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 Joint Registrar/District Co-operative Officer, Vizianagaram District. 4 Person-in-charge, Venkatabhairipuram Primary Agriculture Co-op. Society, Via., Seethanayaram Post, Makkuve Mandal, Vizianagaram District.
2 CCs to G.P. for Cooperation, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
2CD copies
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Following the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 12, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 13 Sep 2004. The bench was V ESWARAIAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.