The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad

2. Vuyyuru Sundara Reddy, s/o Pulla Reddy, Aged about 39yrs, Occ- Private Employee, R/o 806, A Block, Nayan Nature Springs, Paparayudu Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ... Respondents/De-facto com plainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings Petitioner/against the petitioner/Accused in C.C.No.5717 of 2025 on the file of the Vl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitioner/accused in C.C.No.5717 ot 2025 on the file of the Vl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition. i l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: Vuyyuru su1da11!eg{y, s/o puila R.qddy, Aged about 39yrs, occ- private Employeg, E/o,906,, A,Btock, Nayan Natdie Springr, papa'raiuOu U"gii'- Kukatpally, Hyderabad ..Petitioner/Respondent No.2/De-facto complainant in l.A Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 AND 1 G-arapati swami su.dheer Raidu, s/o Venkata satyanarayana, Aged about 30yrs, occ- setf Emptoyeb, R/o riit-- ito.7g;'- SEH=-cffi;; GanapathiComplex Down, Srinagbr Colony, Hrde;jb;J' ...Respondenupetitioner/Accused in l.A.[.los.2 and 3 of 202s

2. The State-oJJe,]a,1Oana,,Rep by its public prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hydeiabad. ...Respondents/Respondent No.l in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 202s Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the permissions Petition, the High Court'miy be pteased to feimit the petitioner/respondent No.2 to compound th6 offernces with the respondent/petitioner/ Accused herein-b-y- allowing the Crimirral petition filed by the petitioner against c.c No.571l ot zci2s on th6 fite of the Vt Additionat chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad. t.A. NO: oF 202s Petition und.er Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit Joint memo a.long with'compiomise petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the petitioner/de_facto "o*fiainant to Compromise the case with the Petitioner/Accused and the prcceeJi;g; against the petitioner/Accused may be quashed in c.c.N o.5717 of 2025 on the fite of the vl Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MARATI DINESH, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla Additional Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent r\o.1, and of Ms L.Swetha, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA I.A.N os.2and3of 2025 in/and CRIMINALP lTto NNo .1101 7 ol 2025 COMMO N ORDER: 1. This Criminal petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.S71l ot 2O2S on the file of learned Vl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad, for the offence punishabre under section 2gl of BNS and sections 183 and 184 of the Motor Vehicle Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused as wel as respondent No.2tde facfo comprainant that during pendency of the present criminar petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences. 3 The leamed Assistant public prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S which disclose that he has willingly I 2 !-I- \-- L1D. J Ctlp_l l0l7_2025 consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana yrde orders dated 28.08.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the pa(ies and submit a report to that effect

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by' this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 08.09.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings tuc.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (2OO7 O), I FSC Code:SB |N002OO7O, M tCR No.500004057) registered against the petitioner/accused, are hereby quashed subject to the t I 3 LZD, J Crlp_l l0l7_2025 petitioner/accused paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Director, sainik welfare, Hyderabad (savings A/c.No.52188926279, state Bank of lndia, shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:S81N0020070, M|CR No.50000 4OS7) and Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Terangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shatt stand crosed. SD/- A SREENIVASA REDDY SISTANT REGTSTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER I To,

1. The Vl Addtinal chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The station House officer, Masabtank police station, Hyderabad. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to SRI MARATT DINESH, Advocate tOpUCI 5. One CC to Ms. L.Swetha, Advocate tOpUCI 6. Two CD Copies (Along with copy of joint Memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs.10,o0o/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri M.Dinesh, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 18-09.2025 as Rs.5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,ooo/- ( Rupees Five thousand onty ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.120478 ot 2025. .ka!..l+----. ...;11 :: .., :.-i'. : ' ' 'i"t 'i1'/ir:' ' .' *. -1 HIGH COURT DATED:1810912025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.11017 ot 2025 -1 '"..riI SI.. <t' I () 7. 1,1 I (. ? { ltou 265 t-../ ALLOWING THE CR|MINAL pETtTtON AND t.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 1 1\ \Q