The High Court · 2021

For the Appellant : SRI K.HARIMOHAN REDDY, Advocate For the Respondent No.2 : SRI RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 : - The Court made the following: ORDER 4a, To THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KU]VIAR MACMA No.2594 of 2O11 JUDGMENT: It is rcprescntccl bl thc le:rrnecl Cor-Lnsei for the appellant that clr:ring thc pcndcrrcr,of thc Motor Accidcnt Civil Miscellancous Appcarl be lorc this Court, tlle matter r.r,as relerred to Lok Adalat. Upon such rei'erence, the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat and an Ar,r,ard has aiso becn passed bv the Lok Adalat to that eflect. In the light of the aforesaid submission, this MACMA is closed in terms of Award dated 2O.O2.2O21 passerl by the Lok Adalat. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed ,TRUE COPY// Sd/-B,SATYAVATHI AS{]ISTANT REGISTRAR SE toN o FICER Judoe. Citv Civil Court, Hyderabad

1. The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- lll '\ddit rona 2. On;CC to Sri K.Harimohan Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 3. One CC to Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala' Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare CoPY (Along with a copy of Lok Adalat Award) h ief Kj HIGH COURT DATE D:1 6/08/2021 ORDER MACMA.No.2594 ol 2011 CLOSING THE MACMA. \ \-t /(o{1rtE s i,., "tu^ ,6 SriP202t v * | :^. /f) BEFORE THE tOK ADALAT ,at \ HELD AT HYDERABAD [Orgonized by Hlgh Court Legot Services Committee High Courl lor the Slote o[ Telongono (Through video Conterence mode) Under Section I ? ol lhe Legol servlces Aulhorilies Act. 1987 (centtol Acl)l MACMA No. 2594 of 2011 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) (Agoinst the order in o.P. No. 2106 ol 2OO7 on lhe tile of lhe choirmon, Motor Ac cidenls cloims Tribunol-c um - lll Addl. Chiel Judge, City Civil Courl, Hyderobod) Appellonli Petitioner Respondenls/Respondenls ,'(: / (' LCI( ADAL,\.i / 'i '' a' r. i. 2 .v'errkoteshwor Roo, S/o.Veero.bodro Roo, Aged 42 Yeors, Occ: Fiiler, Presenlly Nil. R/o. Plot No. 4l , Kolpono Socity, Gonesh Nogor, Chitol. HYderobod. Metrochem API Pvt. Ltd.. ReP. l:Y N.Venko'leshwor Roo, Flol No. 302, Bhonu Enclove, beside ESI HosPiiol, Errogoddo, Hyderobod. lclcl Lombord Generol lnsuronce Co. Ltd., Rep. by ii's Monoger, 6-3-35211, lll Floor, Osmon Plozo, Rood No.l, Bonjoro Hills, Hyderobod. [No. cf proceedings of the High Court Legol S ORDER ROC.No.l 95/HCLSC/2021, Dcted 30-0 ervices Committee: 1-2021) :: Pr€rsenl :; l.lome of Choirmon Nome of Members : Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Noveen Roo, Judge, High Court for lhe Stote of Telongono' : (1) Sri Mettu Goverdhon Reddy, Advocote, High Court for lhe Slote of Telongono (2) Smt.P.Sujotho, Advocole, High Court for lhe Stole of lelongono' AWARD The obove Cose between lhe porties hoving been referred for determinolion to 'the LoK ADALAT onc ihe porties hoving compromised the cose / motter, lhe following Aword is possed in lerms of the settlemenl: I . This MACMA crises ouf of the order doted i9-01-2010 in OP.No.2l06 of 2OO7 on the file of lhe Choirmon' Motor Vehicle Accident Cloims Tribunol-cum- lll Additionol Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderobod.

2. The Tribunol hos gronted compensolion of Rs' l,l0'000/- (Rupees one lokh ten ihouscrnd only) wth proportionqte costs ond int6i'rest @ 7.5%peronnumfromthedoteofpetitiontillthedoteofre{lizoiion. Aggrieved by the order. lhe cloirnoni hos prefened this oppeol' During ihe pen<loncy of oppeol both the porties hove compromised the moiter. \ \3 The A ppello n l/Pe tilioner olong ,i^/ith his courset Sri K.Hori Moh( Reddy, Advocote, hos represenred before the virtuor Lok Adorot by\ ottending in lhe office of Secretory, High Court Legol Services\ Comnrittee, High Court for the Siote of Telongono. \ \

4. Ihe Respondenl No.2/lnsuronce Compony _ ICICI Lombord Generol lnsuronce Compony Limiied, Sri Md. Bobu, Slote Heod-Legol, hos represented through online over the link provicJed by the High Court legol Services Commitlee, High Court for the Stqte of Telongono. 5' Both the porties stored thot they resorved the <Jispute omicobry ond entered inlo compromise. The Appellont/petiiioner hos produceti copy of Aodhor Cord in proof of his identificotion. The motter hcrs been settled omicobly between the porties. . The Respondent No.2/lnsuronce Compony is willing Rs r.25,000/- (Rupees one rokh twenty five thousond onry) full ond finol setflement oport from the omounl deposite lower courl ond lhe Appelloni/pelitioner is c,lso ogreed io the some lowords full ond finql setilernent. to poy towords d in the rec eive

7. Accordingry the oword is possed for the obove soid omounI .f Rs.1.25,000/- (Rupees One lokh tweniy five ihousond only) loworcts full ond finol selllement oporl from the omo(rnt deposited in lhe lower court. G ,r SStiii l1 HICH COUiil- \,. B. Ihe Respondenl No.2/lnsuronce Compony ho:; f6 !sp65it lhe soid omount of Rs.1,25,000/_ (Rupees One iokh ivrenty five thousond only) towords fulj ond finol setflement oporl from lhe omounl deposited in the lower court within o period of two (2) months frorn the dote of receipl of copy of this oword ofter giving due credit lo the qmounr orreody deposited. rn the event of defourt or deroy in moking such deposit, the omount poyoble sholl corry interesl ot l2% per onnum from the dole of defoult. 9. After deposit of setiled omount. the permitted lo withdrow the entire omounl. Appellont/pelitioner l5

10. ln terms of the compromise orrived of between the porties, slonds disposed of. this cose I i.The porlies ore informed thoi the courl fee, if ony, poid by ony of them before lower court sholl be refunded. // - \ ! t,, i- ,r i 1 a-' .b VryT', Appellont/ Cloimont Il'r su L CENA!i 5l Res *//pr Counsel for Cloimont Counsel for Respondent No.2 / lnsuronce Compony P ?1"--.9, Choirmon DoIe:20.02.2021 _! 1; i,.*f/* Mfmber iJ?i3?ixr o ;{ mm ittee) * (s I )